Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules
View Post
Hornsby put up a 150 OPS+ until 1920, the first year of the true Live Ball era. Wagner matched that for his entire career. Granted, Hornsby was young then. But Wagner's OPS+ includes his decline years.
If you think that Wagner could have put up similar relative stats in the 1920s that he did in the 1900s, then his numbers look incredible.
From 1920-1929, Hornsby put up some video game numbers to the tune of .382/.460/.637. However, Hornsby's league averaged .291/.349/.406 during this time frame.
From 1900-1909, Wagner went .352/.417/.508. Wagner relative stats in those 3 categories were: 1.323/1.271/1.485.
If we assume Wagner would have put up the same relative stats during Hornsby's era, then
Wagner's 10 year peak now looks like this from 1920-1929: .385/.444/.603.
I've always agreed with the batting average and on-base percentage piece. The number I've questioned is the slugging percentage. However, the more I've read about Wagner, the more I realize the he didn't simply chop at the ball for singles. Wagner was a very powerful man for his era and he swung hard at the ball. Wagner had a good homerun swing. If this is true, then Wagner easily could have added 95 points to his slugging percentage with a much more lively baseball, the banning of spitballs, and a good slugging park like St Louis. 95 points might be underestimating his slugging ablities.
.385 avg and .603 slugging percentage alone moves Wagner up.
More on Wagner later.
Keep the great articles coming. I appreciate them.
Leave a comment: