When I first arrived here at BBF I had many "set" opinions. But given the quality of posters here and the many sound, well reasoned arguments I've decided to revist two "set" views:
1) Joe Morgan vs Rogers Hornsby
I'm a staunch Morganite but I an starting to see the Hornsby argument. Hitting .400 over with power over a five year period is
Though I still have issues with Hornsby's defense and the lack of talent in the NL of the 1920s.
2) Is Cobb the greatest player ever?
Bill has presented a well reasoned and thorough argument for Cobb. Though I still have issues with Cobb's lack of league leading stats in the 1920s and his refusal to hit HRs.
I am going to do some long term thorough research to look further into these issues. I'd like to thank Bill Burgess, ElHalo, csh19792001, 538280, SABR Matt, Sultan_1895-1948, leecemark, and everyone else for your posts. I've learned so much and have increased my baseball knowledge and appreciation.
Has anyone else changes some views because of BBF?
1) Joe Morgan vs Rogers Hornsby
I'm a staunch Morganite but I an starting to see the Hornsby argument. Hitting .400 over with power over a five year period is

2) Is Cobb the greatest player ever?
Bill has presented a well reasoned and thorough argument for Cobb. Though I still have issues with Cobb's lack of league leading stats in the 1920s and his refusal to hit HRs.
I am going to do some long term thorough research to look further into these issues. I'd like to thank Bill Burgess, ElHalo, csh19792001, 538280, SABR Matt, Sultan_1895-1948, leecemark, and everyone else for your posts. I've learned so much and have increased my baseball knowledge and appreciation.

Has anyone else changes some views because of BBF?
Comment