Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Best Hitter of the 1970's?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    1. Rod Carew
    2. Pete Rose
    3. Reggie Jackson
    4. Joe Morgan
    5. Willie Stargell
    ?

    Comment


    • #17
      1. Willie Stargell
      2. Reggie Jackson
      3. Joe Morgan
      4. Rod Carew
      5. Reggie Smith
      "It is a simple matter to erect a Hall of Fame, but difficult to select the tenants." -- Ken Smith
      "I am led to suspect that some of the electorate is very dumb." -- Henry P. Edwards
      "You have a Hall of Fame to put people in, not keep people out." -- Brian Kenny
      "There's no such thing as a perfect ballot." -- Jay Jaffe

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Chadwick View Post
        1. Willie Stargell
        2. Reggie Jackson
        3. Joe Morgan
        4. Rod Carew
        5. Reggie Smith
        Solid choice

        good on every team that he was on
        This week's Giant

        #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

        Comment


        • #19
          Greatest hitter doesn't mean what it used to.
          "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

          Comment


          • #20
            1. Steve Garvey
            2. Jim Rice
            3. Greg Luzinski
            4. George Foster
            5. Lou Brock
            Last edited by willshad; 07-13-2018, 11:12 AM.

            Comment


            • #21
              Most Batting Runs 1970-79, minimum OPS+ of 131:
              Code:
              Rk         Player  Rbat OPS+ BtWins   RC   PA   Age   BA  OBP  SLG
              1  Reggie Jackson 311.0  148   33.3  960 5913 24-33 .275 .363 .508
              2      Joe Morgan 310.9  140   34.4 1106 6320 26-35 .282 .404 .455
              3 Willie Stargell 298.5  156   33.8  930 5083 30-39 .287 .374 .555
              4       Rod Carew 295.2  142   31.2  985 5916 24-33 .343 .408 .454
              5   Ken Singleton 266.6  139   29.7  889 5778 23-32 .289 .398 .447
              6     Bobby Bonds 246.1  133   25.5 1022 6561 24-33 .274 .357 .483
              7    Reggie Smith 241.6  142   27.8  897 5352 25-34 .292 .374 .507
              8     Gene Tenace 224.1  137   23.1  680 4654 23-32 .245 .386 .432
              9    Johnny Bench 214.2  132   22.8  899 6006 22-31 .267 .349 .491
              10   Mike Schmidt 212.6  141   22.3  758 4506 22-29 .255 .374 .511
              Si quaeris peninsulam amoenam, circumspice.

              Comprehensive Reform for the Veterans Committee -- Fixing the Hall continued.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post
                Greatest hitter doesn't mean what it used to.
                Baseball Digest used to have an annual managers poll that included a vote on best hitter. It would be interesting to try to go back and compile those leaders for the 70s.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Freakshow View Post
                  Most Batting Runs 1970-79, minimum OPS+ of 131:
                  Code:
                  Rk Player Rbat OPS+ BtWins RC PA Age BA OBP SLG
                  1 Reggie Jackson 311.0 148 33.3 960 5913 24-33 .275 .363 .508
                  2 Joe Morgan 310.9 140 34.4 1106 6320 26-35 .282 .404 .455
                  3 Willie Stargell 298.5 156 33.8 930 5083 30-39 .287 .374 .555
                  4 Rod Carew 295.2 142 31.2 985 5916 24-33 .343 .408 .454
                  5 Ken Singleton 266.6 139 29.7 889 5778 23-32 .289 .398 .447
                  6 Bobby Bonds 246.1 133 25.5 1022 6561 24-33 .274 .357 .483
                  7 Reggie Smith 241.6 142 27.8 897 5352 25-34 .292 .374 .507
                  8 Gene Tenace 224.1 137 23.1 680 4654 23-32 .245 .386 .432
                  9 Johnny Bench 214.2 132 22.8 899 6006 22-31 .267 .349 .491
                  10 Mike Schmidt 212.6 141 22.3 758 4506 22-29 .255 .374 .511
                  Ken Singleton is almost criminally underrated or forgotten at least. Every other player here got some mention.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by PVNICK View Post

                    Ken Singleton is almost criminally underrated or forgotten at least. Every other player here got some mention.
                    I mentioned him and picked number 9 in post #3.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by NJRob65 View Post

                      I mentioned him and picked number 9 in post #3.
                      Whoops. Then again, you usually are more data oriented. Was he on your mind as a possibility before you ran thw numbers ?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by brett View Post

                        Baseball Digest used to have an annual managers poll that included a vote on best hitter. It would be interesting to try to go back and compile those leaders for the 70s.
                        I feel like there are serious discrepancies between the guys being listed here and the guys who would have been listed 8-10 years ago. Let alone in the 1970's. Rod Carew & Pete Rose are hardly topping lists. Rose is barely making it.

                        Edit: I was trying to address in a roundabout way: are we gonna address this or what? It's a pretty big deal. You guys can't tell me you don't know exactly what I'm talking about and that you didn't notice it immediately.
                        Last edited by bluesky5; 07-13-2018, 11:25 PM.
                        "No matter how great you were once upon a time — the years go by, and men forget,” - W. A. Phelon in Baseball Magazine in 1915. “Ross Barnes, forty years ago, was as great as Cobb or Wagner ever dared to be. Had scores been kept then as now, he would have seemed incomparably marvelous.”

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by bluesky5 View Post

                          I feel like there are serious discrepancies between the guys being listed here and the guys who would have been listed 8-10 years ago. Let alone in the 1970's. Rod Carew & Pete Rose are hardly topping lists. Rose is barely making it.

                          Edit: I was trying to address in a roundabout way: are we gonna address this or what? It's a pretty big deal. You guys can't tell me you don't know exactly what I'm talking about and that you didn't notice it immediately.
                          It is good that you have picked up on that point. One of the beauties of baseball is that hitting stats are reflected in reverse within pitching stats. When we discuss the batting styles of the 1970s hitters, those styles were dictated by 1) hitting coaches' from minor leagues up to the majors, and 2) the elite pitchers of the 1970s. Contact hitters prevailed not only in the 70s, but over time in most decades leading up to then, for most hitters and hitting coaches' minds, IMO. In other words, the players wanted to hit the best pitchers, and worked to do well against Seaver, Carlton, Palmer, Catfish, G Perry or any other dominant pitcher of the time. The major requirement for that was contact hitting, and all anyone had to do was to point to Dave Kingman or even the disappointing career of Bobby Bonds for support.

                          Hitters who made an uppercut the basis of their style would only find a roster spot on losing teams, and would lose their place in the lineup midway through a major slump. The process was Darwinian...... adapt or die.

                          Now, we have a new prevailing mantra, a whole new paradigm for what the hitters were supposed to be doing all along. Honestly, it is ridiculous. The laws of physics haven't changed. What has changed is the presence of player agents brainwashing players into short-term timeframes to gain a short-term heist on a contract. Players used to attempt to stick around for 10-15 years, and it seems like a lot of players are trying to make their hay within 5-7 years and then who would care after that? So, swing for the fences. (????) No one cares to remember the career path of Dan Uggla.

                          IMO, Uggla would have started at 2B for the Padres in the 1970s through age 30 at best, and then lost his spot in 1975 in some trade for a defensive improvement, and been unable to win his spot back even if the defensive improvement had an injury.

                          The whole matter is ridiculous, really.

                          The 1970s were not all that enlightened. Fans and media did not understand Garvey's limitations, and did not appreciate Gene Tenace. But we knew a hitter from a glorified softball player.
                          Catfish Hunter, RIP. Mark Fidrych, RIP. Skip Caray, RIP. Tony Gwynn, #19, RIP

                          A fanatic is someone who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. -- Winston Churchill. (Please take note that I've recently become aware of how this quote applies to a certain US president. This is a coincidence, and the quote was first added to this signature too far back to remember when).

                          Experience is the hardest teacher. She gives the test first and the lesson later. -- Dan Quisenberry.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by abolishthedh View Post


                            The 1970s were not all that enlightened. Fans and media did not understand Garvey's limitations, and did not appreciate Gene Tenace. But we knew a hitter from a glorified softball player.
                            Yes Garvey should have chastised for all those hits, RBI, durability, post season heroics , and team success.


                            The process was Darwinian...... adapt or die.
                            good pioint

                            a lot of modern players do base their hitting style on Bobby Darwin
                            Last edited by JR Hart; 07-14-2018, 11:21 AM.
                            This week's Giant

                            #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              I find it amazing that so few guys hit for both power and average back then. If I'm not mistaken, only three times in the entire decade did someone hit 40 HRs and bat .300? Aaron, Rice, and Foster (and Aaron and Rice had huge home fields advantages to help them out). I think we may be headed for another situation like this.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by willshad View Post
                                I find it amazing that so few guys hit for both power and average back then. If I'm not mistaken, only three times in the entire decade did someone hit 40 HRs and bat .300? Aaron, Rice, and Foster (and Aaron and Rice had huge home fields advantages to help them out). I think we may be headed for another situation like this.
                                I think the reason for that is because the game in that era was very balanced in term of hitting vs pitching, unlike the 1900's or 1930's or the late 1960's or the late 1990's where one side of the ball dominated. I think of of this way. What if today baseball contracted down to 6-8 teams? Each team would have so much top talent and depth that no one could dominate or stand out. Even the elite hitters and pitches would see their numbers dragged down towards the league average. This is kind of what happened in the 1970's IMO.
                                Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                                Comment

                                Ad Widget

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X