Koufax's best years came at the END of his career. Mattingly's came at the beginning. What if that had been reversed?
If we look at Mattingly's record with his best years at the END of his career, he would be a Hall of Famer. If he had a mediocre first few years, developed into the game's best player for six years, and then retired because of a bad back, he would be in the Hall of Fame.
That's exactly what happened to Koufax.
If we look at Mattingly's record with his best years at the END of his career, he would be a Hall of Famer. If he had a mediocre first few years, developed into the game's best player for six years, and then retired because of a bad back, he would be in the Hall of Fame.
That's exactly what happened to Koufax.
Comment