Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Young Christy Mathewson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Young Christy Mathewson

    Christopher Mathewson was born on August 17, 1880 in Factoryville (near the New York border), Pennsylvania, the oldest of the six children of Gilbert B., born circa 1849, and Minerva (Chapwell), born circa 1856, Mathewson. At the time of Christy’s birth his parents were living with Minerva’s stepfather and mother Nelson and Christiana Doolittle. Gilbert was working as a bartender (eventually finding work at the local post office and as a farmer as well).

    Gilbert and Minerva grew up near each other in Factoryville; in fact, Factoryville was flooded with Mathewsons and Chapwells. Gilbert joined the Union’s cause during the Civil War, enlisting at a young age (younger than 16). He served in the 2nd Pennsylvania Regiment, Heavy Artillery (112th Volunteers), Company L.

    Minerva was the daughter of George and Christiana Capwell. George, born in Rhode Island circa 1783, was 36 years older than Christiana, born in Pennsylvania circa 1819. George, a farmer, passed away in the early 1860s and Minerva married clergyman Nelson Doolittle, fourteen years older than Christiana.

    Christy attended public grade school before enrolling at the Keystone Academy, a Factoryville prep school founded in 1868 by his grandmother. He graduated in 1898 and then enrolled at Bucknell University in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.

    At the Keystone Academy Mathewson played on the baseball team beginning the first year; however, he did not pitch that season. By his second year in high school, he was captain and star pitcher of the club. He would pitch against the better club and play second base against the weaker ones. Mathewson batted cross-handed in high school, a habit he did not break until 1898.

    At Bucknell Mathewson starred at baseball (pitcher), basketball (center) and especially football. He had grown to 6’2” and nearly 200 lbs. In college he majored in forestry, was elected class president and joined the glee club, two fraternities and a couple literary societies. His star though shined on the gridiron as a fullback, punter and drop kicker. Walter Camp, father of American football, identified Mathewson as the greatest football player he ever saw.

    Mathewson attended Bucknell for two full years, 1898-99 and 1899-1900. He met his future wife there, Jane Stroughton, about the same age as Matty. They would marry over the winter of 1902-03 and have one child, a son named Christopher in 1907.

    At age 14 in 1894 during the summer prior to joining the Keystone Academy, Mathewson was tapped by a local semi-pro club to pitch. He would continue to pitch for semi-pro clubs in and around Factoryville throughout his school years until 1899.

    1898

    In 1898 before enrolling at Bucknell Mathewson pitched for a Honesdale, PA semi-pro club, for $20 a month plus board. With Honesdale he was ridiculed until he dropped his cross-handed grip, not an easy task. Also, with the club he learned his famous “fadeway,” screwball, from teammate Dave Williams (who would appear in 3 games for the Boston Red Sox in 1902 http://www.baseball-reference.com/w/willida02.shtml)

    1899

    In 1899 Matty returned to Honesdale at the beginning of summer and then joined his first professional club, Taunton, Massachusetts of the New England League for $90 a month. He made his pro debut on July 31, 1899, losing 6-5. He didn’t fare very well with Taunton, posting a 2-13 record in 17 games. After the final game of the season (a game in which Matty won), he was approached by John “Phenomenal” Smith (http://www.baseball-reference.com/s/smithph01.shtml) who had just been named manager of Norfolk in the new Virginia League that would kickoff in 1900. Smith paid Matty the same $90 a month but he guaranteed the paycheck, significant since Taunton had shorted him money.

    1900

    After his final exams in 1900, Matty joined Smith in Norfolk. In a short two months he posted a 20-2 record (also 4 shutouts and 128 K to 27 BB) and tossed a no-hitter against Hampton on June 13, missing a perfect game by a lone base on balls. Of course, this attracted major league attention.

    The Virginia League was barely holding on in 1900; in fact, it collapsed (and would reinvent itself as the Virginia-North Carolina League). The Norfolk and Portsmouth clubs continued to barnstorm against each other. They played forty straight contests, perhaps the longest season series in organized baseball history.

    Smith received two offers for Mathewson, one from the Philadelphia Phillies and the other from the New York Giants, and asked Matty his preference. Mathewson, a native of upper state Pennsylvania, chose New York. On July 13, 1900 Mathewson pitched his final game for Norfolk, a 10-7 victory in which he tripled, doubled and singled. He was then sold to the Giants for $2,000 (many sources cite $1,500 and they may be right but the $2,000 figure is supported by newspapers in December 1900 and by the subsequent lawsuit). The deal was conditional, contingent on New York’s satisfaction with the pitcher. Mathewson immediately reported to the Giants and made his major league debut on July 17.

    Mathewson was knocked around by major league batters in 1900, going 0-3 with an ERA over 5.00. In his last game on September 26 he walked six batters and blew a 7-4 lead. On December 12, 1900 E.H. Cunningham, owner of Norfolk, showed up at the National League meetings in New York. He was looking for money; the Giants still had not paid for Mathewson.

    Giants’ owner Andrew Freedman had no interest in paying and no interest in giving up Mathewson either. He immediately returned Mathewson to Norfolk, dissolving the deal and his $2,000 obligation. Unbeknown, Freedman had made a secret deal with Cincinnati Reds’ owner John Brush (Brush not only owned stock in the Giants but would eventually purchase the club outright from Freedman in 1903). Brush then drafted Mathewson off Norfolk’s roster on December 13 for the required $100 draft fee. On December 15 Brush traded Mathewson to the Giants for Amos Rusie, a 29-year-old fireballer who had already posted 245 major league victories. (However, Rusie hadn’t played since 1898 and would only appear in three more major league games.) Essentially, Brush and Freedman conspired to cheat Cunningham out of $1,900.

    Naturally, Cunningham was livid so he decided to sue. The majors had a long history of taking advantage of minor league magnates. On March 29, 1904 the matter went before the court in Brooklyn. John Montgomery Ward acted as lead counsel for Cunningham. The judge ruled in favor of Cunningham, awarding Norfolk $2,000.

    1901

    Going into 1901 the National League was having trouble with the players’ union. The players now had another option. The American League was transforming to major league status. As such, the leagues abandoned the National Agreement and decided to tamper with each other’s contracts.

    On March 30, 1901 Connie Mack, manager of the American League Philadelphia A’s posted his roster. It included a listing of a righthanded pitcher named Mathewson. In January Matty had met with Mack and took a signing bonus, committing himself for the 1901 season. However, it was not to be. Matty had used Mack’s offer as leverage against the Giants. He cashed a larger check from the Giants and tried to return Mack’s money.

    On April 1, 1901 Matty reported for his first major league spring training – with the Giants at Manhattan Field in New York. Mack went public with his allegations against Mathewson on April 3. He did not accept the return of the money from Mathewson and expected Mathewson in the A’s camp and threatened legal action.

    It was a hectic time though; rosters were changing daily. In April Mack also had star pitcher Vic Willis (http://www.baseball-reference.com/w/willivi01.shtml) jump the team and entered a legal battle against the Phillies for the rights of Nap Lajoie, Chick Fraser and Bill Bernhard. Mack eventually let the matter with Mathewson drop.

    On April 10 Mathewson blew a lead against Yale at the Polo Grounds in the ninth inning, allowing four runs for a humiliating 5-4 loss.

    1902

    In October 1902 Mathewson joined a professional football team in Pittsburgh. Connie Mack coached a team in the league. Mathewson was released in mid-November, being edged out of the halfback position by Ellis formerly of Harvard.

    1903

    After the 1902 season, St. Louis Browns’ owner Robert Hedges signed Mathewson, who had just won 34 games over the last two years, and his everyday catcher Frank Bowerman to contracts for the 1903 season including a cash advance. However, the two major leagues met in January 1903 to make peace and eliminate all this tampering. Once the basics of the agreement were worked out, major league executives had the task of settling disputes over player assignments. Hedges relinquished his claim to Mathewson, thus calming a potentially ruinous situation.
    Last edited by Brian McKenna; 05-20-2008, 11:46 AM.

  • #2
    I dig your biographical posts...thanks -- keep 'em coming! :cap:
    "Hey Mr. McGraw! Can I pitch to-day?"

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks, trying to focus more on the stuff outside the white lines.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Victory Faust View Post
        I dig your biographical posts...thanks -- keep 'em coming! :cap:
        Yeah, Brian. Thank you. These posts are great. Your focus on biographical and historical facts "outside the white line" really provide the context necessary to understand what made the game so very special.

        Aside from his tremendous talent, was Matty's fame as a runner & dropkicker at Bucknell what made it possible for him to gain acceptance with the more rough-and-tumble ballplayers in pro baseball. Or, is it more of a myth that a "college boy", president-of-his-class was that unique in the Majors? Similarly, was his pitching truly transformative in the sense it was more scientific or cerebral?

        BTW, I saw the cool new movie, "Leatherheads", with George Clooney last weekend. Though it was about 1920's pro football, I thought the John Krasinski character - with his supreme talent, college fame, and clean cut good looks and charm - was very reminiscent of Mathewson

        Comment


        • #5
          To me, this whole college guy myth is overblown - popularly hyped by Asimof in Eight Men Out - like a bunch of other myths.

          When a gutter guy like McGraw can live, vacation and party with Arlie Pond and others than you realize that they're all just guys connecting through the game. I don't recall any prima donnas at my college - just a lot of drinking and partying - I think - it's all a blur.

          I don't think teams were separated into college types and those with "common" backgrounds as much. Probably what separated guys on a team back then more than anything is their marital status, race (of course), ethnic background (all this Italian etc. stuff), religion (we see this in the Speaker bios) and basic age and perhaps tenure differences.

          I'm thinking it was easier to overcome this gap in education between teammates more so than this urban vs. rural and geographical (northern vs. southern etc.) background differences which go to the very core of a person's identity, personality and experiences.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Brian McKenna View Post
            1900
            Mathewson was knocked around by major league batters in 1900, going 0-3 with an ERA over 5.00. In his last game on September 26 he walked six batters and blew a 7-4 lead. On December 12, 1900 E.H. Cunningham, owner of Norfolk, showed up at the National League meetings in New York. He was looking for money; the Giants still had not paid for Mathewson.
            Brian,
            Fantastic stuff!! Thank you for taking the time to put this together! Out of curiosity, did you type all this out by hand??

            Re: Matty getting shelled in 1900, there's some very interesting information in this fantastic read which lends some insight into how Matty's teammates perceived him.

            Have you had a chance to read the new Deford book yet?

            In particular, it was noted that many of the current Giant players in 1900 viewed him as a prima donna of sorts. Simply put, Deford notes that some of the Giants wouldn't play their hardest on defense with Matty on the mound.

            Since there were SO many unearned runs in those days, and all people knew about (or cared about) were wins and losses, I think the anti Matty faction knew exactly how to make him look bad. Little know is that there was quite a bit of enmity and jealousy early on with Mathewson. He was viewed as just too pretty, pristine, and erudite.

            This was class warfare in a much more socioeconomically homogeneous era.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by csh19792001 View Post
              Brian,
              Fantastic stuff!! Thank you for taking the time to put this together! Out of curiosity, did you type all this out by hand??
              Of course buddy. If I'd directly copied it from someone else, I'd have put it in quotes.

              In particular, it was noted that many of the current Giant players in 1900 viewed him as a prima donna of sorts. Simply put, Deford notes that some of the Giants wouldn't play their hardest on defense with Matty on the mound.

              Since there were SO many unearned runs in those days, and all people knew about (or cared about) were wins and losses, I think the anti Matty faction knew exactly how to make him look bad. Little know is that there was quite a bit of enmity and jealousy early on with Mathewson. He was viewed as just too pretty, pristine, and erudite.

              This was class warfare in a much more socioeconomically homogeneous era.
              I wonder which it is. Are rookies treated/viewed poorly because of some sort of perception/characteristic or are the supposed perceptions/characteristics mere excuses for treating/viewing a rookie poorly?

              I also wonder if an author just doesn't give too much credence to or overemphasize something in hindsight. How much effect did Mathewson really have on his teammates in 1900 considering he was just another rookie (which they all had seen many come and go) and he only saw action in six games in 11 weeks with the club. I'm not sure that a truely "pretty, pristine, and erudite" guy would even go into the life of a ballplayer in the first place - especially not get involved within the brutality of football back then.

              The making him look bad stuff smacks of game-fixing to me. It may have been accepted back then but I sure would like to seen someone banned for it.
              Last edited by Brian McKenna; 04-21-2008, 07:37 AM.

              Comment

              Ad Widget

              Collapse
              Working...
              X