Ted Williams hit .406 in 1941, and we all know he was the last player to hit .400 THAT WAS ELIGIBLE TO WIN THE BATTING TITLE.
Williams hit over .400 again in 1953 when he hit .407 in 91 at bats - far too few to be eliglbe for the batting title that year.
And I'm sure there have been several other players since then who have hit .400 or better in limited play. What I want to know is this:
Of those player who have hit .400 or better since Williams did it in 1941, who had the most at bats? Or the most plate appearances? Was it Williams himself in 1953? Or was there another player who was still hitting over .400 and made it to 100 at bats, or even 200 at bats?
I guess another way of asking the same question is this:
If players only had to have a minimum of 100 at bats to be elgible for the batting title, then who was the last player to hit .400 or better in a season?
Williams hit over .400 again in 1953 when he hit .407 in 91 at bats - far too few to be eliglbe for the batting title that year.
And I'm sure there have been several other players since then who have hit .400 or better in limited play. What I want to know is this:
Of those player who have hit .400 or better since Williams did it in 1941, who had the most at bats? Or the most plate appearances? Was it Williams himself in 1953? Or was there another player who was still hitting over .400 and made it to 100 at bats, or even 200 at bats?
I guess another way of asking the same question is this:
If players only had to have a minimum of 100 at bats to be elgible for the batting title, then who was the last player to hit .400 or better in a season?
Comment