Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Greatest Teams of All Time-#1

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greatest Teams of All Time-#1

    Ok, let's begin. I'll give a week for each poll.
    Last edited by Honus Wagner Rules; 03-28-2006, 07:20 AM. Reason: add text
    Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

  • #2
    1-1927 Yankees (nuff said)
    2-1998 Yankees (best team I ever saw in my lifetime)
    3-1906 Cubs* (Brown has legendary season, best pitching staff ever number wise)
    4-1929 Athletics (imagine if they still had Ty Cobb around)
    5-1936 Yankees (Gehrig's MVP; Dimaggio's rookie year)
    6-1961 Yankees (career year for Maris, great Mickey year)
    7-1975 Reds (stacked lineup, Joe Morgon somehow found a way to hit .300)
    8-2004 Red Sox (great line up plus 2 Cy Young candidates)
    9-2001 Diamondbacks (career years by Johnson, Schilling and Luis Gonzolez)
    10-2001 Yankees* (this team was so good)

    I'll admit I'm limited to only what teams I've been able to watch in my lifetime, but this is balancing that out and balancing out everything I've ever read about great teams in the past.

    *-didn't win World Series

    Comment


    • #3
      I'll take a crack at this ...

      1. 1939 New York Yankees
      2. 1927 New York Yankees
      3. 1975 Cincinnati Reds
      4. 1998 New York Yankees
      5. 1942 St. Louis Cardinals
      6. 1976 Cincinnati Reds
      7. 1909 Pittsburgh Pirates
      8. 1929 Philadelphia A's
      9. 1906 Chicago Cubs
      10. 1910 Philadelphia A's

      One thing I do not like about my list is the dominance of teams from the first half of the 20th century, but I guess you'll have that. The 1942 St. Louis Cardinals may be one of the most overlooked and underrated great teams of all-time, IMO.
      Jason

      Whenever I swung at a bad ball a little bit high or even inside I didn't like it, but when I swung at a bad ball that was in the dirt or outside, Jesus, I just wanted to puke because I knew that if I hit it I wouldn't have done anything with it anyway. -- Ted Williams

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Cyclone792
        The 1942 St. Louis Cardinals may be one of the most overlooked and underrated great teams of all-time, IMO.
        There's another team near there that may be BETTER, and even MORE overlooked
        Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
        Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge

        Comment


        • #5
          1) 1975 (or 76) Reds
          2) 1998 Yankess
          3) 1984 Tigers
          4) 1927 Yankees
          5) 1955 Dodgers

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by leecemark
            1) 1975 (or 76) Reds
            Wow, these guys just continue to get overrated. Even with time period adjustments, I wonder
            Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
            Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge

            Comment


            • #7
              --What makes you say they are overrated? They dominated their league and won the World Series in back to back seasons. Basically the same cast won the division 4 times in 5 years. Half their starting lineup is in the Hall of Fame and the rest were All Star caliber players. They had the best bullpen of their decade (which the best in hisotry up to that point). Admittedly their starting pitching was less than great, but they were solid.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by leecemark
                --What makes you say they are overrated? They dominated their league and won the World Series in back to back seasons. Basically the same cast won the division 4 times in 5 years. Half their starting lineup is in the Hall of Fame and the rest were All Star caliber players. They had the best bullpen of their decade (which the best in hisotry up to that point). Admittedly their starting pitching was less than great, but they were solid.
                The 75 Reds only led their league by 46 adjusted batting runs and had an OPS+ 5% than the 2nd best team. Good but not best ever. The pitching was so poor on the 76 Reds. And I guess it does depend upon how much we weight the postseason.
                Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
                Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge

                Comment


                • #9
                  --Having an OPS+ only 5% better than the next best team doesn't mean you aren't a great offensive team. That would depend on who the #2 squad was. You can have more than one great hitting team in a league you know.
                  --Poor is also not a good description of the 76 Reds pitching. It was (by ERA+ anyway) dead average. I actually listed the 75 club which had an ERA+ well above league anyway.
                  --As to the postseason, I suppose it is possible to have been the best team ever and not won it all in that season. It is a substantial burden to overcome though.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by leecemark
                    --Poor is also not a good description of the 76 Reds pitching. It was (by ERA+ anyway) dead average.
                    Sounds poor for the best team ever

                    <I actually listed the 75 club>

                    Both actually

                    <which had an ERA+ well above league anyway.>

                    A bunch of poor teams

                    <As to the postseason, I suppose it is possible to have been the best team ever and not won it all in that season. It is a substantial burden to overcome though.>

                    There go the '54 Tribe (the '06 Cubs for that matter, '12 & '13 Giants, '43 Cards ...
                    Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
                    Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I'm always surprised that on lists like this the Swingin' A's of the 70's get the short shrift. 3 straight WS titles (including on one over the Reds) 5 straight divisions, yet the Reds and Yanks get all the love.

                      My contention is that the A's were far more of a team than the other's in the 70's. The played hard together on the field, fought each other off it, yet kept on winning despite having one of the most contentious owners in the history of baseball. Why, because when they got on the field their one focus was to win and do what ever it took to win. That's how a guy like Gene Tenace comes out of nowhere to hit 4 HR's in the WS in 1972. Or get's three straight pinch hits to win a WS game. Total team baseball on the field.

                      The team doesn't look great on paper, three HOFer's, no one else even close, and not even a lot of stars. Yet they dominated the game over that time period.

                      So how about a little respect for Reggie, Catfish, Rollie, Vida, Geno, Kenny, Joe and Cap'n Sal??

                      KH14
                      “Well, I like to say I’m completely focused, right? I mean, the game’s on the line. It’s not like I’m thinking about what does barbecue Pop Chips and Cholula taste like. Because I already know that answer — it tastes friggin’ awesome!"--Brian Wilson

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I like the A's too, KHenry (might want to look closer at the team, they might have one more deserving HOF player, at least IMO). The only problem with this is that it's hard to pick out one year ('72 or '73 or '74) when they were the most dominant. For a period of years, I would probably pick them as the greatest team of all time. I'm not so clear whether this is meant to be just one year of if it is meant to be best "dynasty". I like to combine both, really, so this is my list:

                        1.1972-74 Oakland Athletics (could pick any year)
                        2.1975-1976 Cincinnati Reds
                        3.1936-1939 New York Yankees
                        4.1927 New York Yankees
                        5.1986 New York Mets
                        6.1998 New York Yankees
                        7.1906-1908 Chicago Cubs
                        8.1970 Baltimore Orioles
                        9.1953 New York Yankees
                        10.1984 Detroit Tigers
                        Last edited by 538280; 03-28-2006, 06:11 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by 538280
                          I like the A's too, KHenry (might want to look closer at the team, they might have one more deserving HOF player, at least IMO). The only problem with this is that it's hard to pick out one year ('72 or '73 or '74) when they were the most dominant. For a period of years, I would probably pick them as the greatest team of all time. I'm not so clear whether this is meant to be just one year of if it is meant to be best "dynasty". I like to combine both, really, so this is my list:

                          1.1972-74 Oakland Athletics (could pick any year)
                          I go for 74 over 72 but the '73 pitching could have been better
                          Mythical SF Chronicle scouting report: "That Jeff runs like a deer. Unfortunately, he also hits AND throws like one." I am Venus DeMilo - NO ARM! I can play like a big leaguer, I can field like Luzinski, run like Lombardi. The secret to managing is keeping the ones who hate you away from the undecided ones. I am a triumph of quantity over quality. I'm almost useful, every village needs an idiot.
                          Good traders: MadHatter(2), BoofBonser26, StormSurge

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by leecemark
                            1) 1975 (or 76) Reds
                            2) 1998 Yankess
                            3) 1984 Tigers
                            4) 1927 Yankees
                            5) 1955 Dodgers
                            Mark, Can you list 10 teams.
                            Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              1. 1927 Yankees
                              2. 1939 Yankees
                              3. 1998 Yankees
                              4. 1975 Reds
                              5. 1906 Cubs
                              6. 1929 A's
                              7. 1936 Yankees
                              8. 1910 A's
                              9. 1976 Reds
                              10.1972 A's
                              "I was pitching one day when my glasses clouded up on me. I took them off to polish them. When I looked up to the plate, I saw Jimmie Foxx. The sight of him terrified me so much that I haven't been able to wear glasses since." - Left Gomez

                              "(Lou) Gehrig never learned that a ballplayer couldn't be good every day." - Hank Gowdy

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X