Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Most Controversial 'Blown Calls' in MLB History

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Most Controversial 'Blown Calls' in MLB History

    Hey guys,

    I was trying to think back through all of the biggest umpiring blunders in MLB history, because they are, in my opinion, such a great part of the games history. I love that some of the most memorable moments in the game's history stems from questionable calls because those moments make for such great discussion down the road.

    What I want to do is create a list of all of the greatest and most memorable controversial calls in MLB history.

    I'll start us off. First, there's the ultimate controversial call surrounding 'Merkle's Boner,' which (in some people's opinions), robbed the Giants of a World Series berth and handed it to the Cubs in 1908.

    There is also the infamous call by umpire Don Denkinger at first base in game six of the 1985 World Series, which gave the Royals a free pass and eventually the whole championship.

    What else can you all come up with?

  • #2
    Originally posted by deadball-era-rules View Post
    Hey guys,

    I was trying to think back through all of the biggest umpiring blunders in MLB history, because they are, in my opinion, such a great part of the games history. I love that some of the most memorable moments in the game's history stems from questionable calls because those moments make for such great discussion down the road.

    What I want to do is create a list of all of the greatest and most memorable controversial calls in MLB history.

    I'll start us off. First, there's the ultimate controversial call surrounding 'Merkle's Boner,' which (in some people's opinions), robbed the Giants of a World Series berth and handed it to the Cubs in 1908.

    There is also the infamous call by umpire Don Denkinger at first base in game six of the 1985 World Series, which gave the Royals a free pass and eventually the whole championship.


    What else can you all come up with?
    That call didn't give the Royals the '85 World Series. Some facts:

    1) Jorge Orta, who got the gift call, NEVER scored. He was forced out at third.
    2) Jack Clark and Darrell Porter dropped an easy Steve Balboni foul ball near the first base dugout. Balboni subsequently singled.
    3) Darrell Porter had a crucial passed ball.
    4) Jim Sundberg attempted a bunt but Todd Worrell forced out Orta at third.
    5) The Cards walked Hal McCrae intentionally, moving the winning run into scoring position.
    6) This was Game 6, not Game 7, so the Cards still had a chance to win the World Series.
    7) The Cards imploded in Game 7 with several ejections and lost 11-0.
    Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
      1) Jorge Orta, who got the gift call, NEVER scored. He was forced out at third.
      I'm not sure why that matters. Even after that out, the Royals still had a runner on the bases that shouldn't be there.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ipitch View Post
        I'm not sure why that matters. Even after that out, the Royals still had a runner on the bases that shouldn't be there.
        How do you figure that the hitters after Orta would not have gotten on base? We don't know that. For all we know Steve Balboni, the batter after Orta, could have homered and tied the score. Or Balboni could have made an out. We'll never know.
        Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
          How do you figure that the hitters after Orta would not have gotten on base? We don't know that. For all we know Steve Balboni, the batter after Orta, could have homered and tied the score. Or Balboni could have made an out. We'll never know.
          Right, we'll never know. All I'm saying is that Orta being forced out doesn't erase the blown call.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by ipitch View Post
            Right, we'll never know. All I'm saying is that Orta being forced out doesn't erase the blown call.
            That's true, but the Cards can't claim that the blown call caused them to lose Game 6.
            Last edited by Honus Wagner Rules; 04-14-2009, 07:03 PM.
            Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
              That's true, but the Cards can't claim that the blown call caused them to lose Game 6.
              True, but there seems to be a pattern in the postseason of a team suffering a catastrophic game 6 loss that changes the momentum so significantly that they are totally discombobulated and unprepared for game 7. Witness the '86 Red Sox after Buckner's error, and the '03 Cubs after the the Bartman incident. I guess it's a test of championship mettle, if they can't shake off game 6 and focus on game 7, maybe they're not cut out to be champions.
              Shalom, y'all!
              What's the rumpus?

              Comment


              • #8
                Bill Stewart's call in the bottom of the eighth during the game one of the 1948 World Series.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by ol' aches and pains View Post
                  True, but there seems to be a pattern in the postseason of a team suffering a catastrophic game 6 loss that changes the momentum so significantly that they are totally discombobulated and unprepared for game 7. Witness the '86 Red Sox after Buckner's error,
                  I don't really see that. The Sox had 3-0 lead after 5 innings in game 7, and they didn't commit any errors in the game. They even scored 2 runs in the 8th right after the Mets took the lead in the 7th.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This is exactly what I like about those controversial calls- they immortalize the moment to be debated for all time. We'll never settle that stupid call by Denkinger, but we can always argue it. Had he gotten the call right, then the Cards just would have won the World Series and it would have been just another flag for St. Louis. (can you detect my bias)?

                    Be that as it may, I'd like to keep this thread mostly devoid of debate over the topics themselves, I would prefer that we merely compile those memorable moments. As it stands right now, I'm still the only one to post any infamous blown calls. Perhaps we can create a separate thread on some of these specific calls if we feel there's enough material there.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      How about the Barnett call in Game 3 of the '75 Series? Fisk made a throwing error when Armbrister interfered with him fielding the bunt. Barnett didn't call interference and let the error stand, resulting in a win for the Reds.

                      Or the very famous steal of home by Jackie Robinson in Game 1 of the '55 Series? Yogi Berra tagged Robinson in time, but the ump called Robinson safe. (The Yankees won the game anyway.) But there's a very famous photograph of that moment and it further solidifies the umpire's call; right or wrong.

                      More recently was Rich Garcia's 1996 blown home run call courtesy of 12-year old fan Jeff Maier, reaching out onto the field and deflecting what would have been a long out for Derek Jeter.
                      "It is a simple matter to erect a Hall of Fame, but difficult to select the tenants." -- Ken Smith
                      "I am led to suspect that some of the electorate is very dumb." -- Henry P. Edwards
                      "You have a Hall of Fame to put people in, not keep people out." -- Brian Kenny
                      "There's no such thing as a perfect ballot." -- Jay Jaffe

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        1970 world series ken burkhart call

                        In the '70 series, Reds Bernie Carbo tried to score from third as Ty Cline chopped a ball in front of the plate and umpire Ken Burkhart got out in front of the plate to see if it was fair or foul. Orioles catcher Elrod Hendricks gloved the ball and as he turned to tag Carbo, Burkhart got in the way. Hendricks held the ball in his bare hand and swiped at Carbo with his empty glove. Burkhart's view was completely blocked but when he could see, he noticed Hendricks holding the ball and Carbo way out of the baseline,so he called him out. Sparky Anderson went nuts but the call stood.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Not much heard about this one but it was big at the time.
                          The significance, again no way to tell what the Yanks might have done if the lead runner in that 10th inning got on. But it put the Dodgers up 3 games to 2 and now the Yanks go to Brooklyn facing a very good Dodger team. Also in the bottom of the 11th, Johnny Mize robbed of a home run, leap by Furillo in right field.
                          The ump is not in the very best position, but good enough, in baseball this one is not even that close of a call, he blew it.
                          The Yanks took the next two games, won the WS.
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by banny View Post
                            In the '70 series, Reds Bernie Carbo tried to score from third as Ty Cline chopped a ball in front of the plate and umpire Ken Burkhart got out in front of the plate to see if it was fair or foul. Orioles catcher Elrod Hendricks gloved the ball and as he turned to tag Carbo, Burkhart got in the way. Hendricks held the ball in his bare hand and swiped at Carbo with his empty glove. Burkhart's view was completely blocked but when he could see, he noticed Hendricks holding the ball and Carbo way out of the baseline,so he called him out. Sparky Anderson went nuts but the call stood.
                            That one was different in kind because the "blow" was making a call when there was none to be made. Calling Carbo safe at home would have been another one of the same kind.
                            (If there was some case to call Carbo out for leaving the baseline to avoid a tag then the safe call would have been worse. I don't expect that baseline call in the major leagues and don't have any background for judging when it should be made.)

                            In 1977 NLCS game three, Gene Garber and the Phillies lost a two-run lead in the ninth inning. They got the first two batters; then bunt single, line double, infield single, pickoff error, ground single (three runs). The infield single by Davey Lopes was the bad call at firstbase and the tying run scored on that hit.

                            Contrast that with Orta's infield single. In 1977 there were two out so the game would have ended if Lopes were out. That play tied the score, so the following fielding failure (pickoff 1977 vs foul pop 1985) lost only a chance to preserve a tie. On the other hand, it was only game three, 1-1 in a best-of-five series, where the 1985 Cardinals would win the series by retiring Orta & co. It was the semifinal, not the world series. And it was a close play. Orta wasn't really close.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              How about the ball call in Milt Pappas' perfect game which turned it into "only" a no-hitter?
                              Please check out my collection of vintage baseball recordings:

                              http://www.oldtimesports.net/users/AWilliams

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X