Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

All Star Game - some thoughts and debates

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • All Star Game - some thoughts and debates

    I have seen various things said about the all-star game and related items on this and other sites (there were many on the "what would you do as commissioner" thread here on BB Fever) and I have to throw some things out there

    I am not trying to start arguments or point fingers but some of the logic or stated facts are at the least debatable

    ITEM 1) "The all-star game is intended for players who had the best first halves"

    my reaction is really?

    rebuttal 1: did the creator of the all-star game back in 1933 say I want to create a game for the fans to see the best first half players? I doubt it. Is there a written stipulation in an all-star game "charter" that says that the all-star game is intended for players who had the best first halves?

    rebuttal 2: did the game "evolve" into that intention today? when did the change take place? was it gradual? recent? or just some fans take? you have an established star say a Brooks Robinson who hits in the first half .275 with 9 HR. another player comes up and has a hot few weeks and hits .285 with 12 home runs. It can be argued the other player had a better first half, I would rather see Brooks in the all-star game, not even a close decision for me.

    rebuttal 3: player "A" plays in a "cold" weather city, that city heats up in the summer, June/July/August and that's when he piles up his offesnive numbers. Player "B" plays in a "warm" weather city and can get better offensive numbers "earlier" due to hotter weather earlier and when you compare the two players "B" has better first half stats than "A", is it fair for player "A" to be excluded?

    rebuttal 4: how/when do you honor a player who has a great second half of the season? in last year's all-star game? impossible! in next year's all-star game? well what if he doesn't have a big first half? how do you account for a player with this type of second half production? (off the top of my head I am thinking Bill White 1964 as an example).

    ITEM 2) these are often combined in comments by the same person... "don't let the all-star game decide HFA in the world series because it is an exhibition game" and "take the voting away from the fans"

    rebuttal (pretty obvious): if it is an exhibition and should not have any attached results/importance, why would it make sense to take the fans out of the voting? I would say that it is pretty much a definition of exhibition to be for the fans

    and then there are some semantics issues

    is an all-star game a game with a collection of stars? or a game with a collection of all-stars? I always found it make more sense (in my George Carlin/Gallagher way) that a player is not an all-star, he is a star and the misdummer game is an all-star game, which is a collection of stars. Why do we need the extra "all", he can make the all-star team/game, but he is a star, not an all-star. (sorry for this one, just my pet peeve)
    1. The more I learn, the more convinced I am that many players are over-rated due to inflated stats from offensive home parks (and eras)
    2. Strat-O-Matic Baseball Player, Collector and Hobbyist since 1969, visit my strat site: http://forums.delphiforums.com/GamersParadise
    3. My table top gaming blog: http://cary333.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    Don't look too deeply into this. The game was for the fans. It still is. The whole home field advantage thing is to encourage managers to, well, manage to win the game. Ties are no longer possible, which gets Uncle Bud off the hook as he no longer has to make tough decisions about exhibition games.
    Your Second Base Coach
    Garvey, Lopes, Russell, and Cey started 833 times and the Dodgers went 498-335, for a .598 winning percentage. That’s equal to a team going 97-65 over a season. On those occasions when at least one of them missed his start, the Dodgers were 306-267-1, which is a .534 clip. That works out to a team going 87-75. So having all four of them added 10 wins to the Dodgers per year.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5hCIvMule0

    Comment


    • #3
      You can't have it decide the outcome of the season more or less while also having it be a popularity contest with 6 Yankees and 7 Red Sox (puke). Then you have a token Pirate on there because no one can be left out.

      It's not an exhibition if it means something, so I don't know how that can be any kind of rebuttal. Just take it out of the fans' hands. Fans are stupid. Especially on the coasts.
      Go go White Sox

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Zoso View Post
        You can't have it decide the outcome of the season more or less while also having it be a popularity contest with 6 Yankees and 7 Red Sox (puke). Then you have a token Pirate on there because no one can be left out.

        It's not an exhibition if it means something, so I don't know how that can be any kind of rebuttal. Just take it out of the fans' hands. Fans are stupid. Especially on the coasts.
        but you missed the point

        people are crying out to END the HFA for the WS and then in almost the same breath, say take the voting out of the fans hands
        1. The more I learn, the more convinced I am that many players are over-rated due to inflated stats from offensive home parks (and eras)
        2. Strat-O-Matic Baseball Player, Collector and Hobbyist since 1969, visit my strat site: http://forums.delphiforums.com/GamersParadise
        3. My table top gaming blog: http://cary333.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          If the game means nothing, then who gives a rat's ass who's in the game? Let it be a democracy where the mindless masses vote in Manny and Jetah and Nomah or whoever the hell plays for Boston these days.

          I have a question: what if the game is rained out in the 4th? Then who gets HFA?
          Go go White Sox

          Comment


          • #6
            Tradition. Let's not forget that means more to baseball than any other sport. They will never take it completely away from the fans, as they always liked punching those little squares and were the inventors of the original hanging chad.

            If you are looking for a meaningless game, check out the NFL Pro Bowl. There, the players and coaches decide who gets to be named, the players get to decide if they want to opt out, and the league goes around begging players to make the trip. They beg players fans have never heard of... makes me wonder if there are large bonuses for making the Pro Bowl Squad. I am betting no, and if not, then you have a meaningless game.

            They're moving it away from Hawaii soon aren't they??

            The fans living on the 50th state must be up in arms.
            Your Second Base Coach
            Garvey, Lopes, Russell, and Cey started 833 times and the Dodgers went 498-335, for a .598 winning percentage. That’s equal to a team going 97-65 over a season. On those occasions when at least one of them missed his start, the Dodgers were 306-267-1, which is a .534 clip. That works out to a team going 87-75. So having all four of them added 10 wins to the Dodgers per year.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5hCIvMule0

            Comment


            • #7
              imo -
              the voting for the allstar game should occur after the World Series.
              The players from WS teams should be excluded from participation in either the NL or AL allstar teams.
              The two WS teams should be combined to form a third allstar team which competes with the remainder NL and AL enterents.
              Therefore there would be:
              - the WS allstars,
              - the NL allstars (comprising selections which do not include the NL pennant winner),
              - the AL allstars (comprising selections which do not include the AL pennant winner).

              Comment


              • #8
                I think interleague play destroyed much of the charisma of the ASG. The HR Derby and related stuff is cool, don't get me wrong, but again it takes away from the focus being entirely on the ASG.

                Comment

                Working...
                X