What Shoeless said for sure.
Also, its this: in 1918 and prior, it made no sense for most players to try to hit homers. Ruth was accustomed to hitting as hard as he could and for distance, so he was already 'set' for the changes in 1919-1920. I'm certain that had Ruth not existed, that some other fellows would have tried to do the same somewhere in 1919-1925. He simply did it better and because he demanded more money and being in NY was able to get it, the sensationalism of it spread faster with more impact.
It's much like the Fosbury Flop in high jumping: with foam padding it became possible, but one person had to show how it was possible to perform better, first. However, in the case of Ruth, he had also the perfect swing and great batting skill, so his contemporaries could not match him.
Also, its this: in 1918 and prior, it made no sense for most players to try to hit homers. Ruth was accustomed to hitting as hard as he could and for distance, so he was already 'set' for the changes in 1919-1920. I'm certain that had Ruth not existed, that some other fellows would have tried to do the same somewhere in 1919-1925. He simply did it better and because he demanded more money and being in NY was able to get it, the sensationalism of it spread faster with more impact.
It's much like the Fosbury Flop in high jumping: with foam padding it became possible, but one person had to show how it was possible to perform better, first. However, in the case of Ruth, he had also the perfect swing and great batting skill, so his contemporaries could not match him.
Comment