Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Mike Piazza should had been 2000 NL MVP.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mike Piazza should had been 2000 NL MVP.

    Mike Piazza, who never won an MVP, should have gotten the award in 2000.

    His 2000:

    Batting average = .324
    Slugging % = .614
    Ops = 1.012 OPS
    Home-runs = 38
    Runs batted in = 113

    2000 MVP voting:

    1.) Jeff Kent SFG (392 total; 22 1st place votes)
    2.) Barry Bonds SFG (279 total; 6 1st place votes)
    3.) Mike Piazza NYM (271 total; 3 1st place votes)

    Piazza's numbers do not blow away Kent and Bonds', but Piazza was more valuable to the New York Mets - who finished 1 game behind the Braves for the division and went to the World Series.

    Look at the 2000 New York Mets.

    - Their outfield was Benny Agbayani, Jay Payton, and Derek Bell.
    - Robin Ventura batted .232, and he failed to duplicate or even come close to his amazing 1999 season.
    - Shortstop was filled by Mike Bordick, Rey Ordonez (batting sub-.200), and Melvin Mora.

    Without Piazza, the Mets barely win 85 games; with him, they were the NL champions.
    Last edited by redban; 07-10-2012, 09:56 PM.

  • #2
    Piazza had a great year, and would have made a fine MVP, but it is unfair to say he carried the Mets by himself. Alfonso at second base had an outstanding, MVP type season himself (although it turned out to be a fluke season). That was a season in which there were MANY great MVP candidates, and I can name about 10 or 12 guys who would have made good choices...besides Kent, Bonds, and Piazza, there was Alfonso, Bagwell, Sheffield, Helton, Vlad, Edmonds, Giles, Alou,..the list goes on. Piazza was without a doubt MVP of the first half, but faded towards the end of the season if I recall correctly.

    Comment


    • #3
      If there was a year where Mike Piazza deserved the MVP then it was 1997. In 2000, I think Todd Helton, Kent, Bonds, and several others were all more valuable than Piazza.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Mr. Red View Post
        If there was a year where Mike Piazza deserved the MVP then it was 1997. In 2000, I think Todd Helton, Kent, Bonds, and several others were all more valuable than Piazza.
        I don't know about 'more valuable', maybe 'as valuable'. Seems to me that there were quite a few guys who were all pretty much equal as hitters, with Piazza being the only catcher of the bunch. So, defense not included, Piazza was the most valuable. How much you penalize him for his defense pretty much decides how you stand on the MVP issue. Bonds was already juicing, so he can't really count, and Helton was a product of Coors. Piazza's road stats are superior to Helton's, and that's not even counting the position advantage. Put Mike in Colorado and he probably has numbers like a prime Babe Ruth.
        Last edited by willshad; 04-23-2011, 05:30 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          WAR for position players in 2000:
          Helton 8.8
          Bonds 8.7
          Kent 7.9
          A. Jones 7.9
          Edmonds: 6.8
          Alfonzo 6.7
          Sheffield 6.7
          Hidalgo 6.6
          Giles 6.4
          Sosa 5.8
          Abreu 5.8
          Griffey 5.8


          Piazza had 5.2. A big problem was that he only played in 136, caught 124, DHed 5 and pinch hit in 7.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by redban View Post
            Mike Piazza - the greatest player never to win MVP - should have gotten the NL MVP award in 2000.
            Piazza was indeed a great player, but the greatest never to win an MVP award? Eddie Mathews, Duke Snider, and Al Kaline for starters might disagree.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BigRon View Post
              Piazza was indeed a great player, but the greatest never to win an MVP award? Eddie Mathews, Duke Snider, and Al Kaline for starters might disagree.
              Poor Al Kaline... two of his three best seasons were 1961 and 1967. Even in his best season (1955), he wasn't the best player (Mantle was, though Berra was the MVP and Kaline was better than Berra).
              sigpic
              5.

              Comment


              • #8
                The MVP voting during this time (1995-2000) was rather odd, as it appears that there were SO MANY good candidates each year that the voters really did not know how to handle it. They were more likely to vote for guy who had been around a while who had a career year, than a guy who was consistently great, and who put up years just as good every season. 'Second tier' players like Larkin, Caminiti, Walker, Vaughn Sosa, I-Rod,Jones, Giambi, and Kent all won MVPs in career seasons (well career years AT THAT TIME), while guys like Sheffield, Ramirez, Alomar, Piazza, Mcgwire, Bonds, Gwynn, Biggio, Belle, A-Rod, Bagwell, and Vlad were overlooked. perhaps they were taken for granted a bit, while the ones who snuck up and surprised people were given the hardware. It's almost like the voters were LOOKING for someone besides Bonds or Piazza, Griffey, or A-rod to give it to.
                Last edited by willshad; 04-23-2011, 10:09 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Mr. Red View Post
                  If there was a year where Mike Piazza deserved the MVP then it was 1997. In 2000, I think Todd Helton, Kent, Bonds, and several others were all more valuable than Piazza.
                  Piazza deserved the MVP more in 1996 than in 1997.

                  The Dodgers made the playoffs and Caminiti admitted to using steroids that year.

                  And Helton, Kent, and Bonds were not more valuable than Piazza. Take Piazza away from the Mets in 2000 and they don't make the post-season - let alone the World Series.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mr. Red View Post
                    If there was a year where Mike Piazza deserved the MVP then it was 1997. In 2000, I think Todd Helton, Kent, Bonds, and several others were all more valuable than Piazza.
                    What's the argument for Helton? Rockies didn't make the playoffs, and Coors Field was still a bandbox.
                    Last edited by redban; 04-23-2011, 10:26 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      You think Piazza is responsible for the 9 wins it would take for the Mets to drop out of the wildcard in 2000? That's a long way to fall, especially when Todd Pratt actually had quite a decent year as the oft-playing backup.

                      Even if you don't like Helton because his team missed the playoffs, there are still more valuable players on every playoff team, including Alfonzo for the Mets. Why does Piazza deserve it more than Alfonzo? Alfonzo hit nearly as well over 14 more games; about 100 more plate appearances and around 60 more at-bats. And he played better defense at another premium defensive position.
                      Last edited by Scoops; 04-23-2011, 10:48 PM.
                      sigpic
                      5.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by redban View Post
                        What's the argument for Helton? Rockies didn't make the playoffs, and Coors Field was still a bandbox.
                        Players have value even if the rest of their team isn't good, and Helton hit .353/.441/.633/1.074 on the road.
                        sigpic
                        5.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Scoops View Post
                          Players have value even if the rest of their team isn't good, and Helton hit .353/.441/.633/1.074 on the road.
                          Piazza hit .377 .459 .701 1.160 on the road (no that is not a misprint.)
                          He was a catcher, and Helton was a first baseman.
                          His team made the playoffs, Helton's didn't.

                          What is Helton's case over Piazza? That he handled first better than Piazza handled catcher? That he hit at Coors better than Piazza hit at Shea? Do you REALLY think that they were comparable as hitters? People don't realize just how much Piazza was killed by his home stadiums.
                          Last edited by willshad; 04-24-2011, 12:23 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by redban View Post
                            Piazza deserved the MVP more in 1996 than in 1997.

                            The Dodgers made the playoffs and Caminiti admitted to using steroids that year.

                            And Helton, Kent, and Bonds were not more valuable than Piazza. Take Piazza away from the Mets in 2000 and they don't make the post-season - let alone the World Series.
                            Actually I think 1995 was his year. I couldn't believe it when Larkin won, and Dante Bichette of all people finished second. What a joke. If you are the best hitter in the league from the catcher's spot, it better take a heck of a great season by someone else to be MVP over you. At least Walker has a legit monster season in 1997.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Dusty Baker did a bad thing and told the press Kent was deserving of the award (over Bonds) - he was manager for both

                              not only was there no basis for this based on real stats and on the field play, there was nothing intangible that Kent brought as a leader or teammate either

                              it unduly affected some of the voters
                              1. The more I learn, the more convinced I am that many players are over-rated due to inflated stats from offensive home parks (and eras)
                              2. Strat-O-Matic Baseball Player, Collector and Hobbyist since 1969, visit my strat site: http://forums.delphiforums.com/GamersParadise
                              3. My table top gaming blog: http://cary333.blogspot.com/

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X