Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Myths of the Black Sox

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Myths of the Black Sox

    I know I know just what we need another Black sox trial. But in this one lets try something different. Lets try and make this a warehouse of information on the black sox. Let us try and keep away from saying such and such happened therefore they are guilty and innocent and instead focus on the details. Whether they are credible or not. Whether or not they are actually true or theories and viewpoints that have been talked about so long that they have become the truth. If you wish to use some of these myths in a debate such as I think he is guilty because of myth #1 then please do so in another thread. We have many here on the Sox and anyone of them could house your argument without jumping topic. Let us just keep this to debating the myths.

    I'll start it off with some of the myths:

    1: Black Sox named because Comiskey wouldn't pay laundry bill, wanted players to, refused, uniforms got dirtier and dirtier press started calling them the Black Sox.
    Now so far I haven't found any primary sources that can actually verify this view. The first instance of the phrase Black Sox and pertaining to this team is after the story of the fix broke. Doesn't mean it isn't right, I'm still waiting on a few contacts to come through but I think this story is dubious.

    2: Joe Jackson asks to be benched before the series

    Not saying it isn't true but where are the primary sources. If I am reading Carney right the first time this story surfaces is around 1960 and Joe has been dead for awhile. In neither the GJ testimony nor the 1924 trial does Joe Jackson say I asked to be benched. At no time I believe is their every an interview in which Joe says I asked to be benched. Only after he is dead does this story surface. According to Carney neither Asinof or Frommer could cite sources for their view on this, nor does Asinof either say or remember exactly where he read that Joe asked to be bench. He just encountered it somewhere.

    3: Joe Jackson never touched the money once he got it
    According to Kate Jackson own testimony it was used before the 1924 trial. If he donated money after his death it wasn't the 5,000 dollars he got from 1919 it was money he had. Kate send she spent money on Joes sister who was sick. Carney makes the assumption that it was all spent on his sister and none on themselves. Perhaps he has more information then he printed but from what he printed I cannot make that assumption.


    4. Eddie Cicotte was snubbed out of a 30 win bonus by Comiskey who benched him at the end of the season to prevent paying him a bonus

    For starters Eddie did have a chance to make 30 wins but he was unable to do so. Secondly the mysterious absence of the starts at the end of the year is explained by the fact that he hurt his arm. With even Eddie telling reporters that during and after the time off. It wasn't Comiskey benching him for those couple of weeks but Eddie's arm keeping him off the rubber. Secondly the bonus theory was not one that was told by Eddie. I can find no primary sources that actually have him saying that or the bonus theory being told around the time of the fix. Again it is a theory told much much later on. Finally and probably most convincing to me is the HoF has in its possession records that tracked players salaries. A recorded history of what they were being paid, by whom, for how long, and what the bonuses were. On Eddies record there is no record of a bonus ever existing in either 1917 or 1919 or in any other year.

    5. Comiskey was a cheap SOB who paid his players peanuts
    Comiskey in fact had the highest payroll in the game, a fact that Carney presents. He had 3 players who were the highest paid for their position in the game.



    Feel free to add other myths you wish to discuss or discovered were not true. Things like the triples or attendance or "say it ain't so Joe" .
    Last edited by Ubiquitous; 05-07-2006, 11:04 AM.

  • #2
    If Collins was the highest paid 2B at $15K, and Schalk was the highest paid catcher, at around $9K, who was the 3rd highest paid at their position?

    Also it is quite possible to have 3 players paid adequately and the others not paid well at all. I think that part of the 'MYTH' requires more/better substantiation, in order to show that the owner wasn't cheap.

    In other words, 3 players are not a team. In order to substantiate the debunking, we need to see more information. In fact, 3 well paid players may well work AGAINST the others being compensated adequately. To assert that his payroll was the highest in the MLs, STILL doesn't mean he paid his OTHER players 'right'. Needs considerably more information to assert this as a proper, justified debunking.

    Bill Burgess

    Comment


    • #3
      Buck Weaver was the highest paid third basemen in the game.

      Who else deserves to be paid well? Joe Jackson and Eddie Cicotte right? After that there really is no one else that deserves it. Either because of youth, performance, or service time. Joe never signed a contract with Comiskey until after the 1919 season. Eddie set his own price level far below top pay and no real reason why it would be up there. He had a poor 1918 season so why would Comiskey be inclined to give Eddie top pay when he is A) going to be 35 and b)pitched poorly (or not as elite) in 1918?

      As research cited in Carney's book says, the White Sox had the highest payroll in the game. As Carney himself states Comiskey was not cheap by the standards of the day or compared to his fellow owners.

      Comment


      • #4
        I recently I got an email back from Carney about the black sox name. Unfortunately he too has run across the same stories I have with no primary sources to verify its use. I think he is getting some others on it as well to trace its roots.

        Comment


        • #5
          Did Comiskey make them pay for the laundering of thier uniforms?
          "I think about baseball when I wake up in the morning. I think about it all day and I dream about it at night. The only time I don't think about it is when I'm playing it."
          Carl Yastrzemski

          Comment


          • #6
            This article would seem to indicate that the press either didn't know or didnt report the laundering issue until after the trial started.





            Source: Chicago Daily Tribune (1872-1963). Chicago, Ill.: Jul 12, 1921. p. 3
            "I think about baseball when I wake up in the morning. I think about it all day and I dream about it at night. The only time I don't think about it is when I'm playing it."
            Carl Yastrzemski

            Comment


            • #7
              Great tidbit. I can see how the myth started taking shape,

              Comment


              • #8
                What could .50 cents buy you in 1919?

                I'm guessing at least a decent dinner.
                "I think about baseball when I wake up in the morning. I think about it all day and I dream about it at night. The only time I don't think about it is when I'm playing it."
                Carl Yastrzemski

                Comment


                • #9
                  a baseball ticket

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Ubiquitous

                    1: Black Sox named because Comiskey wouldn't pay laundry bill, wanted players to, refused, uniforms got dirtier and dirtier press started calling them the Black Sox.
                    Now so far I haven't found any primary sources that can actually verify this view. The first instance of the phrase Black Sox and pertaining to this team is after the story of the fix broke. Doesn't mean it isn't right, I'm still waiting on a few contacts to come through but I think this story is dubious.
                    don't know if this is important or not but the cultural encyclopedia of baseball says that the chicago players started jokingly referring to themselves as the black sox during the 1918 season because of the laundry dispute

                    if that is the case (especially if it was just an occasional flip remark) and the press never reported on it or got a hold of it - it seems possible that it could have been revived after the fix - especially considering how all scandals are reported - that is excessively with many, many tangents

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by bkmckenna
                      don't know if this is important or not but the cultural encyclopedia of baseball says that the chicago players started jokingly referring to themselves as the black sox during the 1918 season because of the laundry dispute

                      if that is the case (especially if it was just an occasional flip remark) and the press never reported on it or got a hold of it - it seems possible that it could have been revived after the fix - especially considering how all scandals are reported - that is excessively with many, many tangents
                      A reference to a dirty uniform as "black," which they look in many photographs, makes more sense than a reference to the fix as being "black."

                      I am surprised that one of the papers wouldn't have reported the tid bit in one of their baseball notes columns had a reporter gotten a hold of it. You find many references to seemingly obscure events in those notes and the reporters, from what I understand, were usually very close to the players on a day to day basis.
                      "I think about baseball when I wake up in the morning. I think about it all day and I dream about it at night. The only time I don't think about it is when I'm playing it."
                      Carl Yastrzemski

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by runningshoes53
                        I am surprised that one of the papers wouldn't have reported the tid bit in one of their baseball notes columns had a reporter gotten a hold of it. You find many references to seemingly obscure events in those notes and the reporters, from what I understand, were usually very close to the players on a day to day basis.
                        especially in baseball-frenzy chicago

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          One thing we should remember is that Comiskey had the reporters in his back pocket. A petty dispute like this, a dispute that would look unfavorably on Comiskey might very well be something reporters leave out to curry favor with Comiskey.


                          But it appears so far that almost nobody in the public called these guys the black sox before the scandal broke. They may very well have called each other that, but Joe Schmo sitting on the barstool wasn't. Not until after the scandal broke. Joe Schmo wasn't calling them the Black Sox becuase they looked dirty but because of the scandal.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Ubiquitous

                            But it appears so far that almost nobody in the public called these guys the black sox before the scandal broke. They may very well have called each other that, but Joe Schmo sitting on the barstool wasn't. Not until after the scandal broke. Joe Schmo wasn't calling them the Black Sox becuase they looked dirty but because of the scandal.
                            no doubt about that

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by runningshoes53
                              Did Comiskey make them pay for the laundering of thier uniforms?
                              players bore the expense for their own uniforms for many years - especially during the 19th century - not sure if they had to launder them but they surely paid for the uniforms themselves - not sure when all this changed - maybe someone knows

                              anyway it seems petty by comiskey if indeed it was true - the season was curtailed in 1918 (to 128 for chicago) which might have caused comiskey to be petty about expenses

                              i will say that he had little respect for his players by wwi - he publically singled out some of his men specifically as slackers for taking war-related work instead of enlisting

                              by the way - none of this mitigates what the chicago eight did

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X