Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

what are the worst MVP selections ever?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    '74 is a touch before my time as an active, attention paying fan but I am pretty sure that the Dodgers winning the NL pennant that year was a significant aspect of his MVP award and not just his traditional stats.
    "It's like watching a Western. It's slow, so you can watch the chess moves. Nothing seems to happen, but when it goes down, it goes down big." - Howard Bryant

    3 6 10 21 29 31 35 41 42 44 47

    Comment


    • #47
      It's very easy now to go back and look at numbers and say so and so should have won the MVP because of this stat and that number and these numbers over here and those stats over there, but sometimes you just had to live through a season and see the nuances of how a year may have unfolded to really know.
      Many times, as you know, it's not necessarily what you did but when you did it that matters to many voters. They cover teams and understand why a certain player was more valuable to his team for that particular season that we looking back can't figure out or understand.
      That being said, I thought Ron Guidry got ripped off the year Jim Rice won. Not that Rice didn't have a monster year but I thought without Guidry the Yankees are a distant also ran instead of the World Champions that they became.

      Comment


      • #48
        Chuck Klein in 1932. He was a total Baker Bowl fraud. His home/road split that year is laughable at best.

        Home: .423/.464/.799
        Road: .266/.340/.481


        Sure this was before they had home/road splits but couldn't anyone see that he was merely an average hitter who put up Jekyll and Hyde numbers only because of the joke of a park he played half of his games in?

        He almost won it in 1931 and 1933 as well when he came in 2nd both years in the MVP voting.

        1931
        Home: .401/.465/.740
        Road: .269/.327/.421

        1933
        Home: .467/.516/.789
        Road: .280/.338/.436

        I mean do you even need to look at home/road splits to realize that this guy is a fraud of the first degree? You would think the voters would realize this just from watching him play on the road day in and day out.
        Last edited by Joltin' Joe; 02-22-2012, 12:03 PM.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
          Edgar Martinez may have been even more deserving than Belle. But Vaughn was definitely not the right choice.

          Some other recent ones that come to mind are

          Juan Gonzalez in '96 and '98
          Pudge Rodriguez in '99 (probably about 6 or 7 more deserving players)
          Justin Morneau in '06 (Mauer or Jeter)
          Ichiro in '01 (116 win season and the novelty of a Japanese position player, but Giambi should have been the unanimous winner)
          Pedroia in '08 (Mauer was much better, but somehow Morneau came in 2nd place and got 7 first place votes.)

          It still boggles my mind that Justin Morneau finished in the top 2 in back-to-back seasons. He probably wasn't a top 15 position player in the AL in either season.
          Brett Boone was the best player on the 2001 116 win Mariners and he would have been a better MVP than Ichiro or Jason Giambi.

          stevegallanter.wordpress.com

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Steven Gallanter View Post
            Brett Boone was the best player on the 2001 116 win Mariners and he would have been a better MVP than Ichiro or Jason Giambi.

            stevegallanter.wordpress.com
            Back then, I thought it should've been Boone too. But now playing Monday morning quarterback, the right guy probably won as he was clean while the other two were not.

            Comment


            • #51
              I think we all have our preferences, so I limited mine to what I believe are five biggest snuffs:

              1934 Cochrane over Gomez- I actually made a thread on this, but I still stand in the opinion that Lefty's performance in batter-dominated Depression baseball outweighs Cochrane's misjudged season as a leader.

              1942 Gordon over Ted Williams

              1974 Garvey over Schmidt, Winn, or Bench

              1999 Rodriguez over Pedro Martinez

              2006 Morneau Jeter

              2011 gets a dishonorable mention because Kemp outclassed Braun in every way
              "Allen Sutton Sothoron pitched his initials off today."--1920s article

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
                Pedroia in '08 (Mauer was much better, but somehow Morneau came in 2nd place and got 7 first place votes.)
                I think Mauer's lack of power cost him along with the bogus Red Sox Nation support behind Pedroia
                "Allen Sutton Sothoron pitched his initials off today."--1920s article

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Tyrus4189Cobb View Post
                  I think we all have our preferences, so I limited mine to what I believe are five biggest snuffs:

                  1934 Cochrane over Gomez- I actually made a thread on this, but I still stand in the opinion that Lefty's performance in batter-dominated Depression baseball outweighs Cochrane's misjudged season as a leader.

                  1942 Gordon over Ted Williams

                  1974 Garvey over Schmidt, Winn, or Bench

                  1999 Rodriguez over Pedro Martinez

                  2006 Morneau Jeter

                  2011 gets a dishonorable mention because Kemp outclassed Braun in every way
                  Good list, Ty. I'd add one of my "favorites", which I previously mentioned. Willie Stargell (co- MVP in 1979 with Keith Hernandez). It's dangerous to use WAR as the selector for MVP, but it certainly makes sense that the MVP surely must reside among the top 5 or 10 in WAR totals. In 1979 Stargell had a WAR total of 2.3- yes, 2.3. I doubt that he was in the top 20 in the NL in WAR.

                  Without looking it up, I'd guess that Stargell may have had the lowest WAR total of any MVP.
                  Last edited by BigRon; 02-22-2012, 02:35 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    MVPs listed first....to me, Gehrig's 1934 season is one of the best ever. In 1934, Gehrig had 409 total bases to Cochrane's 180. Cochrane's WAR was 4.3 to Gehrig's 10.7. Listed below are their triple crowns stats. Gehrig won the Major League triple crown in 1934 as well, one of only 5 times that has been accomplished. And Lou finished 5th in the MVP race.



                    Players MVP/ ranking/ year/ HR/ RBI/ AVG
                    Mickey Cochrane 1 1934 2 76 .320
                    Lou Gehrig 5 49 165 .363

                    Marty Marion 1 1944 6 63 .267
                    Bill Nicholson 2 33 122 .287

                    Joe Gordan 1 1942 18 103 .322
                    Ted Williams 2 36 137 .356

                    Joe Dimaggio 1 1947 20 97 .315
                    Ted Williams 2 32 114 .343

                    Zoilo Versalles 1 1965 19 77 .273
                    Tony Oliva 2 16 98 .321

                    Joe Dimaggio 1 1941 30 125 .357
                    Ted Williams 2 37 120 .406

                    Miguel Tejada 1 2002 34 131 .308
                    Alex Rodriguez 2 57 142 .300

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Joltin' Joe View Post
                      Back then, I thought it should've been Boone too. But now playing Monday morning quarterback, the right guy probably won as he was clean while the other two were not.
                      I agree that Boone would have been a fine choice, but I still think Giambi should have won. Without Boone, the Mariners still win well over 100 games that year.
                      My top 10 players:

                      1. Babe Ruth
                      2. Barry Bonds
                      3. Ty Cobb
                      4. Ted Williams
                      5. Willie Mays
                      6. Alex Rodriguez
                      7. Hank Aaron
                      8. Honus Wagner
                      9. Lou Gehrig
                      10. Mickey Mantle

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by BigRon View Post
                        Without looking it up, I'd guess that Stargell may have had the lowest WAR total of any MVP.
                        I think you're right. After looking up some other possible candidates, I couldn't find anyone lower.
                        "Allen Sutton Sothoron pitched his initials off today."--1920s article

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          I am watching MLBN's "Prime 9." This episode features top 9 MVP snubs (players are only considered once).

                          9) 1997 Larry Walker over Mike Piazza- I agree with MLBN. Piazza played in a much tougher ballpark at a more valuable position.
                          8) 1952 Hank Sauer over Jackie Robinson- Here is where MLBN consultants aren't doing their homework. One historian (honestly the people at this site seem more intelligible than this man) notes how Sauer led in home runs and RBI, but shouldn't have been MVP because of his run-of-the-mill team. Then another "historian" discusses how Musial led in OPS, etc. Well, guess what? Voters were looking at homers and RBIs and average.
                          7) 1940 Frank McCormick over Johnny Mize- According to MLBN, the pennant race captured the voters' attention more.
                          6) 1962 Maury Wills over Willie Mays- Perhaps the stolen base record provided too much hype?
                          5) 1995 Mo Vaughn over Albert Belle- Personality triumphed over numbers
                          4) 1958 Jackie Jensen over Mickey Mantle- Mantle is coming off two huge years so he appears as "slipping." Less RBIs than Jensen, though he was walked way more with RISP, MLBN acknowledges.
                          3) 1944 Marty Marion over Stan Musial- Writers may have simply wanted to hand it to someone else because Musial had won it the year before. They may have wanted to avoid promoting one player.
                          2) 1934 Mickey Cochrane over Lou Gehrig- As we've discussed before, MLBN attributes the award to Cochrane's leadership as a manager. I still believe Lefty Gomez was the MVP, but I would prefer to at least see Gehrig. However, this snub is one seen more in hindsight IMO. Voters weren't really taking era into account, so they were going to consider a batter no more matter how favorable the hitting conditions. At the time, Cochrane wasn't a huge mistake (it still isn't) because he batted well for a team that won the pennant.
                          1) 1942 Joe Gordon over Ted Williams- Biggest snub ever. I was surprised to hear that Williams was on base for all but 11 games.

                          The list and reasonings belong to MLBN (unless I give my opinions otherwise). The more I think about these awards, the more they appear to be serving the voters' purposes than actually awarding the most valuable player. Then again, my cynicism runs deep.
                          "Allen Sutton Sothoron pitched his initials off today."--1920s article

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            The Cochrane choice has always confused me. If you are going to pick someone from the team, why not pick Gehringer, who had much better numbers, and also played a valuable defensive position? It's kind of silly that both of Cochrane's 2 MVPs came in seasons that were probably not among his top 7 seasons.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Tyrus4189Cobb View Post
                              7) 1940 Frank McCormick over Johnny Mize- According to MLBN, the pennant race captured the voters' attention more.
                              .
                              What pennant race? The Reds won the NL pennant easily in 1940. The pennant race that season was in the AL between the Tigers, Indians and Yankees. 1940 was unusual in that era because there was a race in the AL and no race in the NL.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Vaughn over Belle still annoys me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X