Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Greatest Baserunner of All Time? A completely new take...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by ol' aches and pains View Post
    I couldn't agree more, Manny was everything that's wrong with baseball in one convenient, easy to hate package. When he came back from his first suspension in LA, and called a press conference, and sat up there with dark sunglasses on, gloating and saying "it's showtime", I just wanted to puke.

    And Ed T. is spot on as to his defense and baserunning skills. He obviously saw him play more than I did, but it seemed to me his philosophy of baserunning was "run until you get thrown out".
    And coming full circle, that reminds me of an image/hype monger whose philosophy was "I'll trot into second when I could definitely try for third, or jog half-speed around first when I should be running for a double."

    (Now let's watch, bemused, while the Rickey trolls scramble to explain what was obvious to everyone, for 25 years).

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by csh19792001 View Post

      Bottom line? "Guess you had to be there", as they say.
      I'm too interested in this forum to lose access due to you. If you choose to use blind hatred as a means to make evaluations, then so be it. There's nothing new to see here.
      "It's better to look good, than be good."

      Comment


      • #63
        Dated, but Crawford is still one of the best in the world:

        Jayson Stark (ESPN), Ranking the best baserunners: 8/19/2005:

        CARL CRAWFORD, DEVIL RAYS

        Some guys show up faster on the stopwatch, home to first. But Crawford is the most exhilarating runner in the game, home-to-third or first-to-the-plate.

        WHICH IS MORE INTIMIDATING -- SPEED OR POWER?

        THE CASE FOR SPEED: "To me," said Houston GM Tim Purpura, "power is almost a one-on-one game. It's all about the pitcher-hitter confrontation. Whereas speed affects everybody. It makes all the fielders a little more on their guard. It creates more mistakes. And the pitcher can really get out of sync when those things happen."

        THE CASE FOR POWER: "Speed can be unnerving, but I'll take power," said Toronto GM J.P. Ricciardi. "Speed is like slow death. You're throwing over. You're holding guys on. You're stepping out. The whole game slows down. Power is quick death. One swing, and you're done. If I had a choice, I'd take power. You look at teams like the Red Sox and Yankees, with all their power. If you don't throw strikes, that power will end up crushing you. When you put those guys on base, they kill you with the three-run homer. That's more dangerous to me than a team like the Devil Rays that tries to create havoc by running the bases. If guys don't get on base, speed is a nonfactor."
        SPEEDY STATS: Over the last three seasons, Crawford has 148 steals and 41 triples. Devil Rays media-relations genius Rick Vaughn reports that only four players in history ever matched those numbers over any three-year stretch -- Juan Samuel (1984-86), Max Carey (1922-24), Ty Cobb (six times) and Honus Wagner (three times). ... Just two players since 1900 had more steals and triples than Crawford (157 SB, 46 triples) before turning 24 (which Crawford did this month) -- Ty Cobb (254 and 63) and Sherry Magee (200 and 65). ... Needs three triples to become the first player with back-to-back seasons of 15-plus triples since Jim Rice in 1977-78. And 16 more steals could make him the first with back-to-back 50-steal, 15-triple seasons since Cobb (1911-12-13).

        HOWWWWW FAST IS HE?: Crawford is the ultimate "triple" threat. He has hit at least one triple in 18 consecutive months, if you don't count his two games in Japan in March 2004. (Next-longest streak is five, by Juan Pierre -- eight if you don't count his three games last October.) ... Not a home-to-first sprint champ (timed at 3.95-4.0). But that's misleading. "I don't know if he's lightning fast, but he's quicker than everyone else," Stanton said. "He hits those triples because he does it right off the bat." ... "He runs funny," Lofton said. "But man, he runs fast."

        QUICK REVIEWS: "When Carl Crawford runs, he looks like a runaway hub cap," Donnelly quipped. "Ever seen a hub cap rolling downhill, leaning to one side? That's him." ... "Best baserunner in the league and best base stealer in the league," said one scout. ... "He hit a triple against us one time," Donnelly said, "and I swear his feet only hit the ground four times. We had skid marks on the infield."

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by drstrangelove View Post
          I'm too interested in this forum to lose access due to you. If you choose to use blind hatred as a means to make evaluations, then so be it. There's nothing new to see here.
          I've been contributing here for 10 years. Much of it, like the Hal Chase thread, or the litany of other threads I've "bumped up" so they would not be clandestinely lost to cyberspace is but one piece of evidence as to to just how much interest and time I've dedicated to this forum. Hundreds, if not thousands of hours of debate, toil, and research.....just on this very history forum!!

          If you're going to plead about your indemnity and dedication to this forum, please at least spare us veterans and genuine historians the whining in the event you get screwed into the ground in a debate (i.e., Rickey Henderson being an amazing baserunner and a hard nosed, hustling baseball player).

          Post Script- There is plenty new to discuss and learn here, on nearly a daily basis on this forum. Stick around awhile...hopefully you can share in it with this cadre of die-hards here, and reciprocate the enrichment we share de vez en cuando.
          Last edited by csh19792001; 02-17-2012, 09:40 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by csh19792001 View Post
            I've been contributing here for 10 years. Much of it, like the Hal Chase thread, or the litany of other threads I've "bumped up" so they would not be clandestinely lost to cyberspace is but one piece of evidence as to to just how much interest and time I've dedicated to this forum. Hundreds, if not thousands of hours of debate, toil, and research.....just on this very history forum!!

            If you're going to plead about your indemnity and dedication to this forum, please at least spare us veterans and genuine historians the whining in the event you get screwed into the ground in a debate (i.e., Rickey Henderson being an amazing baserunner and a hard nosed, hustling baseball player).

            Post Script- There is plenty new to discuss and learn here, on nearly a daily basis on this forum. Stick around awhile...hopefully you can share in it with this cadre of die-hards here, and reciprocate the enrichment we share de vez en cuando.
            If you can't recognize that Henderson is one of the best base runners of all time then I assume it's because you simply hate him and as a result you refuse to accept the facts.

            You've replied to nothing that's been posted to demonstrate how great he was.
            You've replied to nothing explaining the erroneous methodology you're employing.
            You made up your own definition of base running skill that is employed by no one but you and spout it as if it's a useful tool.

            Grats on making thousands of posts and being here for years. That is as meaningful as your last post. I quoted your last one by the way and it demonstrates not research or discussion but sarcasm, condescension and entitlement.

            I'll re-state what I said earlier, since it was ignored.

            As far as you are concerned, it would not matter if Henderson had stolen 2nd, 3rd and home each and every time he got a walk, single, double or triple. You would still consider the catcher who hit 5 triples and stolen 7 bases as a better base runner.

            Do I have it right?
            Last edited by drstrangelove; 02-17-2012, 10:30 PM.
            "It's better to look good, than be good."

            Comment


            • #66
              If someone thinks that Mike Heath and Rickey Henderson are similar hitters or that all hitters hit the same then, well, I don't really care what their opinion is since they don't really know or understand baseball. Vendettas are nice and all but I don't have to follow along and play that game.

              Comment


              • #67
                Quotes about Rickey Henderson:

                Joe Morgan: "(Rickey) ran the bases unbelievably well. You (Rickey) are in my opinion one of the top 5 greatest players of all time." (From Joe Morgan's Radio show broadcast 9/8/11.)

                Tony LaRussa: "Carney (Lansford) pops behind first base, Ricky tags up and scores. Nobody scores (on that.) He makes a Rickey run. We call them Rickey runs because he makes runs no one can make." You Tube Tony LaRussa on Rickey Henderson.

                Carlton Fisk: "Well, he's the all-time greatest runner. Base runner." Carlton Fisk on You Tube talks about Rickey Henderson.

                Gary Carter: "He was a master at reading the pitcher."

                Bill James: "Without exaggerating one inch, you could find fifty Hall of Famers who, all taken together, don't own as many important records, as Rickey Henderson."

                My favorite quote:

                Bill James: "If you could split him in two, you'd have two Hall of Famers."

                Yea, I'm going to wuss out and side with Morgan, LaRussa, Carter, Fisk and James. I think they a know a little something about the game. I'm glad my opinion (based completely on numbers) is backed up by them based completely on studying and playing the game.
                Last edited by drstrangelove; 02-18-2012, 08:00 AM.
                "It's better to look good, than be good."

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by csh19792001 View Post
                  Of course not! That's because you and your crony here look at raw numbers and draw all your conclusions from them.

                  The fact that guys like Lloyd Moseby, Brady Anderson, and dozens of others with half his AB's and the same number of triples... who played in his timeframe, in his league, with probably a fraction of his speed, OUT RAN him, and, ispo facto, were better baserunners, overall, than he was. Unless one is dumb enough to have never played competitive baseball, AND/OR never actually watched it, and don't get what "hustle" is.

                  That the slow RH catcher ON HIS OWN TEAM (Mike Friggin Heath!) outran and outhustled him....well, that says it all.

                  Bottom line? "Guess you had to be there", as they say.
                  As Drstrangelove said, getting to second or third is what counts, whether you take an extra base on the hit or whether you steal it. Not only that, the more hits you stretch, the more you get thrown out. If you're the greatest base-stealer in the history of the world, the absolutely dumbest thing you can do is get thrown out at second on a stretched single or at third on a stretched double. It makes absolutely perfect sense for Rickey's double and triple numbers to be relatively low.

                  His state of mind is irrelevant. He made the smart play.
                  Indeed the first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already; so that no blight can so surely arrest all intellectual growth as the blight of cocksureness.--CS Peirce

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Jackaroo Dave View Post
                    As Drstrangelove said, getting to second or third is what counts, whether you take an extra base on the hit or whether you steal it. Not only that, the more hits you stretch, the more you get thrown out. If you're the greatest base-stealer in the history of the world, the absolutely dumbest thing you can do is get thrown out at second on a stretched single or at third on a stretched double. It makes absolutely perfect sense for Rickey's double and triple numbers to be relatively low.

                    His state of mind is irrelevant. He made the smart play.
                    I have to agree with this. Rickey played to his strength. As long as he made it around the bases, who cares how he did it?
                    He scored more runs than anybody in history, that's good enough for me.
                    Shalom, y'all!
                    What's the rumpus?

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Jackaroo Dave View Post
                      Rickey Henderson's state of mind was irrelevant.
                      I have to apologize, but vehemently disagree, as a lifelong athlete and ballplayer through college. If your lens is derived entirely- or almost entirely- from the sabermetric perspective, than I see where you're coming from. Runs in, runs out...(doesn't matter how things happened, whatsoever.)

                      In the real world of higher level competitive baseball, however.....the one vied for on the actual diamond, in the dirt, and on the basepaths, terms like "intent" and "hustle" are tremendously important. They are imbued with value, credited directly and indirectly on the field and in the clubhouses, to the teammates, coaches, GM's, and to the owners. They often determine who is cut, who stays on the roster, and who is demoted or cut.

                      Selfishness is abhorred, and the converse appropriately lauded. I suppose for those who never made it past, say, 7th grade baseball, these ARE abstractions. No fault there, we all skills and deficiencies, but please be aware of just how much you don't know if you were not a competitive ballplayer for years playing at a higher level than Little League (at a minimum!).

                      Rickey Henderson could have hustled one HELL of a lot more, and perhaps he wouldn't be regarded as (perhaps) the ultimate "hot-dog" jack*** in modern baseball history had he tried harder. Instead of having as many triples as Lloyd Moseby and Brady Anderson, and as many doubles as guys with HALF his at bats, maybe he could have actually BLANKING HUSTLED. But he didn't. He ran to run up his SB totals. Always. All ego. I remember Harold Reynolds relaying a story on Baseball Tonight...he got a personal phone call from the Rickey when Harold won the SB crown in 1987....Rickey said "Guy leading the league with SIXTY stolen bases! You kiddin me, boy!" (Click). Reynolds said he barked that at him, hung up the phone.

                      That was Rickey.

                      Tremendous basestealer, yet, ironically not even a tremendous baserunner, or even close!! Paul Molitor, for example, exposed him for the lazy baserunnner and consummately selfish player he was. Willie Mays, Willie Wilson...same case. Rickey's double and triples rates are awful. He didn't run hard out of the box, or rounding the bases. Period.

                      And that "is what it is", as they say.
                      Last edited by csh19792001; 02-29-2012, 04:34 PM.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        [to CSH]

                        I guess Rickey was just lucky, then, in that his character deficiencies made him a smarter baserunner. Don't worry about hurting my feelings as a non-athlete. I disagree with Gene Mauch, for pete's sake.
                        Indeed the first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already; so that no blight can so surely arrest all intellectual growth as the blight of cocksureness.--CS Peirce

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Jackaroo Dave View Post
                          [to CSH]

                          I guess Rickey was just lucky, then, in that his character deficiencies made him a smarter baserunner. Don't worry about hurting my feelings as a non-athlete. I disagree with Gene Mauch, for pete's sake.
                          I think his incredible natural speed made him the greatest base stealer of all time, however his obvious patently obvious character (and intellectual) deficiencies prevented him for being a much better base runner. Hell, Rickey should have been the best base runner that ever lived.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Ubiquitous View Post
                            On padding:
                            Yep, on padding....Rickey always ran... when it mattered....and often when it didn't. That's why he's 500 steals ahead of Brock.

                            Rickey was somewhat like like Pete Rose (or maybe Ichiro) with hits....procure as many as possible, regardless of whether it was pertinent to the outcome of the game. Ichiro bunted in a few situations in 04' when it was completely unwarranted and probably (on average) would have hurt his team's chances of winning. In 78', Rose (biggest ego, stat ***** in history) laid down a bunt in a situation to keep his steak alive. Later, when his streak got stopped at 44, the hick had the audacity/idiocy to complain that he wasn't getting enough good pitches/fastballs to hit. (As if the other team should have been catering to his own personal statistical pursuit.)

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              I'd call this: The Quintessence of Rickey


                              Article, Davey vs. Rickey, Ten Years After


                              Ten years ago this weekend, Davey Lopes and Rickey Henderson had a little Code-related run-in. It would quickly turn into one of the most prominent kerfluffles in the recent history of the unwritten rules, sufficiently noteworthy to lead a chapter about when and when not to steal in a certain book devoted to the subject.

                              Similar situations still come up all the time. (Look no further than Carlos Gomez or A.J. Ellis earlier this year, or Nyjer Morgan‘s antics last season.) Still, in honor of the grandaddy moment of them all, it seems worth revisiting. From The Baseball Codes:

                              In July 2001, Rickey Henderson was forty-two years old and, by an enormous margin, baseball’s all-time stolen-base leader. The San Diego Padres outfielder was well over two decades into his major-league career and had long since been anointed the greatest leadoff hitter of all time. Then he stole second base against the Brewers, and Milwaukee manager Davey Lopes exploded.

                              It wasn’t just any steal that set Lopes off—it happened in the seventh inning of a game in which the Padres led 12–5, after Milwaukee’s defense had essentially cried “uncle” by positioning first baseman Richie Sexson in the hole behind Henderson instead of holding him on. The play was so borderline, as far as stolen bases go, that it was ruled defensive indifference, and Henderson wasn’t even credited with a steal. That wasn’t his goal, however. Henderson was approaching Ty Cobb’s all-time record for runs scored (which he would ultimately best in the season’s final week), and he had just put himself into scoring position.

                              Lopes could not have been less interested in the runner’s motivation. As soon as Henderson reached second, Lopes went to the mound, ostensibly to talk to pitcher Ray King but really to direct a tirade up the middle. At top volume and with R-rated vocabulary, Lopes informed Henderson that he had just become a target for the Brewers pitching staff.

                              “I didn’t appreciate what he did,” Lopes told reporters after the game. “I know he’s trying to obtain a record for most runs scored, but do it the right way. If he keeps doing stuff like that he’s going to get one of his play*ers hurt. I just told him to stay in the game because he was going on his ass. We were going to drill him, flat out. I told him that. But he chose not to stay in the game; I knew he wouldn’t.”

                              Henderson was removed after the inning by Padres manager Bruce Bochy, which the skipper insisted had to do with the lopsided score, not Lopes’s threats. Afterward, Henderson said that he was reluctantly fol*lowing green-light orders given to him by third-base coach Tim Flannery and sanctioned by Bochy, and that showing anybody up was the last thing on his mind. “Davey and I argued, but I told him that on my own, in that situation, I wouldn’t go down and steal that base,” he said. (“Rickey said I gave him the sign?” said a surprised Flannery when he heard Henderson’s take. “Rickey didn’t even know the sign.”)

                              “To be blunt, what he did was ********,” said King after the game. “We weren’t holding him on. If he’s going to break the record that way, he doesn’t deserve it. The guy’s probably going in the Hall of Fame, but to try to get to second base just to score a run, that’s sorry. When he took off I said, ‘You’ve got to be kidding.’ ”

                              What Henderson had done was break one of the cornerstone entries in baseball’s unwritten rulebook: Don’t play aggressively with a big lead late in the game. It’s tantamount to running up the score in football, and no tenet of the Code is more simultaneously revered and loathed. It means the cessation of stolen-base attempts, sending runners in search of extra bases, swinging at 3-0 pitches, and an assortment of other tactics aimed toward scoring at all costs.

                              “There is no excuse that can be made up to justify trying to show some*one up,” said Hall of Fame manager Sparky Anderson, one of the Code’s staunchest practitioners in his twenty-five years at the helm of the Cincinnati Reds and Detroit Tigers. “There’s no excuse, and you can’t invent one.”

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by csh19792001 View Post
                                Yep, on padding....Rickey always ran... when it mattered....and often when it didn't. That's why he's 500 steals ahead of Brock.
                                As I have shown several times now his base stealing rate was in line with league averages.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X