I'd meant to start a new one sooner, but I was busy with other things. A brief recap of the idea, copied from the original thread:
If you saw them play, who did you think was better? It's a limited question, since many didn't have the luxury of seeing many of these players' games. The idea is that if you followed baseball when they played, who did you think was better back then? Don't vote on who you think was better now, but who you thought was better back then. There are no winners or losers, so the polls should stay open. And please, only those who followed baseball when they played should vote. I encourage anyone to participate in the discussion though.
I was following baseball when Carter and Fisk played, but only during the last few years of their careers. Because of that sample size, I am disqualifying myself from voting. But others can make their own decisions on what sample size they feel is appropriate, as long as they followed baseball when Carter and Fisk played. Again, the honor system is in play here.
If you saw them play, who did you think was better? It's a limited question, since many didn't have the luxury of seeing many of these players' games. The idea is that if you followed baseball when they played, who did you think was better back then? Don't vote on who you think was better now, but who you thought was better back then. There are no winners or losers, so the polls should stay open. And please, only those who followed baseball when they played should vote. I encourage anyone to participate in the discussion though.
I was following baseball when Carter and Fisk played, but only during the last few years of their careers. Because of that sample size, I am disqualifying myself from voting. But others can make their own decisions on what sample size they feel is appropriate, as long as they followed baseball when Carter and Fisk played. Again, the honor system is in play here.
Comment