Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Difference between a great hitter and a great offensive player

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Difference between a great hitter and a great offensive player

    For example, nearly everyone considers Tony Gwynn a great hitter. However, someone like Jim Thome is never called a great hitter, despite his excellent power and ability to get on base. So I ask, does that make him a great "offensive player" and not a great "hitter"? Is there a difference between a great "hitter", and a great "offensive player"? Who would you rather have at the plate, someone like Jim Thome, or someone like Tony Gwynn?
    Last edited by fenrir; 05-10-2012, 06:58 PM.

  • #2
    To me a great "offensive player" is a player like Rickey Henderson in his prime or Joe Morgan circa 1975-76 or the early 1990's version of Barry Bonds. This type of player hits for average, hits for power, draws lots of walks, and steals lots of bases at a very high success.
    Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by fenrir View Post
      However, someone like Jim Thome is never called a great hitter
      I don't know too many people that would not consider Thome to be a great hitter.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Joltin' Joe View Post
        I don't know too many people that would not consider Thome to be a great hitter.
        Honestly, I've rarely heard anyone call Thome a great hitter, and in general he's not considered at the level of someone like Tony Gwynn, though he's probably been more valuable offensively. Mark Mcgwire is another example (ignoring steroids). I don't think he was ever thought of as a "Great hitter", but most certainly a great "offensive player".
        Last edited by fenrir; 05-10-2012, 06:51 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
          To me a great "offensive player" is a player like Rickey Henderson in his prime or Joe Morgan circa 1975-76 or the early 1990's version of Barry Bonds. This type of player hits for average, hits for power, draws lots of walks, and steals lots of bases at a very high success.
          Would you consider someone like Mark Mcgwire a "great hitter", or a great "offensive player"? Or neither?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by fenrir View Post
            Would you consider someone like Mark Mcgwire a "great hitter", or a great "offensive player"? Or neither?
            I think traditionally the term "great hitter" or "pure hitter" was used to describe hitters with high batting average whether they hit for power or whether they draw walks or not. That is Tony Gwynn to a tee. When I was a kid Rod Carew was often called the best pure hitter in the AL. Mark McGwire is closer to "great offensive player" than "great hitter" IMO.
            Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
              I think traditionally the term "great hitter" or "pure hitter" was used to describe hitters with high batting average whether they hit for power or whether they draw walks or not. That is Tony Gwynn to a tee. When I was a kid Rod Carew was often called the best pure hitter in the AL. Mark McGwire is closer to "great offensive player" than "great hitter" IMO.
              That distinction is reflected in the language. We have long-standing, commonplace distinguishing terms, 'slugger' and 'power hitter' for batters whose strong suit is power, but I can think of nothing comparable for the high-average specialist. The default image of a 'hitter' is someone with a high BA.
              Indeed the first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already; so that no blight can so surely arrest all intellectual growth as the blight of cocksureness.--CS Peirce

              Comment


              • #8
                I think for the most part, a 'great hitter' is defined by batting average. If he can hit for average and also add power, then he is an even greater hitter. When we add walks and steals to the equation, it becomes more of an 'offensive player' thing.

                A guy who hits for a great average, but with not much in the way of power, walks, or steals, can be considered a great hitter (think Gwynn or Mauer), but a guy who doesn't hit for average, but does everything else will not be considered one (think Jim Wynn).

                I don't think anyone ever called Rickey Henderson a 'great hitter'.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by willshad View Post
                  I think for the most part, a 'great hitter' is defined by batting average. If he can hit for average and also add power, then he is an even greater hitter. When we add walks and steals to the equation, it becomes more of an 'offensive player' thing.

                  A guy who hits for a great average, but with not much in the way of power, walks, or steals, can be considered a great hitter (think Gwynn or Mauer), but a guy who doesn't hit for average, but does everything else will not be considered one (think Jim Wynn).

                  I don't think anyone ever called Rickey Henderson a 'great hitter'.
                  yeah. the great hitter is usually attributed to a guy who can do it all: get on base, hit for power and high average. guys like cabrera, pujols, gehrig, ruth, williams are such guys. those guys are challenging the triple crown.

                  and then there are those who are "just" great sluggers. this guy is only hitting .240-.280 but might walk a lot and hit a lot of HRs. examples are mcgwire, killebrew or reggie jackson.

                  Most guys would prefer having the triple crown guy like ruth, williams or cabrera because there is a higher chance he gets a hit. but the pure slugger is ver dangerous too.
                  I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Another example I've used before is Ichiro Suzuki vs. Bobby Abreu. 99% of people would tell you that Ichiro is the better hitter, but Bobby Abreu was clearly a better offensive player for most of his career.
                    My top 10 players:

                    1. Babe Ruth
                    2. Barry Bonds
                    3. Ty Cobb
                    4. Ted Williams
                    5. Willie Mays
                    6. Alex Rodriguez
                    7. Hank Aaron
                    8. Honus Wagner
                    9. Lou Gehrig
                    10. Mickey Mantle

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I would not call a high average hitter that does nothing else a great hitter. But I would not call the .250 hitter that jacks 50 a great hitter either. They are still effective but to be really great you need to do it all (power,average, walk).

                      We are always talking about high average, low walks vs the opposite but the real great hitters are not (prime) Adam Dunn types. They hit for power, walk AND hit for average.
                      I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Then you have the phrase "professional hitter" which I detest. Managers and GM's always use this phrase to describe a hitter that hits for a BA but doesn't walk or hit for power. Freddy Sanchez is a classic example of the "professional hitter".
                        Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
                          Then you have the phrase "professional hitter" which I detest. Managers and GM's always use this phrase to describe a hitter that hits for a BA but doesn't walk or hit for power. Freddy Sanchez is a classic example of the "professional hitter".
                          Haha, I totally agree.

                          Who would you put in the 'Professional Hitters'" Hall of Fame? (if such a thing existed)


                          Some candidates that come to mind:

                          Freddy Sanchez
                          Mark Grudzielanek
                          Sean Casey
                          Randy Winn
                          Darin Erstad
                          David DeJesus
                          My top 10 players:

                          1. Babe Ruth
                          2. Barry Bonds
                          3. Ty Cobb
                          4. Ted Williams
                          5. Willie Mays
                          6. Alex Rodriguez
                          7. Hank Aaron
                          8. Honus Wagner
                          9. Lou Gehrig
                          10. Mickey Mantle

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
                            Haha, I totally agree.

                            Who would you put in the 'Professional Hitters'" Hall of Fame? (if such a thing existed)


                            Some candidates that come to mind:

                            Freddy Sanchez
                            Mark Grudzielanek
                            Sean Casey
                            Randy Winn
                            Darin Erstad
                            David DeJesus
                            Hahahaha! Hmmmmm...A good list. I think Matt Stairs was sometimes referred to a "professional hitter" which was odd because Stairs didn't hit for a high BA, drew walks, and hit for power. Stair is the anti-professional hitter!
                            Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Semantics. Who would I rather have? Whichever produced the most runs created, regardless of how.
                              1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                              1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                              1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                              The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                              The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X