Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

All-Star game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • MLB4LYF
    replied
    I still enjoy watching the game, but it doesn't mean so much to me now as it did say back in the 70's and the early 80's. Even though now it means that the winner has home team advantage in the World Series, it just doesn't have the lustre, that it once did for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tyrus4189Cobb
    replied
    I complain about it before, after, and during. Nothing's ever gonna change me watching it, though.


    Originally posted by Blackout View Post
    my tv channels go up to the 1900s now with lots of junk inbetween
    And here I am getting zapped by endless Philco electrons still hoping for new Columbo episodes.

    Leave a comment:


  • SamtheBravesFan
    replied
    The issues are different for every person. I, for one, don't particularly care for the spectacle around it, like right now, with the new American idol winner singing some song he wrote and an hour-long pregame show like it's the Super Bowl and some important game other than an exhibition.

    However, I still care about the game. I still see it for what it is: an exhibition contest between teams made from both leagues' players. That's all it is. Strip away all the bells, whistles and window dressing and the spirit of the game is still there.
    Last edited by SamtheBravesFan; 07-10-2012, 04:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Blackout
    replied
    my tv channels go up to the 1900s now with lots of junk inbetween


    all i care to watch is Family Guy, Cleveland Show and sports


    anyways back to the OG topic the ASG is still kickass.

    Leave a comment:


  • EdTarbusz
    replied
    In 1990 our house had about 50 channels. Ten years before that we had six.

    Leave a comment:


  • GiambiJuice
    replied
    Originally posted by redban View Post
    Here are the ratings for all the all-star games going back to 1967:

    http://www.baseball-almanac.com/asgbox/asgtv.shtml

    It drew around 20.0 consistently until the 1990s came along. Then it took a sharp nosedive.

    16.2 in 1990; 13.9 in 1995; 10.1 in 2000; 6.9 in 2011 (record low)

    So yes, I'd guess modern technology is the cause. People see all the players yearly, with shows like SportsCenter and such.
    Also, fans have a lot more options on TV nowadays. How many channels were available in 1990?

    Leave a comment:


  • redban
    replied
    Here are the ratings for all the all-star games going back to 1967:

    http://www.baseball-almanac.com/asgbox/asgtv.shtml

    It drew around 20.0 consistently until the 1990s came along. Then it took a sharp nosedive.

    16.2 in 1990; 13.9 in 1995; 10.1 in 2000; 6.9 in 2011 (record low)

    So yes, I'd guess modern technology is the cause. People see all the players yearly, with shows like SportsCenter and such.

    Leave a comment:


  • chicagowhitesox1173
    replied
    I would say baseball's allstar game started to change in the mid to late 80's and by the 90's I dont think too many people cared for it. I haven't really watched one since the early 80's. Yeah I think interleague play really killed the allstar game at least for me it did.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jroll
    started a topic All-Star game

    All-Star game

    When did people really stop caring about it? Does it have to do with the fact that everyone already gets to see all the great players with satellite and ESPN and Interleague play? I'd also point out that its not just baseball, but all the sports. The NFL might do away with the pro-bowl, the skill competition may be more popular among hockey fans then the all star game and the NBAs isn't the same either. When did this start to change?

Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X