Originally posted by pheasant
View Post
Going to point out a factor I often insert when Joe Dimaggio is the subject, Joe was a right handed batter.
We keep seeing on this board, factors that effect hitting and pitching and that are always factored in when ranking players...era played in, park factors, rule changes and others. Why is which side of the plate not considered, the numbers show the obvious, RH batters have the more unfavorable condition.
I usually don't get much feedback whan I bring up conditions, not just for Joe but all RH batters and the fact that being that there are more RH pitchers in the game, more so years ago. And that has an effect on RH batter, LH hitters historically have the more favorable condition.
Here is again, look at the list, only one RH batter on that list, despite the fact that there were historically more RH batters in the game.
Top ten career batting average.........7 out of the 10 are left handed batters.
Since Joe's first year 1936 to the year 2006...........batters with a career BA. over .300
LH batters career .300 or better--.344---.338---.331---.328---.328
RH batters career .300 or better..............only one, Joe Dimaggio .325.
Lets stop selling this guy short. Played in a park death on RH hitters, RH batter facing lots of pitchers pitching from the same side RH.
Short career counts against him but I wonder how many RH batters since 1936 that had a 13 year span "within" their career had .325 over 13 seasons in that time period. Maybe Foxx, Medwick a few others.
Take your pick, LH batter were just born better hitters or the fact that there have been more RH pitcher in the game favored LH batters...........easy choice.
Comment