Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

2013 World Baseball Classic

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2013 World Baseball Classic

    Yea,I know the 09 WBC is not over and it too soon to talk about the 2013 WBC but I like talk a little bit about 2013 WBC. one thing I like to ask if they should they move the WBC and have it in Nov and DEC??? And they may have over 26 teams next time around so what countries you think could get pick??

  • #2
    I don't think the next WBC will expand to 26 teams, maybe the next WBC will increase 4 more teams
    Maybe Nicaragua, Colombia, Spain, Philippines...

    Comment


    • #3
      about the expanding participants subject,

      26 can't be a good number.


      assuming that each group contains 4 countries, the total number of participants has to be the multiplication of 4.

      thus, either 24 (4 x 6 ) or 28 ( 4 x 7)

      latter 28 (4 x 7 ) won't be a good choice since the 2nd round will usually start with 2 teams advanced from each group, but teams advanced from 7th group won't have the pair.

      so, I think if there is expansion in 2013, it will be 24 teams total or 32.


      32 is good number (FIFA use it for world cup) but then, there aren't many countries out there that can be fit into 32.


      24, however, I think it is possible.


      24 teams (4 teams in each pool, and there will be 6 pool)

      2 teams advance from each group (12 advanced team total) and select 4 teams from wild cards and let 16 countries divided into another group of 4. (2nd round)

      and 8 teams advance from the 2nd round, and from there, they should do one-game elimination till the final.



      it is just one of my ideas that i thought of when the group for 2009 was announced.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ROC~~ View Post
        I don't think the next WBC will expand to 26 teams, maybe the next WBC will increase 4 more teams
        Maybe Nicaragua, Colombia, Spain, Philippines...
        The Philippines? What about Germany, Brazil or other countries with better track records?

        Comment


        • #5
          I would like to see atleast 20 teams next time (didnt they say they were thining of doing 24 with qualis?)

          I also want the elimination style format to stay with either double elimination or triple in each pool. I would figured out the math on either if the WBC moved to more teams but I'm getting to class now.

          Also, if it's just increased to 20, I would still want the 2013 to be invitations, I don't think the WBC is ready to have 24 teams and to have qualis just yet. If I had to select 4 more teams it would be...

          -1 more European-Germany, Spain, Czech
          -2 more Americas-Brazil, Columbia, Nicaruaga, or anyone else that skips my mind
          -1 more Asian-Thailand, Phillippines, India, etc

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cutchemist42 View Post
            Also, if it's just increased to 20, I would still want the 2013 to be invitations, I don't think the WBC is ready to have 24 teams and to have qualis just yet. If I had to select 4 more teams it would be...
            The 2009 Baseball World Cup will have 22 teams and there are a couple like Panama and Brazil which are as good as some of the 22 which are included.

            -1 more European-Germany, Spain, Czech
            -2 more Americas-Brazil, Columbia, Nicaruaga, or anyone else that skips my mind
            -1 more Asian-Thailand, Phillippines, India, etc
            India almost never plays in the Asian Championships even. Thailand or the Philippines if you need a 5th Asian team.

            Curacao's team separate from the regular Dutch team would be better than Colombia, as they showed in the 2008 Americas Baseball Cup - guys like Ardley Jansen, Randolph Kirindongo, Lorvin Louisa, Johnny Gregorius, etc.

            Comment


            • #7
              The only number I've seen reported for the 2013 WBC is 24 teams. The WBC Committe apparently voted to consider expanding the tournament to 24 teams and to have qualifying rounds. It's not clear to me whether the qualifying rounds will have 24 teams, or whether the qualifying rounds will be open to more teams with the main tournament capped at 24 teams. I can see it going either way.

              Assuming the tournament will include 24 invited teams, here's how I think it should shake out:

              Add to the existing 16 teams the following 8 countries:

              (1) Colombia
              (2) Nicaragua
              (3) Brazil
              (4) Philippines
              (5) Thailand
              (6) Germany
              (7) Czech Republic
              (8) Spain

              Comment


              • #8
                I read somewhere in the wikipedia that Israel submitted the application for WBC

                I don't know / I haven't heard how it turned out.


                Wiki was telling that Israel wants to participate with Jewish-American MLB players like Shawn Green.

                Comment


                • #9
                  if they have 26-24 teams I like to see them make the roster bit bigger like 32 players with 5 starting pitchers

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Mischa View Post
                    The 2009 Baseball World Cup will have 22 teams and there are a couple like Panama and Brazil which are as good as some of the 22 which are included.



                    India almost never plays in the Asian Championships even. Thailand or the Philippines if you need a 5th Asian team.

                    Curacao's team separate from the regular Dutch team would be better than Colombia, as they showed in the 2008 Americas Baseball Cup - guys like Ardley Jansen, Randolph Kirindongo, Lorvin Louisa, Johnny Gregorius, etc.
                    Well the Baseball World Cup doesn't involve MLB players and Korea and Japan also don't send their best. I'm just saying I think a 24th team like the Czechs might get simply embarrassed in a tourney featuring better players then what's seen in the World Cups.

                    If 20 teams doesn't work mathematically with pool play or elimination style, then go for 24. I'd rather 24 too just dont think we have that many skilled enough nations yet to be competitive.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Of course, you don't have to start all the teams at the same level.

                      That is, you could have a tiered tournament, a kind of qualifying round, in which the teams that don't make it out of this year's first round start in pools with all the newly-invited countries... this spares the weaker of those teams from humiliation at the hands of powerhouses, and gives the stronger a chance to actually win a game or two, which would probably do more for a nascent program than an unmitigated thrashing and a ticket back home.

                      Advancers from that group then meet the second-round qualifiers from this year.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by cutchemist42 View Post
                        Well the Baseball World Cup doesn't involve MLB players and Korea and Japan also don't send their best. I'm just saying I think a 24th team like the Czechs might get simply embarrassed in a tourney featuring better players then what's seen in the World Cups.

                        If 20 teams doesn't work mathematically with pool play or elimination style, then go for 24. I'd rather 24 too just dont think we have that many skilled enough nations yet to be competitive.
                        The Czech Republic is probably as good as South Africa, which has played in both WBCs.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by spark240 View Post
                          Of course, you don't have to start all the teams at the same level.

                          That is, you could have a tiered tournament, a kind of qualifying round, in which the teams that don't make it out of this year's first round start in pools with all the newly-invited countries... this spares the weaker of those teams from humiliation at the hands of powerhouses, and gives the stronger a chance to actually win a game or two, which would probably do more for a nascent program than an unmitigated thrashing and a ticket back home.

                          Advancers from that group then meet the second-round qualifiers from this year.
                          This is probably the most likely format. Preliminaries preceding a first-round and then the second round, semi-finals and final.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by ShawnC View Post
                            This is probably the most likely format. Preliminaries preceding a first-round and then the second round, semi-finals and final.
                            I absolutely agree. They could do it a few ways. Take the bottom eight teams from the current tournament and put them in four four-team preliminary or qualifying pools for the '13 Classic. Then add eight new teams to those. The top two teams from each pool would advance to the main rounds.

                            Alternatively, they could take the bottom four teams from the '09 WBC (that is, the first to exit each pool) and place them in three four-team pools. The top teams from each pool would advance, as would the top team left under some tie-breaker rule (runs scored, etc.)

                            So here's what it would look like. Assuming the most likely final records for this tournament--and using my proposed teams above--the preliminary round of 16 could be something like this:

                            Pool 1: China, Taiwan, Philippines, Thailand.
                            Pool 2: Panama, Canada, Colombia, Nicaragua
                            Pool 3: Netherlands, Italy, Germany, Czech Rep.
                            Pool 4: Australia, South Africa, Brazil, Spain

                            Alternatively, three pools could look like this (and I'm obviously guessing who the bottom four teams will be this year):

                            Pool 1: China, Philippines, Thailand, South Africa
                            Pool 2: Panama, Colombia, Nicaragua, Brazil
                            Pool 3: Italy, Germany, Czech Rep., Spain

                            Or something like that.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Right now thy are look at 24 counties

                              Here some of the counties I like to see

                              Greece
                              UK
                              Spain
                              Nicaragua
                              Israel
                              Germany
                              NZ

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X