Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

2021 World Baseball Classic

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Improvement ideas for the next WBC

    The 2017 WBC has concluded and many baseball journalists are pitching the idea of holding the WBC semifinals during All-Star week. The idea sounds possible in theory, but pitchers aren’t used for more than a couple of innings in the ASG, much less pitch a couple of competitive games outside of their MLB club’s control. The idea doesn’t even consider that many other professional leagues around the world would have to plan their All-Star Game & festivities to coincide with MLB’s. Just about the only thing that tournament organizers and journalists seem to agree on, is that there is no perfect time to hold the WBC. Outside of the timing of the event, here are some ways to improve the WBC:

    1) Announce hosts years in advance: As flawed as FIFA and the IOC are, one of the few things they and many other sporting event organizers do correctly is that they announce hosts years in advance. All of the 2017 WBC hosts were announced about six months away from the first pitch. This is not good enough for baseball’s marquee international event. Especially, when attendances for games not involving the host nation are dismal. It would help those attendances if people had years to prepare for their trip; instead of a few months. This would also help the next suggestion…

    2) Have a region host the whole event: Having Pools hosted in many different countries limits the possibilities of tournament formats, interrupts the flow of the event and doesn’t maximize the potential for boosting attendance. Given enough time to make travel arrangements, people could visit just about anywhere. Based on the latest attendance, only a few regions have the stadiums to surpass those numbers in the month of March. A singular region could be the focal point of the baseball universe’s attention.

    3) Mix up the groups without using a selection committee: The previous two suggestions would enable Pools to be mixed up a little more. The following team pairings have been made in all WBC editions: Japan/China, USA/Canada and South Korea/Taiwan. The following are the most common parings in the second round of the WBC: Japan/Cuba, Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico/Venezuela. Part of what makes the FIFA World Cup so great are all of the possibilities for match-ups in contrasting styles. This is another thing that FIFA does correctly; it arranges team by quality and geography then randomly selects the groups for their World Cup. The use of a selection committee makes WBC Pools more predictable and therefore a little less interesting.

    4) Limit the use of Passport players: First let’s define what a Passport player is, they are players that are only eligible for a passport of the country they are to represent. The use of Passport players in the WBC makes it hard for some to take the tournament seriously. Some national teams rely more heavily on their use than others. Obviously, MLB has very relaxed player eligibility rules and this hurts national federations that don’t possess a seemingly endless supply of Passport players. MLB wants national teams to be as competitive as possible, but at what expense? The problem is that these players represent “their” country in the WBC, then go back home and never follow up promoting the game in the place they represented. This is not to say that a Passport player cannot evolve into a permanent resident player that promotes the game of baseball within the country he represented in the tournament. MLB needs to give national teams with more home grown talent some leverage, by limiting the use of Passport players; this will help develop and promote the game more than the current system.

    5) Incorporate the Robo Ump to call the strike zone: We got a small sample of what a bad home plate umpire can do in the last WBC tournament. National pride, Umpire Egos and perceived favoritism is a toxic mix, but the good news is that the technology exists to neutralize the potential for an ugly incident. With the next WBC in four years, MLB should be proactive and implement Robo Ump; there is more than enough time to fine tune the technology. Home plate umpires don’t need to be eliminated all-together, but take the strike zone out of their hands.

    6) Expand the amount of participating nations: Baseball is back in the Olympics for Tokyo 2020 and there are no guarantees that it will be on the program beyond that. MLB should seize the momentum of the currently finished WBC tournament and expand the qualifiers as much as possible. The worst eight teams from the last qualifiers aren’t that much better than the potential next eight teams to be invited.

    7) Find more broadcast partners: MLB Network is available in over 70 million U.S. homes, but it cannot cover all of the games simultaneously. A broadcast partnership would lighten the content load and allow access to a larger audience. MLB Network had exclusive WBC rights through 2017, so this could very well change going forward.

    8) Make Statcast go Metric: MLB is trying to globalize baseball, and Statcast is an amazing way to demonstrate and quantify how talented MLB players are. But the rest of the world may not quite appreciate what these numbers mean and they have no time to break out a conversion table. MLB should simplify things by showing all values in both Standard & Metric.

    9) Settle on a tie breaker system: Each edition of the WBC has had a different tie breaker system and none have been repeated. MLB needs to establish one tie breaker system and communicate it clearly to all national federations as well as answer all technical questions before every tournament.

    In the unlikely case MLB is considering moving the whole tournament to July, an outside the box idea is a Hybrid Split season format and consists of the first half of the season focusing primarily on divisional rivalries. Due to the odd number of teams in each league and all divisions; some non-divisional games will have to be played in the first half. Two of every three series each team plays should be against a division rival and all divisional games should be wrapped up by mid-season. At this point, all six divisional champions would be decided strictly by their divisional record and all non-divisional first half games would count towards the wildcard race. The remainder of the season would be used to determine the wildcards by a) total win-loss record or b) non-divisional win-loss record. In order to complete all divisional games by mid-season, the current amount of head to head divisional games would have to be reduced to 12 or 13 games; depending on how long MLB wants their seasons during World Baseball Classic years. To summarize, 6 of the 10 playoff teams would be determined by mid-season, the second half would contain the WBC break and would only decide the wildcard teams.

    We should be expecting for some changes to be made to the next World Baseball Classic, whether or not the changes improve the tournament is another question to be answered in 2021.
    Last edited by SouthwestAmAZins; 03-28-2017, 11:52 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Great post Southwest, here's some of my quick thoughts:

      -Yeah, I hate how late the hosts get announced, I think its a joke.

      -I've said the regional thing before as well. I've actually thought about regions too which could do it. You'd obviously need 4 stadiums to start, but I think any combination of Taiwan/Japan/Korea, Southern California, Florida/PR, etc could work.

      -I agree about the passport players, as a lot of them seem like guys who show up for a few days and never get involved after. I would limit it to maybe 7 guys like that, and after that you need to be a citizen of the country. I think one of the more embarrasing things for the WBC would be for a passport-heavy team to get far.

      -Some matchups are getting old, and I argued that I didnt think the pools were not that balanced.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by SouthwestAmAZins View Post
        My early WBCQ host predictions are Culiacan, New Taipei City, Panama & Vancouver
        I think Colombia should have a new stadium by then.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Richard View Post
          I think Colombia should have a new stadium by then.
          Colombia beat Canada so they don't need to qualify.

          If the WBC expanded to 20 teams any thoughts on the WBC including every continent? Africa has been missing the past 2.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by gianc006 View Post
            If the WBC expanded to 20 teams any thoughts on the WBC including every continent? Africa has been missing the past 2.
            Only if an African team qualifies for the main event; South Africa may qualify if they continue to improve on their 2016 form.

            Comment


            • #36
              Here are IMO, the possible 2020 WBCQ hosts in order of likelihood:
              • Taiwan: An experienced WBC host with many stadiums to choose from and due to its relegation, is very likely to be offered a chance to host.

              • Mexico: An experienced WBC host with many stadiums to choose from and due to its relegation, is very likely to be offered a chance to host. Security issues & the controversial 2017 tie-breaker result will only create the illusion of drama.

              • Panama: An experienced WBCQ host that could likely host if Canada or China pass on the opportunity.

              • Nicaragua: The new Denis Martinez Stadium should be completed this year and is MLB standards compliant; it is very likely that a hosting bid will submitted for this venue and they may just get it.

              • United States: The WBC Steering Committee has used U.S. hosts in the previous WBCQs with Jupiter & Brooklyn, so there is still a possibility that it will happen again.

              • Canada: Has several venues that could potentially host a WBCQ round, but they have passed on a previous opportunity to host. Perhaps, it’s that September is the only month of the year they can host or Toronto’s Stadium is too large to host a WBCQ.

              • China: Has never hosted a WBC event, but has the potential for their government to green light the construction of an adequate facility relatively quickly. Although, it is unlikely that will happen and also unlikely that they will host.

              • Germany: An experienced WBCQ host, but also passed on a previous opportunity. Due to their fourth place finish in 2016, the WBC Steering Committee may offer them the opportunity to host a Pre qualifier, but it is very unlikely that they will host a 2020 WBCQ.

              • Brazil, Spain, France, Great Britain, Czech Republic, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan & the Philippines: Some have hosted non-WBC events, but their venues are probably not considered MLB compliant, making it highly unlikely any of these countries would host in 2020.
              Last edited by SouthwestAmAZins; 04-07-2017, 09:27 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Madison Bumgarner didn't want to play in the WBC because he didn't want to risk injury and now he might be out for two months due a stupid dirt bike accident. Shame on him.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by SouthwestAmAZins View Post
                  Here are IMO, the possible 2020 WBCQ hosts in order of likelihood:
                  • Taiwan: An experienced WBC host with many stadiums to choose from and due to its relegation, is very likely to be offered a chance to host.

                  • Mexico: An experienced WBC host with many stadiums to choose from and due to its relegation, is very likely to be offered a chance to host. Security issues & the controversial 2017 tie-breaker result will only create the illusion of drama.

                  • Panama: An experienced WBCQ host that could likely host if Canada or China pass on the opportunity.

                  • Nicaragua: The new Denis Martinez Stadium should be completed this year and is MLB standards compliant; it is very likely that a hosting bid will submitted for this venue and they may just get it.

                  • United States: The WBC Steering Committee has used U.S. hosts in the previous WBCQs with Jupiter & Brooklyn, so there is still a possibility that it will happen again.

                  • Canada: Has several venues that could potentially host a WBCQ round, but they have passed on a previous opportunity to host. Perhaps, it’s that September is the only month of the year they can host or Toronto’s Stadium is too large to host a WBCQ.

                  • China: Has never hosted a WBC event, but has the potential for their government to green light the construction of an adequate facility relatively quickly. Although, it is unlikely that will happen and also unlikely that they will host.

                  • Germany: An experienced WBCQ host, but also passed on a previous opportunity. Due to their fourth place finish in 2016, the WBC Steering Committee may offer them the opportunity to host a Pre qualifier, but it is very unlikely that they will host a 2020 WBCQ.

                  • Brazil, Spain, France, Great Britain, Czech Republic, South Africa, New Zealand, Pakistan & the Philippines: Some have hosted non-WBC events, but their venues are probably not considered MLB compliant, making it highly unlikely any of these countries would host in 2020.
                  Based on this list, the 2020 WBCQ may look like:

                  New Taipei City Culiacan Panama Managua
                  2017 WBC Relegated Teams Taiwan Mexico China Canada
                  2016 WBCQ 2nd Place South Africa Great Britain Panama Nicaragua
                  2016 WBCQ 3rd Place New Zealand Brazil France Czech Republic
                  2016 WBCQ 4th Place Pakistan Philippines Germany Spain
                  However, I would like to see Canada host a group with Great Britain, South Africa & New Zealand.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X