I'm in a debate with a poster in another board. We're discussing bullpen roles and how bullpens should be formed.
He says that it's impossible to build a bullpen of 6-7 dominant pitchers so you have to go out and get pitchers that fit certain roles.
I say as a GM you get the best pitchers you can to make a bullpen so that your manager has flexibility and can call upon any pitcher in any situation.
If a player is confined to one role then as a manager you wouldn't be able to use him in another role. The manager would be limited. However if the pitcher is good then he will pitch good regardless of the situation.
Is there any research that proves pitchers strive in certain roles or situations?
I mean I've heard of research that proves that batting orders don't matter for the most part. However is there anything similar for pitchers, where they might do better in setup roles, or as specialists, or closers?
He says that it's impossible to build a bullpen of 6-7 dominant pitchers so you have to go out and get pitchers that fit certain roles.
I say as a GM you get the best pitchers you can to make a bullpen so that your manager has flexibility and can call upon any pitcher in any situation.
If a player is confined to one role then as a manager you wouldn't be able to use him in another role. The manager would be limited. However if the pitcher is good then he will pitch good regardless of the situation.
Is there any research that proves pitchers strive in certain roles or situations?
I mean I've heard of research that proves that batting orders don't matter for the most part. However is there anything similar for pitchers, where they might do better in setup roles, or as specialists, or closers?
Comment