Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Score book

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Score book

    Curious how you would score this? Runner on first with no outs. Batter hits a grounder to short who goes to second but the runner beats the throw so he's safe. Batter is safe at first. Is this considered a fielder's choice for the batter? How would you score this?

  • #2
    It's either a fielder's choice or an error, depending on how the runner got to be safe.
    46 wins to match last year's total

    Comment


    • #3
      If there is no misplay, it is either a fielder's choice or a hit. If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice. Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first. Sounds like a hit.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Macker View Post
        If there is no misplay, it is either a fielder's choice or a hit. If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice. Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first. Sounds like a hit.
        Yeah that's true, too. Good catch.
        46 wins to match last year's total

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Macker View Post
          If there is no misplay, it is either a fielder's choice or a hit. If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice.
          Exactamundo.

          Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first. Sounds like a hit.
          This is a very bad assumption. It’s not at all uncommon that a runner on 1st is moving on an attempted steal, run and hit, or a hit and run and the fielders misjudge their being able to get a force and the fielders misjudge their being able to get a force and they try for the force. In that case it’s just a bad choice by the fielder.
          Last edited by scorekeeper; 04-09-2018, 02:22 PM.
          The pitcher who’s afraid to throw strikes, will soon be standing in the shower with the hitter who's afraid to swing.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Macker View Post
            If there is no misplay, it is either a fielder's choice or a hit. If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice. Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first. Sounds like a hit.
            this........
            This week's Giant

            #5 in games played as a Giant with 1721 , Bill Terry

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JR Hart View Post

              this........
              Evidently you don't see many games where the runners move until contact. Out coach puts on the hit and run, run and hit, suicide squeeze, and attempts lots of steals as well. Those things produce lots of instances where a fielder may very well try for a force but not get it.
              The pitcher who’s afraid to throw strikes, will soon be standing in the shower with the hitter who's afraid to swing.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by scorekeeper View Post

                Evidently you don't see many games where the runners move until contact. Out coach puts on the hit and run, run and hit, suicide squeeze, and attempts lots of steals as well. Those things produce lots of instances where a fielder may very well try for a force but not get it.
                Evidently, you don't realize that we already know that. Whether the runner is going on the pitch is irrelevant. The only thing that matters on whether it is a fielder's choice or a hit is this: "If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Macker View Post
                  Evidently, you don't realize that we already know that. Whether the runner is going on the pitch is irrelevant. The only thing that matters on whether it is a fielder's choice or a hit is this: "If the scorer believes the batter could have been retired had the throw gone to first, then it is a fielder's choice."
                  Of course you know that, but that’s not what I was questioning. You said, “Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first.“

                  All I did was point out that there are a lot of reasons an R1 will beat a throw to 2nd but retiring the batter-runner would be ordinary.
                  The pitcher who’s afraid to throw strikes, will soon be standing in the shower with the hitter who's afraid to swing.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by scorekeeper View Post

                    Of course you know that, but that’s not what I was questioning. You said, “Since the runner beat the shortstop's throw to second, though, it seems doubtful the shortstop could have retired the batter at first.“

                    All I did was point out that there are a lot of reasons an R1 will beat a throw to 2nd but retiring the batter-runner would be ordinary.
                    No kidding. I supposed I could have typed 2,000 words describing every possible scenarios. Instead of being a pedant, how about just sticking to the main issue?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Macker View Post

                      No kidding. I supposed I could have typed 2,000 words describing every possible scenarios. Instead of being a pedant, how about just sticking to the main issue?
                      I fail to see how calling me a piece of jewelry add anything to the conversation, but sure, the main issue is, a lot of people THINK they know how to score a baseball game, but very few do. I've scored well over 100 games a year for well over 20 years and there's seldom a week that goes by where I don't check the scoring rules to be sure about something to be sure. 99.9% of the scorers I've run into have either never looked at the scoring rules or looked at them once years ago and ASSUME they have everything in the rule book memorized without fail. Obviously you and everyone else who might use this forum fall into the 0.1% category and need no help, which makes me question why the OP was made in the 1st place. Sorry I was so presumptive as to question someone so perfect.
                      The pitcher who’s afraid to throw strikes, will soon be standing in the shower with the hitter who's afraid to swing.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Pendant: a piece of jewelry that hangs from a chain worn around the neck.
                        Pedant: a person who is excessively concerned with minor details and rules or with displaying academic learning.

                        Please read more carefully. Concentrate on what matters.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          A fielder's choice does not have to produce an out. If it is a routine grounder, the shortstop made a mental error but not a statistical error. It is a fielder's choice and no out. It is a judgment call, but if the grounder was fielded inside the normal ground out arc, it is almost always an FC.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Another thread that has devolved into Exhibit A for "why ids this place so dead" and other such threads.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X