Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.


Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever |
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Extra Innings Game Creates a Reverse Sacrifice Situation.

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Extra Innings Game Creates a Reverse Sacrifice Situation.

    July 20, 2018 game Texas Rangers versus Cleveland Indians. The Rangers beat up Cleveland pitching in the 7th and 9th innings. Score went from 7-4 in favor of Cleveland to 7-6 in the seventh, Indians added one run in eighth to make it 8-6, Texas got back to back home runs in the 9th inning with two outs against the Indians closer to make it a tie game 8-8.

    Bottom of the 10th and the Rangers get the first two runners on base on solidly hit singles. Runners on first and second, no outs, is it time for a sacrifice to put the winning run on third base and the second runner on second base and avoid a double play, or, just hit away and even if there is a double play there will still be a runner on third with two outs?

    Most here will probably say don't go for the sacrifice, but what about a reverse sacrifice? A reverse sacrifice is what probably should have happened next, but did not. The third batter hit a shot to the right fielder who was playing deep. The ball arrived so quickly on one bounce and was also thrown back quickly and strongly enough to cause the third base coach to stop the runner at third so the bases were now loaded with no outs. But wait a comes that never ending nuanced baseball strategy....

    What if the third base coach had sent the runner home? The best case scenario is the throw is off line, or the catcher fumbles the ball, or the runner beats or avoids the tag and is safe at home and the game is over. The worst case scenario is the runner is out at home with the two other runners advancing to second and third on the throw home. This is what I call a reverse sacrifice situation. It's one thing to do a sacrifice to move two runners over into scoring position, it's quite another to just go for it and send the runner home KNOWING that the worst case scenario will be an out at home plate and the other two runners perched on second and third with one out, aka a reverse sacrifice effect.

    Since the worst case scenario is equivalent to a successful sacrifice, why not take a chance and send the runner home since the play at home was going to be close and it could have meant an instant victory?
    Last edited by Alessandro Machi; 08-01-2018, 09:39 PM.

  • #2
    Another reverse sacrifice situation came up today, this time in the ninth inning. Cleveland vs Minnesota, tie score, bottom of the ninth inning. Runner on first for the Indians, no outs. Ball is a hit a ton to the centerfield wall, runner on first scampers past second base, then has to reverse course to get back to first base after the ball is caught. Now, the batter is irrelevant in terms of his run counting because the score is tied and there is a runner ahead of him and it is the bottom of the ninth inning. The situation called for the runner at first to tag up and at the very least get to second base if the ball is caught. If the ball is not caught, he may only advance one base, maybe two. Maybe, just maybe, if the ball is not caught and he is running on contact, he scores and the game is over.

    However, the reason the runner on first goes at least half way to second base on practically every deeply hit ball is to give the batter room to round first base without passing the lead runner. If the ball is not caught, the team then has at the very least runners on second and third. If the runner tags at first base and the ball is not caught, then basically the team lost the equivalent of 2 bases as runners are on first and second instead of second and third.

    BUT, because the game is tied and this is the bottom of the ninth inning, the most important thing, in my opinion, is to get the lead runner to second base as a worst case scenario. Since the fly ball was caught, and the runner from first had taken off on contact, the lead runner had to go back to first base.

    This is another example of a reverse sacrifice. The lead runner in a walk off situation should put themselves in the best case scenario to advance at least one base since it was not a given batted ball would be a hit. If the ball had been an obvious hit off the bat to the wall and the runner at first wanted to try and score, I would be okay with that because there will be a trailing runner at least at second, maybe even at third on the throw home. If the runner is out at home, the batter is now at either second or third base with only one out. In essence, this would be either equal to or better than if a sacrifice had been performed to get the lead runner from first to second.

    So the conclusion is, in a walk off situation with no outs and a runner on first base, it is imperative to get the baserunner to second base by tagging from first base on a deeply hit ball because even the worst case scenario of a fly out is no worse than if the batter had intentioanally sacrificed the runner over to second base. What makes baseball so fascinating is that rules that apply to the first 8 and 1/2 innings suddenly don't work as well in a walk off scenario. This is the second time a tried and true practice was the wrong strategy to take.

    Remember the reverse sacrifice rule, if the worst case scenario in a walk off win situation is the equivalent to a sacrifice, then take the action that can't be worse than a sacrifice. In this situation running on impact and then having to scuttle back to first base produced a scenario that was worse than a sacrifice, and therefore not the correct course of action to take in a walk off win scenario.
    Last edited by Alessandro Machi; 08-09-2018, 11:56 PM.


    • #3
      Originally posted by Alessandro Machi View Post

      Since the worst case scenario is equivalent to a successful sacrifice, why not take a chance and send the runner home since the play at home was going to be close and it could have meant an instant victory?
      Because you already have runners on second and third (and first) with 3 outs to get one of them home with. Why give up an almost sure out?

      If you give up that out they likely walk the next batter and have achance to get out of it on one groundball.


      19th Century League Champion
      1900s League Champion
      1910s League Champion

      1930s League Division Winner
      1950s League Champion
      1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
      1960s League Division Winner
      1970s League Champion
      1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
      1980s League Champion
      All Time Greats League Champion


      • #4
        Originally posted by SavoyBG View Post

        Because you already have runners on second and third (and first) with 3 outs to get one of them home with. Why give up an almost sure out?

        If you give up that out they likely walk the next batter and have achance to get out of it on one groundball.
        The key here is, how sure of an out is it going to be from a long throw in from the outfield. Granted the ball was hit hard and right at the outfielder. but the outfielder was playing relatively deep. The outfielder has a strong arm, but, that ball has to either reach the cutoff man, or be thrown accurately all the way to home either on a perfect bounce or on the fly to ensure a very strong probability of an out at home.

        f one is ok with a sacrifice in that situation, then one is ok with risking it to get the game over. As it turned out in this instance, the bases were loaded, and even though all three hits were solidly hit, the pitcher (who has since been released by Cleveland), managed to get the next three outs without allowing the winning run to score. Cleveland scored in the top of the 11th inning and ended up winning the game. Twins announcers seemed a bit unsure as to why the Twins did not try to win it on that third hit by sending the runner home.
        Last edited by Alessandro Machi; 08-10-2018, 12:47 PM.


        Ad Widget