Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Aaron Nola's B-Ref WAR seems impossibly high...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aaron Nola's B-Ref WAR seems impossibly high...

    I mean, he had a great season, but 10.5 WAR great??? Kershaw's career high is 8.0! Roy Halladay used to pitch 250+ innings and he never reached 9 WAR.

    Nola pitched a mere 212 innings this year.

    Roger Clemens in 1990 had the same 10.5 WAR, but he had a 211 ERA+ that year compared to Nola's 175 and he pitched 16 more innings than Nola to boot. Greg Maddux's insane 1994 and 1995 seasons with ERA+ of 271 and 260 didn't get him to 10 WAR In either season (granted, he had only 202 IP in '94 and 209 IP in '95 due to the strike, but still Nola beats him handily on a per inning basis).

    I assume the ballpark and the defense behind Nola played a big role in getting to the 10.5 number. but are we to believe that he was 2.5 wins more valuable this year than Kershaw's top season and nearly a win better than Maddux's?

    Seems impossible.
    My top 10 players:

    1. Babe Ruth
    2. Barry Bonds
    3. Ty Cobb
    4. Ted Williams
    5. Willie Mays
    6. Alex Rodriguez
    7. Hank Aaron
    8. Honus Wagner
    9. Lou Gehrig
    10. Mickey Mantle

  • #2
    Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post
    I mean, he had a great season, but 10.5 WAR great??? Kershaw's career high is 8.0! Roy Halladay used to pitch 250+ innings and he never reached 9 WAR.

    Nola pitched a mere 212 innings this year.

    Roger Clemens in 1990 had the same 10.5 WAR, but he had a 211 ERA+ that year compared to Nola's 175 and he pitched 16 more innings than Nola to boot. Greg Maddux's insane 1994 and 1995 seasons with ERA+ of 271 and 260 didn't get him to 10 WAR In either season (granted, he had only 202 IP in '94 and 209 IP in '95 due to the strike, but still Nola beats him handily on a per inning basis).

    I assume the ballpark and the defense behind Nola played a big role in getting to the 10.5 number. but are we to believe that he was 2.5 wins more valuable this year than Kershaw's top season and nearly a win better than Maddux's?

    Seems impossible.
    BBref is saying that the Phillies defense was so bad that it gave him an extra 16 runs (or about 1.5 WAR) That is of course silly since there is no way they played horribly behind him while he got a BABIP below .250 or whatever it was. The worst thing about how BBref deals with pitchers and defensive support is that it assumes that the defense interacted with every pitcher the same. usually it is not a big deal - but there outliers. I am sure Nola was good suppressing BABIP - but there is no way he took a terrible defense and put up a .250 BABIP based on sill alone.

    ALSO - WAR does not use ERA - it uses RA. Nola had ONE UER this season. Kershaw usually has between 5-10 per season. Their RA+ would be MUCH closer than their ERA+.

    But a 175 ERA+ at 212 IP (with only one UER) and 9 WAR (without the defensive adjustement) seems about right. He played in a hitters park and the current runs to wins conversion factor is favorable for pitchers.

    Doc and Kershaw have NEVER been given +15 runs back and usually (with good defense behind them) lose runs each year. Kershaw also pitches in a pitcher's park. And they rarely if ever had no UER. Nola's FIP based WAR is 5.6, FWIW. We can certainly be skeptical of how BBRef deal with team defense - but BBref isn't making up numbers or anything.

    By the way...Kershaw has had exactly one season in his career with 200+ IP and a 175 ERA+. He had a few others really close. But it ain't like Kershaw is blowing 215 and 175 out of the water every year. He averages 191 IP and a 159 ERA+ per season...in a pitcher's park with great defenses behind him.

    But the idea of Kershaw going out and throwing 250 IP with 200 ERA+ is a myth. He has never been that guy.

    So bottom line - you have large team defense adjustments...one single UER...major hitter's park...and favorable runs to wins conversion (lower run environment)...
    Last edited by Bothrops Atrox; 10-12-2018, 05:38 PM.
    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Bothrops Atrox View Post

      ALSO - WAR does not use ERA - it uses RA.
      Do they count unearned runs the same as earned runs?

      This explains a lot about how guys with a worse ERA+ can have more WAR than a guy with a better ERA+.

      .


      19th Century League Champion
      1900s League Champion
      1910s League Champion

      1930s League Division Winner
      1950s League Champion
      1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
      1960s League Division Winner
      1970s League Champion
      1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
      1980s League Champion
      All Time Greats League Champion

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by SavoyBG View Post

        Do they count unearned runs the same as earned runs?

        This explains a lot about how guys with a worse ERA+ can have more WAR than a guy with a better ERA+.
        It is counted the same. It is one reason for the discrepancy - but the team defense adjustments are typically the largest factor. Using R instead of ER is a smaller, yet still important factor.

        It is controversial - but studies show that there is actually a lot of y2y correlation in which pitchers allow the most UER and which allow the fewest. Even controling for team switches, etc. It is definitely more of a skill than not and is tied heavily to contact rates, velocity of batted balls, type of batted ball trajectory, and other factors. In a perfect world, the powers that be would weigh UER a little less since the defense behind the pitcher obviously contributes some - but if the options are 1. ignoring UER completely or including them completely...they picked the right one.

        And people REALLY forget about runs to win conversion. Just estimating here - but a pitcher who saved 50 runs above average in 1992 would have about 5.9 WAR and 4.9 WAR just 5 years later.

        There is SOOOO much more to contextualizing pitching than just looking at IP and ERA.
        Last edited by Bothrops Atrox; 10-12-2018, 07:30 PM.
        1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

        1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

        1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


        The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
        The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

        Comment


        • #5
          He is the Mike Trout of pitchers.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by willshad View Post
            He is the Mike Trout of pitchers.
            Not really. When his BABIP, HR/FB, and LOB% rates stabilize next year - he will be "just" a very good pitcher next year.

            Trout will likely finish top 3 in wRC+/OPS+ (as always) while playing above average defense (in CF none-the-less) while being one of the handful of best baserunners in the league like he does every year.
            1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

            1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

            1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


            The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
            The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bothrops Atrox View Post

              but if the options are 1. ignoring UER completely or including them completely...they picked the right one.
              But those were not the only options. There are some metrics that include just a percentage of unearned runs. I think Win Shares for one.
              .


              19th Century League Champion
              1900s League Champion
              1910s League Champion

              1930s League Division Winner
              1950s League Champion
              1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
              1960s League Division Winner
              1970s League Champion
              1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
              1980s League Champion
              All Time Greats League Champion

              Comment


              • #8
                Babip is not just defense but also luck.


                b ref gives nola full credit for the 250 babip AND gives him extra bonus for playing behind a bad defense (which it of course was with several guys playing out of position). Ignoring babip and defense is probably wrong but fully ignoring babip luck and calling it all defense is probably wrong too.

                sure defensive independent pitch stats were created to account for defense but babip is also part random and not just defensive quality although that does play a big role.

                this problem will even stick when using "objective stats" like xWOBA because even if the batted balls suggest he earned a 250 babip it doesn't mean it is repeatable
                I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by SavoyBG View Post

                  But those were not the only options. There are some metrics that include just a percentage of unearned runs. I think Win Shares for one.
                  Right. That is why I said "if."
                  1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                  1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                  1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                  The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                  The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dominik View Post
                    Babip is not just defense but also luck.


                    b ref gives nola full credit for the 250 babip AND gives him extra bonus for playing behind a bad defense (which it of course was with several guys playing out of position). Ignoring babip and defense is probably wrong but fully ignoring babip luck and calling it all defense is probably wrong too.

                    sure defensive independent pitch stats were created to account for defense but babip is also part random and not just defensive quality although that does play a big role.

                    this problem will even stick when using "objective stats" like xWOBA because even if the batted balls suggest he earned a 250 babip it doesn't mean it is repeatable
                    This issue is that in order for real team run prevention to = WAR - that "luck" run prevention has to go into somebodies bucket. The same way BABIP luck for hitters goes into the batter's bucket. Fielding luck still goes into the fielder's bucket. No WAR actually tries to identify and remove luck. Nor can it without WAR runs and wins not equaling real runs/wins. FG is concerned with pitcher luck (and pitcher luck only) and just decides to throw the babies out with the bathwater.

                    Nola absolutely had a combination of BABIP skill/defense/luck going his way. But BBref WAR isn't worried about skill or repeatability.

                    The BABIP and sequencing components of pitching will always be estimates in WAR. BBPRo tried to micromanage the issue and came up with something even more bizarre a silly than what FG and BBRef has. Perfect is the enemy of good.
                    Last edited by Bothrops Atrox; 10-13-2018, 07:17 AM.
                    1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                    1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                    1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                    The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                    The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by willshad View Post
                      He is the Mike Trout of pitchers.
                      Nola has been the best pitcher in baseball for seven years running? That's news to me.
                      My top 10 players:

                      1. Babe Ruth
                      2. Barry Bonds
                      3. Ty Cobb
                      4. Ted Williams
                      5. Willie Mays
                      6. Alex Rodriguez
                      7. Hank Aaron
                      8. Honus Wagner
                      9. Lou Gehrig
                      10. Mickey Mantle

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by GiambiJuice View Post

                        Nola has been the best pitcher in baseball for seven years running? That's news to me.
                        Maybe this is just the first of seven!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          People much smarter than me making the case much more articulately:

                          http://tangotiger.com/index.php/site...ing-adjustment
                          1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                          1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                          1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                          The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                          The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I seem to recall somewhere else, maybe the NL Cy thread, it was put out there that Nola was getting better fielders behind him than the other Philly starters.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Bothrops Atrox View Post
                              People much smarter than me making the case much more articulately:

                              http://tangotiger.com/index.php/site...ing-adjustment
                              In 1972 the story going around was that the Phillies played much better in the field and on offense when Carlton was pitching than they did the rest of the time. Maybe that was true some since at that time the team was so bad that they knew they weren't going anywhere and could have just gone through the motions in the n on Carlton games. But you can't say that for the Nola situation since the team was at or near the top of the division for most of the year.
                              .


                              19th Century League Champion
                              1900s League Champion
                              1910s League Champion

                              1930s League Division Winner
                              1950s League Champion
                              1960 Strat-O-Matic League Regular Season Winner
                              1960s League Division Winner
                              1970s League Champion
                              1971 Strat-O-Matic League Runner Up
                              1980s League Champion
                              All Time Greats League Champion

                              Comment

                              Ad Widget

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X