For those of you who are not aware, Bill James has been working on a revision of Win Shares. For the most part the big difference is in the introduction of Loss Shares. He has been slowly leaking tidbits at his new website Bill James Online.
Today he provided a short article in response to a question that was recently asked about the decision to allocate 52% of credit to pithcing and defense and 48% to hitting and baserunning. The article states that this decision was ultimately driven by the way that he had accounted for a pitcher's hitting. Basically he had taken positive runs created by a pitcher's hitting and credited those runs to the pitcher's run prevention.
He now admits that this was a mistake that he is fixing in the next version. Here's a short blurb...
Well, that makes me feel a little better. The whole 52/48 thing really bothered me, as I thought the original explanation was somewhat lame. Along with the introduction of Loss Shares, I think we're seeing a little progress here. We'll have to wait and see what else is going to be fixed.
Today he provided a short article in response to a question that was recently asked about the decision to allocate 52% of credit to pithcing and defense and 48% to hitting and baserunning. The article states that this decision was ultimately driven by the way that he had accounted for a pitcher's hitting. Basically he had taken positive runs created by a pitcher's hitting and credited those runs to the pitcher's run prevention.
He now admits that this was a mistake that he is fixing in the next version. Here's a short blurb...
Early on in the design of Win Shares and Loss Shares I realized that, using 52% for pitching and defense, I had too many Win Shares going to pitching and defense, and I needed to move it back to 50%. So then I asked myself, “Well, what am I doing different here than I was before, that caused this problem to go away?”
Just a silly design mistake on my part.
Just a silly design mistake on my part.
Comment