I was looking at some old baseball posters and noticed this poster from 1952 with Ralph Kiner, referring to his .627 slugging percentage in 1951. I had thought slugging percentage was like WHIP, FIP and other recent stats: a relatively recent statistic and didn't expect it to be available in the 1950's. So how old is slugging percentage and who created it?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Origin of slugging percentage
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Blue387 View PostI was looking at some old baseball posters and noticed this poster from 1952 with Ralph Kiner, referring to his .627 slugging percentage in 1951. I had thought slugging percentage was like WHIP, FIP and other recent stats: a relatively recent statistic and didn't expect it to be available in the 1950's. So how old is slugging percentage and who created it?
-
Originally posted by Blue387 View PostI was looking at some old baseball posters and noticed this poster from 1952 with Ralph Kiner, referring to his .627 slugging percentage in 1951. I had thought slugging percentage was like WHIP, FIP and other recent stats: a relatively recent statistic and didn't expect it to be available in the 1950's. So how old is slugging percentage and who created it?
he even mentioned OPS:
"I was second only to Ruth in slugging and percentage combined"I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.
Comment
-
-
We were well aware of Slugging Percentage when I was in elementary school, which puts it in the 1940s. I remember first learning how to calculate it and my initial reaction being two-fold: it was simple enough to grasp; and it was cool to weigh in the power factor by weighting the bases per hit.
Seeing the opening post, I've tried to recall the source. I have to guess it was "Who's Who in Baseball," which was sold outside Yankee Stadium [and I'm sure news stands as well]. I believe I got my first issue in 1942, if that's any help.
I recall my childhood idol looked even better with the Slugging Pct. - it being over .600.
P.S. Maybe I should have read ipitch's post about 1923. Honestly, before the 1940s I never heard anyone discuss Slugging, either in conversation or on the sports media [radio and the newspapers].Last edited by leewileyfan; 03-31-2012, 08:56 PM.
Comment
-
It used to be called total base average, and it is calculated the same way as slugging percentage. From the Boston Daily Globe, September 21, 1884: "The batting average of the two teams on single hits was almost exactly the same, but the right field fence helped Chicago to run up a tremendous total base average." The article provides the total base averages for each team in the series. I had trouble reading Boston's, but Chicago's total base average of .426 calculated correctly."Any pitcher who throws at a batter and deliberately tries to hit him is a communist."
- Alvin Dark
Comment
-
Originally posted by AstrosFan View PostIt used to be called total base average, and it is calculated the same way as slugging percentage. From the Boston Daily Globe, September 21, 1884: "The batting average of the two teams on single hits was almost exactly the same, but the right field fence helped Chicago to run up a tremendous total base average." The article provides the total base averages for each team in the series. I had trouble reading Boston's, but Chicago's total base average of .426 calculated correctly.
Toledo News-Bee, October 3, 1912 pg 12
Toledo News -Bee 10-03-1912 pg 12.jpgStrikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
-
I posed this in the Babe Ruth slugging percentage thread. It's from the Elyria Evening Telegram, Sept. 4, 1914. These stats appear to be for a local baseball league. So far it's the earliest use of the phrase "slugging percentage" I could find.
Elyria Evening Telegram 09-04-1914 pg 5a.jpg
Elyria Evening Telegram 09-04-1914 pg 5b.jpgLast edited by Honus Wagner Rules; 09-05-2013, 01:17 PM.Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
-
From the New York Times, February 4, 1908. I'm not sure this is referring to the modern definition of slugging percentage. It's refers to Ty Cobb keeping his slugging percentage under .800?
NYT 02-04-1908.jpgStrikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
-
Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View PostFrom the New York Times, February 4, 1908. I'm not sure this is referring to the modern definition of slugging percentage. It's refers to Ty Cobb keeping his slugging percentage under .800?
[ATTACH]128462[/ATTACH]
Comment
-
Originally posted by ipitch View PostI think it says .300. I've seen a few old articles where "slugging percentage" was used as a nickname for "batting percentage/average."
NYT Cobb.jpgStrikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment