Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

The number 2 hitter in the lineup- how is success measured?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The number 2 hitter in the lineup- how is success measured?

    I thought about this while reading the Nellie Fox thread. It seems to me that the #2 hitter in the lineup is in a unique position- his success or failure shows up more in the stats of the person ahead, or behind them, in the lineup than in their own. Their job is to make contact, push the runner along (or get on if the leadoff hitter fails) and have productive outs. So considering his main job is moving runners along, and he's generally not going to get a lot of runs or RBI, and his OBP should be good, but won't tell the whole story, where other than sacrifice hits, and maybe K/BB ratio, does his success or failure show up? It might be a percentage where BA is actually relevant, but with the "productive outs" thing included, even that doesn't really cut it.

    Does Maury Wills owe part of his success to Junior Gilliam? Brock to Sizemore? Aparicio to Fox?

    Thoughts?
    Found in a fortune cookie On Thursday, August 18th, 2005: "Hard words break no bones, Kind words butter no parsnips."

    1955 1959 1963 1965 1981 1988 2017?

  • #2
    Originally posted by toomanyhatz View Post
    So considering his main job is moving runners along, and he's generally not going to get a lot of runs or RBI, and his OBP should be good, but won't tell the whole story, where other than sacrifice hits, and maybe K/BB ratio, does his success or failure show up?
    I don't know about that bold part. Over the last two seasons (combined), the #2 slot was 2nd in runs.

    Comment


    • #3
      The Sox had Podsednik and Iguchi in 05 and they really clicked but haven't really had a good 2 hitter since. I think a #2 hitter who isn't selfish is pretty hard to find.
      "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

      "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

      Comment


      • #4
        He's broken down now, but Placido Polanco was an ideal #2 IMO in his prime.
        "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by toomanyhatz View Post
          I thought about this while reading the Nellie Fox thread. It seems to me that the #2 hitter in the lineup is in a unique position- his success or failure shows up more in the stats of the person ahead, or behind them, in the lineup than in their own. Their job is to make contact, push the runner along (or get on if the leadoff hitter fails) and have productive outs. So considering his main job is moving runners along, and he's generally not going to get a lot of runs or RBI, and his OBP should be good, but won't tell the whole story, where other than sacrifice hits, and maybe K/BB ratio, does his success or failure show up? It might be a percentage where BA is actually relevant, but with the "productive outs" thing included, even that doesn't really cut it.

          Does Maury Wills owe part of his success to Junior Gilliam? Brock to Sizemore? Aparicio to Fox?

          Thoughts?
          that is the classic interpretation of the 2 hitter but there has been mathematical analysis that suggests it would make sense to put your best hitter in the 2 hole. while that is certainly theoretical but certainly the "get em over" approach in the 2 hole is a very bad one.

          the 2 hitter will get the second most PAs per season of all your hitters and have a lot of RBI and scoring chances. anything but putting a competent, high OBP hitter in the 2 hole is very stupid although there are still some managers who are doing that (especially in the NL)
          I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by toomanyhatz View Post
            I thought about this while reading the Nellie Fox thread. It seems to me that the #2 hitter in the lineup is in a unique position- his success or failure shows up more in the stats of the person ahead, or behind them, in the lineup than in their own. Their job is to make contact, push the runner along (or get on if the leadoff hitter fails) and have productive outs. So considering his main job is moving runners along, and he's generally not going to get a lot of runs or RBI, and his OBP should be good, but won't tell the whole story, where other than sacrifice hits, and maybe K/BB ratio, does his success or failure show up? It might be a percentage where BA is actually relevant, but with the "productive outs" thing included, even that doesn't really cut it.

            Does Maury Wills owe part of his success to Junior Gilliam? Brock to Sizemore? Aparicio to Fox?

            Thoughts?
            As with any hitter in any part of the line-up, if you are looking to measure their 'situational' contributions the best stat available is RE24-- or runs above average based on the 24 base/out states.

            If a batter moves the runner on first to third during a productive out, RE24 gives that batter the credit for for the change in run expectancy from 0 outs/runner on 1st to 1 out/runner on 3rd.
            UI2
            BTB

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by dominik View Post
              that is the classic interpretation of the 2 hitter but there has been mathematical analysis that suggests it would make sense to put your best hitter in the 2 hole. while that is certainly theoretical but certainly the "get em over" approach in the 2 hole is a very bad one.

              the 2 hitter will get the second most PAs per season of all your hitters and have a lot of RBI and scoring chances. anything but putting a competent, high OBP hitter in the 2 hole is very stupid although there are still some managers who are doing that (especially in the NL)
              For a real life example, how about Mike Trout? Are the Angels going to continue to bat him leadoff? Sure, his speed and OBP makes him excellent at that position, but can they afford not to move someone with good power further down in the lineup, where he can drive in more runs? Historically, whenever you have a player with great speed and power, power takes precedence, and he bats 3d or lower--Mantle, Mays, Bonds, the younger A-Rod, etc. (One exception to this I can recall is when Giambi was with the A's, I believe they had him batting leadoff for a while. And he wasn't even particularly fast! Just because of a very good OBP).

              But now that they have acquired Hamilton, it seems that the Angels are set at the 3 and 4 positions, unless they want to move Trout to 3d, Pujols to cleanup and Hamilton to 5th. So I could see Trout batting 2d in that lineup next year.
              Last edited by Stolensingle; 12-19-2012, 10:14 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ben Grimm View Post
                He's broken down now, but Placido Polanco was an ideal #2 IMO in his prime.
                "The Book" says that your 1st and 2nd best hitters should hit 2nd and 4th, with the more disciplined hitter 2nd.

                BUT Polanco was the ultimate guy in terms of the 'old school' idea. Jim Leyland loved him. He never struck out, always put the ball in play. He would hit .360 with 2 strikes. Although he didn't draw any walks, he had a way of making the most out of his at bats. Solid defender too. Detroit really struggled at 2nd base when he left.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Stolensingle View Post
                  For a real life example, how about Mike Trout? Are the Angels going to continue to bat him leadoff? Sure, his speed and OBP makes him excellent at that position, but can they afford not to move someone with good power further down in the lineup, where he can drive in more runs? Historically, whenever you have a player with great speed and power, power takes precedence, and he bats 3d or lower--Mantle, Mays, Bonds, the younger A-Rod, etc. (One exception to this I can recall is when Giambi was with the A's, I believe they had him batting leadoff for a while. And he wasn't even particularly fast! Just because of a very good OBP).

                  But now that they have acquired Hamilton, it seems that the Angels are set at the 3 and 4 positions, unless they want to move Trout to 3d, Pujols to cleanup and Hamilton to 5th. So I could see Trout batting 2d in that lineup next year.
                  I think that would be very intelligent. moving either to the 5 spot would IMO a waste of plate appearances (because the 5 hitter bats less often then the 2 and 3 hitter).
                  however I'm pretty sure that won't happen as the 2 spot is traditionally often a mediocre hitter (for whatever reason)
                  I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DClutch View Post
                    BUT Polanco was the ultimate guy in terms of the 'old school' idea. Jim Leyland loved him. He never struck out, always put the ball in play. He would hit .360 with 2 strikes.
                    He's a career .248 hitter with 2 strikes. About .270 as a Tiger. Pretty good though, since the league average is about .180.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/200...your-lineup-by
                      The Two Hole

                      The old-school book says to put a bat-control guy here. Not a great hitter, but someone who can move the lead-off hitter over for one of the next two hitters to drive in.

                      The Books says the #2 hitter comes to bat in situations about as important as the #3 hitter, but more often. That means the #2 hitter should be better than the #3 guy, and one of the best three hitters overall. And since he bats with the bases empty more often than the hitters behind him, he should be a high-OBP player. Doesn't sound like someone who should be sacrificing, does it?
                      The #2 hitter get the 2nd most PA's over the course of a season (logical, right?). He needs to be a good hitter. Do you want a good hitter, or a poor hitter to bat more often?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by ipitch View Post
                        He's a career .248 hitter with 2 strikes. About .270 as a Tiger. Pretty good though, since the league average is about .180.
                        He did hit .350 in '07. It was a while ago so my memories not as sharp. He hit .345 overall. Magglio hit .363 that year. The Tigers had a nice offense that year.

                        I hope Polanco stays healthy with Miami. He'll probably hit 2nd for them with the lack of major league talent on that squad

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I agree that the #2 hitter should be highly productive. But it seems like managers in general are under some old school of thinking that the position in the order isn't as important (maybe that's not the right word) as others at the top of the lineup. To me, it seems as though many of these managers are willing to give up outs in almost any situation simply to move a leadoff runner up a bag. As I've read here on these boards and other sites, it's rarely a good idea to give up free outs.

                          Here in Philly, we have Charlie Manual - a typical old school type of manager. He prefers the Earl Weaver type of going for the 3-run homer which worked well a few years back. As this team has aged, he's tried to adapt to a bit more of a station to station style. But by doing so, he's let some of the worst hitters in the game bat 2nd - such as Michael Martinez and Wilson Valdez on too many occasions (one occasion is too many for me, but it's been much more than that). His idea, I'm guessing, is that if a hitter is that bad, there's no inner fight in his mind as to whether to have him give up an out. If somebody's on 1B, his answer is written on the wall. Either bunt or slap the ball on the ground and don't make a double play. Had his #2 hitter been somebody like Chase Utely, that situation would make his head explode and he'd be second-guessing all the time.
                          "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by filihok View Post
                            http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/200...your-lineup-by

                            The #2 hitter get the 2nd most PA's over the course of a season (logical, right?). He needs to be a good hitter. Do you want a good hitter, or a poor hitter to bat more often?
                            I have read that too. I would not put the better hitter at 2 but the 2 guy certainly should be a very good guy. a lot of managers rotate players between the 6,7 (sometimes even 8) spot and the 2 spot which shows how much value they put into the 2 hitter.

                            the reason behind putting the big boppers into the 4 and 5 hole is to give them the chance to hit multiple guys in with one swing (at the 2 spot you can drive in one guy at best). however you can only drive in guys that get on and more often then not the pitcher has the advantage and the 4 hitter is not getting on with bases loaded but with 0 on in the second or 1 on 2 out in the first. especially if you put weak hitters in the 1 and 2 spot.
                            Last edited by dominik; 01-01-2013, 04:47 PM.
                            I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by dominik View Post
                              (at the 2 spot you can drive in one guy at best).
                              This is, of course, false:
                              Originally posted by the above article
                              The Books says the #2 hitter comes to bat in situations about as important as the #3 hitter, but more often.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X