Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fibonacci Win Points

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fibonacci Win Points

    Fibonacci Win Points is used to determine a how a manager has done in the post season. You take the number of wins and multiply by winning % and then add how many games above .500 the manager is in the postseason. The top 5 major league managers with the highest FWP are:

    Joe Torre 75.7
    Tony LaRussa 39.6
    Joe McCarthy 37.9
    Sparky Anderson 34.0
    Casey Stengel 32.7

    What are thoughts on Fibonacci Win Points?

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/ar...he-postseason/

  • #2
    Originally posted by Orioles5 View Post
    Fibonacci Win Points is used to determine a how a manager has done in the post season. You take the number of wins and multiply by winning % and then add how many games above .500 the manager is in the postseason. The top 5 major league managers with the highest FWP are:

    Joe Torre 75.7
    Tony LaRussa 39.6
    Joe McCarthy 37.9
    Sparky Anderson 34.0
    Casey Stengel 32.7

    What are thoughts on Fibonacci Win Points?

    http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/ar...he-postseason/
    For my Single Ballot HOF project (link in sig), I tried to come up with a numerical ranking system for managers which combined success with longevity. The first thing I tried was win differential (W-L), but that does Connie Mack an unjust ranking. So then I tried wins times W% and liked that better. Here is a list of career leaders (regular season only). Turns out that Bill James's Fibonacci Win Points are simply the sum of those two approaches: W*W%+W-L. I don't really see the merit in tacking on the win differential, but it does create an interesting mathematical coincidence.
    *** Submit your personal HOF as your ballot for the Single Ballot BBF Hall of Fame! *** Also: Buck the Fraves!

    Comment

    Ad Widget

    Collapse
    Working...
    X