Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Are analytics undervalueing elite relievers?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Are analytics undervalueing elite relievers?

    I often read that anyone can relieve and the sabermetric community seems to think that you just Need to take a hard throwing SP prospect with fringy control and make him an elite reliever. while SP is of course still more important than RP, the Price of top relievers really has gone through the Roof. The industry thinks that relief pitching is more important than many analysts in the saber community think. even some very sabermetric organisations have paid high prizes.

    Aroldis chapman:
    for half a year cubs gave up a top 30 prospect and a top100 prospect

    craig kimbrel:
    two top50 prospects

    Ken giles (not even that elite, just one really good year):
    two top100 Kind of prospects (albeit Appell seems to be a bust)

    If you look at WAR vs the Surplus value of the prospects those are terrible deals. even in a fantastic season a top reliever will barely top 2.5 WAR and a top30 prospect might easily offer 50 millions of Surplus value.

    however the industry seems to think differently. Are they valueing them differently? or is that purely a sellers market Thing i.e. Teams wanting to get those relievers so that not somebody else gets them and beats you with the reliever?
    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-c...lite-reliever/
    I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

  • #2
    From Jayson Stark's ESPN article Trading Chapman does not mean the Yankees are Selling:
    Trading Chapman, however, is eminently logical. Yes, he is a nice luxury to have, but as I pointed out when the deal was made, it was going to be nearly impossible to improve on the performance of the back end of the 2015 bullpen, when sans Chapman the Yankees' record when leading after six innings was 66-3, when leading after seven, 73-2, and after eight, 81-0.
    Last edited by four tool; 07-26-2016, 04:20 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      It's a seller's market and we're dealing with more irrational people that cling to particular dogmas in that sport so much it seems to affect them psychologically. It's been clearly demonstrated by studies that it's not a good idea to use your best reliever at the end of the game, but instead in any high-leverage situation where they're most needed. Yet, management, media, players and even fans alike insist that if you upset the accepted order of things, everything goes wrong.
      46 wins to match last year's total

      Comment


      • #4
        Torres is the bauble the Yankees got for Chapman. McKinney kind of has the failed prospect stink starting to ooze off him. He was looking great in A ball and the future was rosy but he has not done well since moving up to AA ball.

        I personally think the Cubs overpaid for 20 or so innings but for whatever reason Theo and Co. have focused on the pen as a way to upgrade the team. In a way I get it. You aren't going to trade for a big time position player because the team is loaded up with them and getting a SP would cost a lot more. So what is left? The pen. Plus you had that bad stretch where the starters were not able to go deep and it severely taxed the pen as well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Yeah it is mostly about torres, mckinney doesn't seem to live up to the Hype. I never was that high on mckinney anyway. he has an advanced Approach at the plate which made his hit tool Play up at lower Levels but I think his Tools are not really MLB starter stuff. he has an OK hit tool but not great either and his defense and arm is not spectacular to make up for it.

          basically you have an average hit tool with below average power and defense suited for an OF Corner.

          Still torres is a high Price for half a year of a relief pitcher, you don't usually give up a top30 for that. of course chapman is not just a reliever but the hardest throwing guy in history and one of the most effective ever but for half a year that is still a very big Price.
          I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

          Comment


          • #6
            I read that you can use a higher percentage of relief innings in the postseason than in the RS, probably because there are more off days. I remember the Cards in 2011 often plugging the Starters early during their WS run.

            Maybe a reliever has extra value for a Team that is almost a sure Thing to make the postseason.
            I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

            Comment


            • #7
              Am I mistaken in the assumption that historically any investment in a relief pitcher is a short term one?

              Except for a handful of players, closers usually do not remain elite for long.

              We focus on Rivera, Hoffman, and to a lesser extent the Wagners of the world (who I would argue was closer to Rivera than Hoffman), but the vast majority do not have that type of consistency and longevity. So that would be why teams are usually not willing to sell the farm for one.
              "Batting stats and pitching stats do not indicate the quality of play, merely which part of that struggle is dominant at the moment."

              -Bill James

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sturg1dj View Post
                Am I mistaken in the assumption that historically any investment in a relief pitcher is a short term one?

                Except for a handful of players, closers usually do not remain elite for long.

                We focus on Rivera, Hoffman, and to a lesser extent the Wagners of the world (who I would argue was closer to Rivera than Hoffman), but the vast majority do not have that type of consistency and longevity. So that would be why teams are usually not willing to sell the farm for one.
                Exactly. When Rivera leaves and is replaced by guys for several years who have just slightly worse save % - you can see why (smart) teams will not overpay. Most every team has a #3 starter in their minors that could be a good closer. You can invest the same amount of money on 10 AAA guys (and one will likely stick) as you would paying huge for a star reliever.
                1885 1886 1926 1931 1934 1942 1944 1946 1964 1967 1982 2006 2011

                1887 1888 1928 1930 1943 1968 1985 1987 2004 2013

                1996 2000 2001 2002 2005 2009 2012 2014 2015


                The Top 100 Pitchers In MLB History
                The Top 100 Position Players In MLB History

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Bothrops Atrox View Post
                  Exactly. When Rivera leaves and is replaced by guys for several years who have just slightly worse save % - you can see why (smart) teams will not overpay. Most every team has a #3 starter in their minors that could be a good closer. You can invest the same amount of money on 10 AAA guys (and one will likely stick) as you would paying huge for a star reliever.
                  well Theo epstein gave away his no.1 prospect for chapman and cleveland tradad miller for their best prospect and another top100 guy.

                  it is true that a good AAA prospect can give you solid relieving but most AAA prospects don't literally strike out half of the big league hitters they face even for one inning. I think the market for relievers has definitely changed, they certainly slightly overpaid for chapman and miller just using prospect Surplus value but they are not dumb and probably believe that this pays off (yesterday an AAA prospect might indeed have been better than chapman but more often than not he gets the Job done- there is a reason why he has the lowest FIP in MLB history).

                  relieving of course inflates ERA+ but still not any MILB pitcher can mow down big league hitters even for one inning. of course over one inning BABIP Magic will yield you a scoreless inning more often than not even with an average pitcher but over a year a closer like chapman, Mo, hoffman or kimbrel probably does pay off especially because they do it for a Long time every year and not just 1-2 years like most relievers
                  I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dominik View Post
                    well Theo epstein gave away his no.1 prospect for chapman and cleveland tradad miller for their best prospect and another top100 guy.

                    it is true that a good AAA prospect can give you solid relieving but most AAA prospects don't literally strike out half of the big league hitters they face even for one inning. I think the market for relievers has definitely changed, they certainly slightly overpaid for chapman and miller just using prospect Surplus value but they are not dumb and probably believe that this pays off (yesterday an AAA prospect might indeed have been better than chapman but more often than not he gets the Job done- there is a reason why he has the lowest FIP in MLB history).

                    relieving of course inflates ERA+ but still not any MILB pitcher can mow down big league hitters even for one inning. of course over one inning BABIP Magic will yield you a scoreless inning more often than not even with an average pitcher but over a year a closer like chapman, Mo, hoffman or kimbrel probably does pay off especially because they do it for a Long time every year and not just 1-2 years like most relievers

                    Kimbrel and Chapman's longevity and consistency still remains to be seen. There is such a small group that remained consistently dominant over a long period of time for modern closers.

                    Rivera
                    Wagner
                    Hoffman
                    Nathan (arguable)
                    Papelbon (arguable)

                    You hope you are getting one of these guys, but you could be getting an Eric Gagne or Heath Bell.

                    (note: when I say modern the era I am speaking of is basically Rivera's career because Rivera seems to be the gold standard that closers are unfairly compared with)
                    "Batting stats and pitching stats do not indicate the quality of play, merely which part of that struggle is dominant at the moment."

                    -Bill James

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      As I've always said, LOL at paying big money to closers

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X