Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Triple Crown in first 162 games?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Triple Crown in first 162 games?

    I am liking the two quizzes about 35+ HR's and 180+ Strikeouts in a players first 162 ML games. I don't have access to the data to do this myself, so I will defer to those who do and are proficient at it. Is there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?

  • #2
    Originally posted by LarrySC View Post
    I am liking the two quizzes about 35+ HR's and 180+ Strikeouts in a players first 162 ML games. I don't have access to the data to do this myself, so I will defer to those who do and are proficient at it. Is there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?
    That is going to be difficult if notmimpossiblemto do, since any given players individual 162 games won't necessarily correlate to a season. It could be over many seasons, with starts and stops in the year and days off. To figure out if he was the best over his specific 162 games doesn't make any sense.

    But if I had to guess I'd say no

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by LarrySC View Post
      Is there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?
      For which season? Players rarely play 162 games in their first season. I think the question you might want to ask is "which players have had the best triple crown numbers in their first 162 games?"

      Comment


      • #4
        If I had to guess who might have been close it would probably be Ted Williams in '39 with a dozen or so games in '40 and Pujols in 2001 with a carry-over game in '02.
        "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Brooklyn View Post
          That is going to be difficult if notmimpossiblemto do, since any given players individual 162 games won't necessarily correlate to a season. It could be over many seasons, with starts and stops in the year and days off. To figure out if he was the best over his specific 162 games doesn't make any sense.

          But if I had to guess I'd say no
          I think it could be done with some thought. Pick numbers from each of the TC categories (BA, HR, RBI) and get lists for those players that had that particular number for their first 162 games (which don't have to be in the same season).

          We might could estimate it would take a .320 BA, 35 HR, and 120 RBI. Then compare the lists to see if anyone is listed on all three lists.

          Comment


          • #6
            Wally Berger went .320 with 38 home runs and 124 RBI through his first 162 games.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by brett View Post
              Wally Berger went .320 with 38 home runs and 124 RBI through his first 162 games.
              That is a good start!

              Comment


              • #8
                Dug around and found a few, though I'm probably missing somebody really obvious.

                Ted Williams

                .328 - 33 / 154

                Albert Pujols

                .330 - 37 / 133

                Joe Dimaggio

                .329 - 33 / 147

                Chuck Klein

                .361 - 44 / 130

                Rudy York (average not in the same class, but those HR / RBI... )

                .306 - 55 / 167
                "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

                Comment


                • #9
                  Does anyone know if there is a quick way to calculate this on B-reference.com? I am trying to figure out Hal Trosky.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by willshad View Post
                    Does anyone know if there is a quick way to calculate this on B-reference.com? I am trying to figure out Hal Trosky.
                    I did it manually on BB-R, but got tired after 40 or so players. Solid call on Trosky...

                    Hal Trosky

                    .322 - 35 / 144
                    "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

                    Comment

                    Ad Widget

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X