I am liking the two quizzes about 35+ HR's and 180+ Strikeouts in a players first 162 ML games. I don't have access to the data to do this myself, so I will defer to those who do and are proficient at it. Is there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Triple Crown in first 162 games?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LarrySC View PostI am liking the two quizzes about 35+ HR's and 180+ Strikeouts in a players first 162 ML games. I don't have access to the data to do this myself, so I will defer to those who do and are proficient at it. Is there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?
But if I had to guess I'd say no
-
Originally posted by LarrySC View PostIs there a way to determine if a player would have the numbers in his first 162 ML games to win a Triple Crown?
Comment
-
If I had to guess who might have been close it would probably be Ted Williams in '39 with a dozen or so games in '40 and Pujols in 2001 with a carry-over game in '02."Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brooklyn View PostThat is going to be difficult if notmimpossiblemto do, since any given players individual 162 games won't necessarily correlate to a season. It could be over many seasons, with starts and stops in the year and days off. To figure out if he was the best over his specific 162 games doesn't make any sense.
But if I had to guess I'd say no
We might could estimate it would take a .320 BA, 35 HR, and 120 RBI. Then compare the lists to see if anyone is listed on all three lists.
Comment
-
Dug around and found a few, though I'm probably missing somebody really obvious.
Ted Williams
.328 - 33 / 154
Albert Pujols
.330 - 37 / 133
Joe Dimaggio
.329 - 33 / 147
Chuck Klein
.361 - 44 / 130
Rudy York (average not in the same class, but those HR / RBI... )
.306 - 55 / 167"Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers
Comment
-
Originally posted by willshad View PostDoes anyone know if there is a quick way to calculate this on B-reference.com? I am trying to figure out Hal Trosky.
Hal Trosky
.322 - 35 / 144"Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment