The 1942 Dodgers won 104 games. Dolph Camilli and Pete Reiser both scored 89 runs to lead the team. (Reiser only played 125 games).
That team-leading run total is pretty low for a 100 win team.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Questions about 100-win Teams
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GiambiJuice View PostThere were plenty of high RBI totals before Ruth, though. Gavy Cravath had 128 in 1913. Sam Crawford had 120 in 1920 despite only 5 home runs.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ben Grimm View PostFrank Schulte led the 1909 Cubs with 60 RBI. I find RBIs to be a bit like HRs and should likely only count teams from 1920 or so to present.
Leave a comment:
-
Frank Schulte led the 1909 Cubs with 60 RBI. I find RBIs to be a bit like HRs and should likely only count teams from 1920 or so to present.
Leave a comment:
-
Larry Doyle led the 101-win NY Giants with 73 RBI in 1913. Not sure if that's the record...
Leave a comment:
-
A few teams had pitchers with 15 wins during the regular season. But the 2004 Yankees were led by Javier Vazquez & Jon Lieber - both with 14.
Leave a comment:
-
Jim Northrup led the 1968 Tigers in hits with 153. No big surprise in that year.
Leave a comment:
-
For HRs (post-Ruth), the '42 Cardinals were led by Enos Slaughter's total of 13. More recently, the '77 Royals had Mayberry and Cowens topping the team with 23.
Leave a comment:
-
Questions about 100-win Teams
I don't have the answers.
I was just looking at the 1988 Mets and noticed that their leader in hits was Kevin McReynolds with 159. That seems like a very low total to lead a 100-team. It got me thinking, what is the lowest number of X that led 100+ win teams...
Hits?
Home Runs? (Since Ruth
Runs?
RBI?
Pitcher wins?Tags: None
Ad Widget
Collapse
Leave a comment: