Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Should Nate McLouth lead off?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Should Nate McLouth lead off?

    Maybe Nate McLouth would perform better from a different spot in the line up.

    Sure , he is probably our best option for the lead off job, but if he gives us 5+ more HRs and .30 pts higher batting average, maybe we move him back in the order and try someone else.

    or maybe swap him and prado
    My Blog
    Adventures of a Las Vegas Local
    http://www.AdamVanWildest.com

  • #2
    Originally posted by adamsowell View Post
    Maybe Nate McLouth would perform better from a different spot in the line up.

    Sure , he is probably our best option for the lead off job, but if he gives us 5+ more HRs and .30 pts higher batting average, maybe we move him back in the order and try someone else.

    or maybe swap him and prado
    I would be against that, the only other realistic option for the leadoff spot is Yunel in my opinion. The reason McLouth is the best fit for the leadoff spot is his ability to take a walk and solid speed, Yunel and Martin lack one of them (Yunel lacks speed and Prado doesn't walk enough) which makes them a problem area. I really believe a full season healthy will get McLouth back in the 25 HR range and perhaps getting his BA up to .260 or so which will also raise his OBP.

    I realize Prado's OBP was higher then McLouth's last year but one was based almost entirely on BA which is a problem when he hits a slump as he will struggle to bring any real value to the team.
    Extend Prado!!!

    Comment


    • #3
      PBF put it perfectly. I was going to say the same thing, but he did it first.
      46 wins to match last year's total

      Comment


      • #4
        lookie lookie

        they put McLouth inthe 2 hole and ... he finally gets a hit!
        My Blog
        Adventures of a Las Vegas Local
        http://www.AdamVanWildest.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by adamsowell View Post
          lookie lookie

          they put McLouth inthe 2 hole and ... he finally gets a hit!
          And he's back to the leadoff spot and 0-3ing again. He really must be having some kind of vision problem.
          46 wins to match last year's total

          Comment


          • #6
            he must not be mentally there when he is in the leadoff. His lifetime stats are much better batting in another spot in the line up. I say switch him and Martin Prado and we'll get more production out of Nate.
            My Blog
            Adventures of a Las Vegas Local
            http://www.AdamVanWildest.com

            Comment


            • #7
              i'd rather try diaz/melky there. i really like prado in the 2-hole.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by adamsowell View Post
                he must not be mentally there when he is in the leadoff. His lifetime stats are much better batting in another spot in the line up. I say switch him and Martin Prado and we'll get more production out of Nate.
                You would also suffer through slumps of Prado as your leadoff man which would result in a lot of one out starts to a game. I have a hard time buying the "mental" stuff when it comes to leading off, he isn't a bad hitter in the leadoff spot and the stats for batting number 2 aren't a very large sample size to draw any real conclusions. I also just don't believe moving people around in the order will make them better hitters, it will help them in certain stats (OBP in front of a pitcher, RBIs in the 3rd or 4th spot for example) but I don't think someone will go from a good hitter to a great hitter because he is one spot down in the order.

                He is struggling this spring training which should be a concern but I have serious doubts if he was moved to another spot in the order he would all of a sudden be a better hitter, it is the same argument that Kelly Johnson fans made all the time and I didn't buy it then. I admit I could be completely wrong but I just don't believe that the batting order matters except from a team aspect, not a single player aspect.
                Extend Prado!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                  You would also suffer through slumps of Prado as your leadoff man which would result in a lot of one out starts to a game. I have a hard time buying the "mental" stuff when it comes to leading off, he isn't a bad hitter in the leadoff spot and the stats for batting number 2 aren't a very large sample size to draw any real conclusions. I also just don't believe moving people around in the order will make them better hitters, it will help them in certain stats (OBP in front of a pitcher, RBIs in the 3rd or 4th spot for example) but I don't think someone will go from a good hitter to a great hitter because he is one spot down in the order.

                  He is struggling this spring training which should be a concern but I have serious doubts if he was moved to another spot in the order he would all of a sudden be a better hitter, it is the same argument that Kelly Johnson fans made all the time and I didn't buy it then. I admit I could be completely wrong but I just don't believe that the batting order matters except from a team aspect, not a single player aspect.
                  the only argument i could see is that he is pressing in the leadoff spot. Trying too much to get things started, that's why all the K's. Swinging at pitching that he shouldn't be. I remember a couple games last year in the 8-hole where he was walking alot. At least then he could be on base and advance by a steal or a bunt.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                    the only argument i could see is that he is pressing in the leadoff spot. Trying too much to get things started, that's why all the K's. Swinging at pitching that he shouldn't be. I remember a couple games last year in the 8-hole where he was walking alot. At least then he could be on base and advance by a steal or a bunt.
                    I think I should rephrase my statement about his struggles, it isn't something to worry about but is something to watch.

                    Also McLouth struggled last year not just in the leadoff spot but just in general, his power and speed were down (hamstring could have been the problem with the speed) and the recent news of him having eye troubles last year could have been the cause for the lowering of power. I am just not worried about it and I don't see any real reason to switch McLouth, mainly because there is no real replacement. Prado isn't built for the number 1 spot and from an overall lineup construction point of view only Escobar could make sense but his overall bat down in the order is better equipped to give protection to McCann or Glaus. The way I see it you hurt your overall lineup by moving McLouth out the leadoff spot more then the potential benefits.
                    Extend Prado!!!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      1.) Melky
                      2.) Prado
                      3.) Chipper
                      4.) Glaus
                      5.) McCann
                      6.) Escobar
                      7.) Heyward
                      8.) Diaz/ (McLouth/ Schafer/Hinske)
                      My Blog
                      Adventures of a Las Vegas Local
                      http://www.AdamVanWildest.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by adamsowell View Post
                        1.) Melky
                        2.) Prado
                        3.) Chipper
                        4.) Glaus
                        5.) McCann
                        6.) Escobar
                        7.) Heyward
                        8.) Diaz/ (McLouth/ Schafer/Hinske)
                        That is a bad move if that is the opening day lineup. McLouth shouldn't lose his job because of a bad spring, I realize it isn't a good thing but it is far to early to give Melky a starting job.

                        Overall on the idea I have changed my mind a little as in my mind there is actually a suitable replacement that won't mess up certain things for the overall lineup. The only person that could replace McLouth (in my opinion) at the top of the order is Jason Heyward. Heyward has better speed then Escobar, a better eye then Prado and could have just as much power as McLouth, it would be putting a lot of pressure on Heyward and he is far from your normal leadoff guy but he is the only one in my opinion that offers the overall package when compared with other options. (though I still wouldn't move McLouth )
                        Extend Prado!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          To put it in even less words: If Cabrera is starting over McLouth, the Braves are screwed.
                          46 wins to match last year's total

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                            That is a bad move if that is the opening day lineup. McLouth shouldn't lose his job because of a bad spring, I realize it isn't a good thing but it is far to early to give Melky a starting job.

                            Overall on the idea I have changed my mind a little as in my mind there is actually a suitable replacement that won't mess up certain things for the overall lineup. The only person that could replace McLouth (in my opinion) at the top of the order is Jason Heyward. Heyward has better speed then Escobar, a better eye then Prado and could have just as much power as McLouth, it would be putting a lot of pressure on Heyward and he is far from your normal leadoff guy but he is the only one in my opinion that offers the overall package when compared with other options. (though I still wouldn't move McLouth )
                            Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
                            To put it in even less words: If Cabrera is starting over McLouth, the Braves are screwed.
                            actually, i have been pretty impressed with cabrera this spring. I know spring training doesn't mean much, but if mclouth doesn't get off to a good start there is no reason to keep him in the top spot. For what it's worth he has K-ed in about 1/3 of his ABs this ST. I don't take much from ST, but you should at least be making contact, meaning you are at least seeing the ball well, right? I think melky has the speed and diaz has the surprise factor to steal some bases at the top and cause some trouble if need be. I agree that heyward would be too much pressure at the top. Plus, I like him after escobar trying to drive in runs.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              there is always the possibility to use Heward on the top of the order later on in the season if he settles in okay. Not sure how long bobby will go with nate he is regular season is anything like ST

                              About ST...

                              The reason people say to never put too much stock in ST is because hitters are seeing a lot of back up players, pitchers are working on stuff, sometimes throwing mostly fastball to get command down, ect ect. But when you are a hitter against these pitchers and striking out like nate is... thats still making a strong statement that something is wrong.
                              My Blog
                              Adventures of a Las Vegas Local
                              http://www.AdamVanWildest.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X