Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Braves 2010/11 Offseason Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Fingers crossed.

    I don't think he's as bad as his numbers suggest but it's just best for all concerned if Ken and the Braves part ways.
    "It's like watching a Western. It's slow, so you can watch the chess moves. Nothing seems to happen, but when it goes down, it goes down big." - Howard Bryant

    3 6 10 21 29 31 35 41 42 44 47

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Los Bravos View Post
      Fingers crossed.

      I don't think he's as bad as his numbers suggest but it's just best for all concerned if Ken and the Braves part ways.
      Right. It was the perfect storm of unluckiness and badness that did him in last season.
      46 wins to match last year's total

      Comment


      • #33
        A nice post on MLBtraderumors.com showing the payroll commitments, the Braves ring in at $61.867 (I believe that is before any options being picked up).
        Extend Prado!!!

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
          A nice post on MLBtraderumors.com showing the payroll commitments, the Braves ring in at $61.867 (I believe that is before any options being picked up).
          i really hope the braves get a reliable, consistent OF guy. whether it's a 30HR guy or a 30-40 steals guy I don't care and it doesn't have to be werth or crawford. just something that you can count on for 150 games whether you are facing a righty or a lefty.

          edit: and two guys that I want alot more on the braves after watching this postseason are juan uribe (already really wanted him for his pop off the bench and versatility i think he could replace omar if the braves wanted to include him in a deal) and cody ross (very big in the clutch so far).
          Last edited by chip&smoltz95; 10-24-2010, 12:36 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
            edit: and two guys that I want alot more on the braves after watching this postseason are juan uribe (already really wanted him for his pop off the bench and versatility i think he could replace omar if the braves wanted to include him in a deal) and cody ross (very big in the clutch so far).
            I doubt the Giants give up Ross after this big postseason. I think before the postseason they would have tried to lockup both Burrell and Huff but now I think they will go for Uribe and Huff instead. I think they are looking at an OF of Ross in right, Torres in CF, and some form of platoon with DeRosa being the main guy.

            I like Infante's versatility over Uribe's offensive edge, I also think Uribe will get more money then Infante will make.
            Extend Prado!!!

            Comment


            • #36
              I would be really interested if especially Matt Kemp or Michael Cuddyer came into the picture of possibilities for the outfield.

              Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
              I have seen many link the possibility of trading Jair for Colby Rasmus, it has some real hurdles with the biggest one being the fact that it would be extremely stupid for the Cardinals to move Rasmus. He is one of their few quality bats and without him it will be Pujols and Holliday then a bunch of average to below average players that won't scare anyone. Unless La Russa an Rasmus are at each other's throats there is no reason to trade Rasmus.

              Here are some names I think the Braves may look at trading for.

              Chris Young :: Not a fan if you want to know why just look at his Home and Away Splits.

              Matt Kemp :: Similar rumors to Rasmus with management not being completely happy with him, adds some power, speed, and defense but a whole lot of strikeouts as well.

              Cody Ross :: Braves might not need to trade for him as he could get non-tendered, Braves have been linked to him in the past (including this year) and has been a solid player though isn't really much of an impact player.

              Luke Scott :: Some questions about his power away from Oriole Park but is still a good option for power, defense is a major question mark.

              Michael Cuddyer :: Not sure if he will be on the market but if the Twins give any hints he is I think the Braves will be calling.

              Carlos Quentin :: Not the healthiest guy in the world and like several others one should look at his Home/Road splits.

              Some Free Agents I think they will at least kick the tires on are.

              Pat Burrell :: Perhaps the Braves best bet at "impact" power, bad defense comes with him.

              Johnny Damon :: Questions about his ability to play everday in the field, nothing great but would provide good leadoff option allowing to lengthen the lineup overall.

              Jeremy Hermida :: Still young, had his best year under Freddi in Florida and would likely come cheap, low risk solid reward.

              There is no right answer, Rasmus would be the best but I have serious questions about if it can/will happen, and as Frank Wren said they will have to get creative to solve any problems and if they can find a big bat is a serious question.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                i really hope the braves get a reliable, consistent OF guy. whether it's a 30HR guy or a 30-40 steals guy I don't care and it doesn't have to be werth or crawford. just something that you can count on for 150 games whether you are facing a righty or a lefty.

                edit: and two guys that I want alot more on the braves after watching this postseason are juan uribe (already really wanted him for his pop off the bench and versatility i think he could replace omar if the braves wanted to include him in a deal) and cody ross (very big in the clutch so far).
                I couldn't agree more with what you said. That is my exact feelings on this matter. We would be in serious business if we could get possibly two. I wish we had just a couple big boppers in our lineup. One with big time raw power and the other consistent get on base steal threat. I'd prefer them to be switch or right handed though consider it's a pretty dominant lefty lineup and our lefty on lefty matchups aren't very consistent.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Tyler4 View Post
                  I couldn't agree more with what you said. That is my exact feelings on this matter. We would be in serious business if we could get possibly two. I wish we had just a couple big boppers in our lineup. One with big time raw power and the other consistent get on base steal threat. I'd prefer them to be switch or right handed though consider it's a pretty dominant lefty lineup and our lefty on lefty matchups aren't very consistent.
                  ... why do we need an "on base steal" threat? What is with people's obsession with that? What the Braves need are people who get on base, make consistent contact and are smart baserunners. They don't necessarily have to have "speed".
                  46 wins to match last year's total

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
                    ... why do we need an "on base steal" threat? What is with people's obsession with that? What the Braves need are people who get on base, make consistent contact and are smart baserunners. They don't necessarily have to have "speed".
                    My guess people want the Braves to be more aggresive and less passive, stealing bases does put pressure on the defense but one guy really won't do a ton unless they steal 50 or 60 bases with a low caught rate. I personally want the Braves to simply have productive bats and I could careless about the extras the bring.

                    Edit ::
                    Originally posted by Tyler4 View Post
                    I couldn't agree more with what you said. That is my exact feelings on this matter. We would be in serious business if we could get possibly two. I wish we had just a couple big boppers in our lineup. One with big time raw power and the other consistent get on base steal threat. I'd prefer them to be switch or right handed though consider it's a pretty dominant lefty lineup and our lefty on lefty matchups aren't very consistent.
                    To put it blunt the Braves won't be doing that unless something serious happens, ie. Liberty Media raises the payroll (which by all accounts isn't happening) or Chipper retires which isn't going to happen before Spring Training if at all.

                    The Braves will likely stay at around $85 Million in payroll and even with conservative estimates of arbitration and letting people that could be deemed as not needed (Diaz) the Braves might have around $10 Million in payroll room. The only way the Braves add an impact bat is going to be a trade and the best option to trade is still Jair, who I believe will be traded even with what Frank Wren is saying, and even then the names people bring up aren't making me jump around in anticipation and almost all are flawed. There are 4 names that interest me and all 4 have major obstacles and aren't likely to be traded anyway.

                    Colby Rasmus :: Might be the best overall CFer in the majors right now, problem is why in the hell would St. Louis do this. The Cardinals have 3 legit hitters on their team named Pujols, Holliday, and Rasmus so unless Tony LaRussa thinks Rasmus is the Devil trying to take his soul any move of Rasmus without a serious bat coming bat in return makes no sense.

                    Coco Crisp :: Good defense, solid hitter and can steal bases, the A's are likely to pick up his option and until the Trade deadline I doubt they would trade him.

                    Brett Gardner :: The Yankees would have to sign either Werth or Crawford (and if they were to sign Cliff Lee even I doubt that happens unless they do another move), even then I would have to guess Granderson would be the first name put on the block with his contract. My personal choice but one that I just have majors doubts will happen.

                    Jacoby Ellsbury :: Rumors persist that he has fallen out of favor with the Boston front office but the Braves don't match up real well in my opinion unless the Braves trade major prospects something I don't want to see.

                    I think the most likely thing to happen is the Braves stick McLouth in the 7th hole and then sign a pair to platoon in LF of either Diaz (I think they non-tender him and resign him at a lower price) and someone like Jeremy Hermida who Fredi has coached before.

                    The biggest thing is the Braves simply need to get healthy and stay that way.
                    Last edited by PureBaseballFan; 10-26-2010, 09:06 PM.
                    Extend Prado!!!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                      My guess people want the Braves to be more aggresive and less passive, stealing bases does put pressure on the defense but one guy really won't do a ton unless they steal 50 or 60 bases with a low caught rate. I personally want the Braves to simply have productive bats and I could careless about the extras the bring.
                      Exactly, thank you.
                      46 wins to match last year's total

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
                        ... why do we need an "on base steal" threat? What is with people's obsession with that? What the Braves need are people who get on base, make consistent contact and are smart baserunners. They don't necessarily have to have "speed".
                        i think with a serious base-stealing threat at the top and heyward presumably in the 2-hole, that's a lot of speed at the top followed by a hopefully healthy and productive chipper, mccann and prado (yes, i am okay with prado batting fifth, or flipping chipper and prado, yea i know right). Whether it's stealing bases, staying out of double plays, going 1 to third on a single to the OF, scoring from 1st on a play in the gap. It makes it easier to manufacture runs when you aren't hitting home runs three times a game.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                          i think with a serious base-stealing threat at the top and heyward presumably in the 2-hole, that's a lot of speed at the top followed by a hopefully healthy and productive chipper, mccann and prado (yes, i am okay with prado batting fifth, or flipping chipper and prado, yea i know right). Whether it's stealing bases, staying out of double plays, going 1 to third on a single to the OF, scoring from 1st on a play in the gap. It makes it easier to manufacture runs when you aren't hitting home runs three times a game.
                          Okay, then let me pose this to you: can the Braves afford anyone with that extra burst of speed? It's an overvauled commodity right now. The only one that even makes sense to me is Carl Crawford, and he's going to get piles of money thrown at him.
                          46 wins to match last year's total

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
                            Okay, then let me pose this to you: can the Braves afford anyone with that extra burst of speed? It's an overvauled commodity right now. The only one that even makes sense to me is Carl Crawford, and he's going to get piles of money thrown at him.

                            agreed, but werth could be a 20 base steal threat too. I also think via trade the braves could look at m.bourn/h.pence if either is avaiable. matt kemp or brett gardner (don't want curtis granderson) could be a possibility. as far as cheap goes I know coco crisp could be an option as PBF mentioned, but I like Scott Podsednik (only cost 1.6mil last season). he's hit over .300 the last two seasons with 30+ steals.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                              agreed, but werth could be a 20 base steal threat too. I also think via trade the braves could look at m.bourn/h.pence if either is avaiable. matt kemp or brett gardner (don't want curtis granderson) could be a possibility. as far as cheap goes I know coco crisp could be an option as PBF mentioned, but I like Scott Podsednik (only cost 1.6mil last season). he's hit over .300 the last two seasons with 30+ steals.
                              Let me put it this way: I'd much rather have the Braves overpay Jayson Werth AND have him suck for most of the deal than view Scott Podsednik as any kind of solution. I do not trust him keeping up his average or his steals next year in the least. (He hit .297 last year.)
                              46 wins to match last year's total

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
                                Let me put it this way: I'd much rather have the Braves overpay Jayson Werth AND have him suck for most of the deal than view Scott Podsednik as any kind of solution. I do not trust him keeping up his average or his steals next year in the least. (He hit .297 last year.)
                                i'd rather have pods than coco crisp. just saying if we are gonna go the cheap route.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X