Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Braves 2010/11 Offseason Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    question regarding b.j. upton: is he really that much of an upgrade over where mclouth was at the time that we traded for him? I don't know if that's a good trade, especially if we have to give up an elite arm (which we didn't really have to do in the mclouth trade).

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
      question regarding b.j. upton: is he really that much of an upgrade over where mclouth was at the time that we traded for him? I don't know if that's a good trade, especially if we have to give up an elite arm (which we didn't really have to do in the mclouth trade).
      The short answer: no.

      The long answer: Upton would be an upgrade in the outfield, only because the outfield outside of Heyward was so bad. However, his batting average has decreased each year since hitting .300 in 2007. His counting stats are superfically fine and his SB% was exquisite last year (42/51 = 82.4%). However his OBP is now bottomed out to .313 and .322 the last couple of seasons. I don't believe he's worth giving up anything of actual value. I'd much rather sign Coco Crisp than trade for Upton.
      46 wins to match last year's total

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
        The short answer: no.

        The long answer: Upton would be an upgrade in the outfield, only because the outfield outside of Heyward was so bad. However, his batting average has decreased each year since hitting .300 in 2007. His counting stats are superfically fine and his SB% was exquisite last year (42/51 = 82.4%). However his OBP is now bottomed out to .313 and .322 the last couple of seasons. I don't believe he's worth giving up anything of actual value. I'd much rather sign Coco Crisp than trade for Upton.
        i know mclouth didn't average probably as many steals per season, but wasn't that a point of success that he had as well? i agree though, I totally don't think he's worth a JJ, teheran, delgado, vizcaino or even a beachy or hoover.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
          i know mclouth didn't average probably as many steals per season, but wasn't that a point of success that he had as well?
          McLouth didn't steal nearly as many bases as Upton, but his high success rate was much more consistent. He did steal seven of nine bases last season (77.8%). Ironically, his steal rate decreased dramatically once he got to Atlanta (7-7 with PIT in 2008, 12-18 (66.7%) with ATL after he was traded). Maybe Bobby just really didn't know when to send him.
          46 wins to match last year's total

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by SamtheBravesFan View Post
            The short answer: no.

            The long answer: Upton would be an upgrade in the outfield, only because the outfield outside of Heyward was so bad. However, his batting average has decreased each year since hitting .300 in 2007. His counting stats are superfically fine and his SB% was exquisite last year (42/51 = 82.4%). However his OBP is now bottomed out to .313 and .322 the last couple of seasons. I don't believe he's worth giving up anything of actual value. I'd much rather sign Coco Crisp than trade for Upton.
            Crisp's option has already been picked up so that isn't an option.

            Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
            question regarding b.j. upton: is he really that much of an upgrade over where mclouth was at the time that we traded for him? I don't know if that's a good trade, especially if we have to give up an elite arm (which we didn't really have to do in the mclouth trade).
            Upton right now is not worth an Elite arm but his upside could be worth a quality arm. While he has declined the previous two years in major stats it is hard to overlook the numbers he put up at 22 and 23 in '07 and '08.

            To put it simply any trade for Upton is a risk with upside, the highest level pitcher I would offer would be J.J. Hoover but with the Rays depth in the rotation (they are looking to trade starter by all reports) I am guessing they would be looking for position players more then anything else.
            Extend Prado!!!

            Comment


            • #66
              whats up with ankiel?? I have heard that the Braves did not pick up his option and I have heard that they have....does anyone know for sure? I would like to see us keep him in some aspect.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by tlondon View Post
                whats up with ankiel?? I have heard that the Braves did not pick up his option and I have heard that they have....does anyone know for sure? I would like to see us keep him in some aspect.
                They didn't and I doubt they bring him back.
                Extend Prado!!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                  To put it simply any trade for Upton is a risk with upside, the highest level pitcher I would offer would be J.J. Hoover but with the Rays depth in the rotation (they are looking to trade starter by all reports) I am guessing they would be looking for position players more then anything else.
                  I agree with your assessment of BJU and the possiblity of a trade for him. Do you think the Rays would be looking for a prospect position player or someone more established? Any suggestions about who could fill either bill?
                  "It's like watching a Western. It's slow, so you can watch the chess moves. Nothing seems to happen, but when it goes down, it goes down big." - Howard Bryant

                  3 6 10 21 29 31 35 41 42 44 47

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Los Bravos View Post
                    I agree with your assessment of BJU and the possiblity of a trade for him. Do you think the Rays would be looking for a prospect position player or someone more established? Any suggestions about who could fill either bill?
                    I could see them looking for a more "established" player in the OF or at 1B but considering the Braves need an OFer that really doesn't match up well. The Rays have no real need to unload Upton unless they are cutting payroll and still need to move someone after trading one of their starters.

                    If they want more real prospects even then there aren't a ton of option as far as valuable prospects (not named Freeman). The Braves just aren't swimming in position prospects like a lot of times this decade, the Braves make their money developing pitching prospects with the occasional big time position prospect (McCann, Andrus, Heyward), the only guy that might draw some serious interest is Christian Bethancourt but I would prefer to see the Braves hang onto him because his value could skyrocket quickly as a catcher.
                    Extend Prado!!!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Los Bravos View Post
                      I agree with your assessment of BJU and the possiblity of a trade for him. Do you think the Rays would be looking for a prospect position player or someone more established? Any suggestions about who could fill either bill?
                      Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                      I could see them looking for a more "established" player in the OF or at 1B but considering the Braves need an OFer that really doesn't match up well. The Rays have no real need to unload Upton unless they are cutting payroll and still need to move someone after trading one of their starters.

                      If they want more real prospects even then there aren't a ton of option as far as valuable prospects (not named Freeman). The Braves just aren't swimming in position prospects like a lot of times this decade, the Braves make their money developing pitching prospects with the occasional big time position prospect (McCann, Andrus, Heyward), the only guy that might draw some serious interest is Christian Bethancourt but I would prefer to see the Braves hang onto him because his value could skyrocket quickly as a catcher.
                      what about cory Harrilchak? he's playing pretty well in the AFL (yes, i know offensive is usually high here) and then maybe have to give up schafer too. I heard the rays were looking for elite prospect to unload upton. I just don't think he's worth it when he could end up being mclouth.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                        what about cory Harrilchak? he's playing pretty well in the AFL (yes, i know offensive is usually high here) and then maybe have to give up schafer too. I heard the rays were looking for elite prospect to unload upton. I just don't think he's worth it when he could end up being mclouth.
                        Cory could have some value but he isn't going to draw a ton of value for a few reasons.

                        I don't disagree that giving up something elite for Upton is risky but at 26 and with some quality seasons in the past the potential reward could be worth it. I personally wouldn't do any trade for any Upton not named Justin and that isn't happening.
                        Extend Prado!!!

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by PureBaseballFan View Post
                          Cory could have some value but he isn't going to draw a ton of value for a few reasons.

                          I don't disagree that giving up something elite for Upton is risky but at 26 and with some quality seasons in the past the potential reward could be worth it. I personally wouldn't do any trade for any Upton not named Justin and that isn't happening.
                          according to bowman the braves don't have much interest in trading for upton. probably his questionable production combined with some attitude problems, being the main reasons I would guess. Also, that don't seem at all keen on trading JJ, KK looks like he might not be a lock to be traded and I don't think the braves should try and trade lowe. For two reasons, one the braves will still have to eat a good chunk of his salary and he's not gonna bring much back. Also, I think he's leadership and the way he pitched in the playoffs could be good for the remainder of his contract.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            well, kk has been optioned to the AA team. i thought there was something in his contract about having to approve a move to the minors?

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by chip&smoltz95 View Post
                              well, kk has been optioned to the AA team. i thought there was something in his contract about having to approve a move to the minors?
                              No, I don't see anything about that.
                              46 wins to match last year's total

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Jon Morosi View Post
                                http://twitter.com/jonmorosi/status/4581620195532800
                                well, if it's true. there you go PBF.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X