Simple question, do you want Dusty Baker's managing career with the Cubs to end after the 2006 season?
Let's not just say "Dusty sucks!" or "he doesn't teach fundamentals". Give me some real reasons.
IMO, It all depends on this coming season. It's the first time since '03 that I'm not heading into the season with confidence in the Cubs. I'm thinking (and this seems like a stretch to me) 85-88 wins, which probably would not equate to a playoff spot. If the Cubs can meet that mark or go over it, I wouldn't mind Dusty getting another 2 or 3 years. With the Cubs, he has brought us the closest to a World Series as we've been in 50 years. And if we did get rid of him, who else (a proven manager) is available?
Let's not just say "Dusty sucks!" or "he doesn't teach fundamentals". Give me some real reasons.
IMO, It all depends on this coming season. It's the first time since '03 that I'm not heading into the season with confidence in the Cubs. I'm thinking (and this seems like a stretch to me) 85-88 wins, which probably would not equate to a playoff spot. If the Cubs can meet that mark or go over it, I wouldn't mind Dusty getting another 2 or 3 years. With the Cubs, he has brought us the closest to a World Series as we've been in 50 years. And if we did get rid of him, who else (a proven manager) is available?
Comment