Foxsports.com and Dayn Perry gave the Cubs a "D" for their off season signing/trades. They gave the Colorado Rockies and the Cincinnati Reds a "C". I think someone there is against our Cubs really hard. They gave us the same rating as they did the Florida Marlins....??? I think that analysis is total bs. What do you guys think?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Cubs' Off Season That Bad?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by LipsanderFoxsports.com and Dayn Perry gave the Cubs a "D" for their off season signing/trades. They gave the Colorado Rockies and the Cincinnati Reds a "C". I think someone there is against our Cubs really hard. They gave us the same rating as they did the Florida Marlins....??? I think that analysis is total bs. What do you guys think?
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/5198854
-
I'd say it's an appropriate grade, at least in the general vicinity, the highest I'd go is a C- or a stretched C. Cub fans are lullying themselves into a false sense of security with the addition of Howry and Eyre that the bullpen is vastly improved. And Dayn is correct (didn't think I'd ever say that) in that Pierre is overrated and Jones screams a "we have to do something".
Over last season's team, we haven't made any major improvements that will increase our standing in the division or league.
We're going to need Wood, Prior and Zambrano healthy all year and putting up career years in order for us to go anywhere.What a Batted Ball is Worth (in terms of a run):
Line Drive: .356
HBP: .342
Non-Intentional Walk: .315
Intentional Walk: .176
Outfield Fly: .035
Groundball: -.101
Bunts: -.103
Infield Fly: -.243
Strikeout: -.287
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Sacamento
We're going to need Wood, Prior and Zambrano healthy all year and putting up career years in order for us to go anywhere.
Comment
-
St. Louis and Houston might have gotten worse but we did not get that much better. We finished 10 games behind Houston last year and 21 games behind St. Louis. Our additions and their subtractions are not 10 and 21 games worth!
I still place the Cubs no higher than 3rd in the Division this year. They'll win 85 games, but still finish at least 10 games behind St. Louis
Comment
-
But think like this. If some miracle happens and Wood has a career year then thats almost the equivalent of making a big off-season trade, w/o even losing someone. If Miller has a semi good year (10-6 3.70 ERA) then thats like a semie-great off season signing. If we have Prior the whole season then theres a little lets get 5 more wins trade. If Jones is like 2001 theres a big aquisition. If Pierre, Howry and Eyre are what they are then theres 3 solid players added. If Cedeno and Murton are what they were last year then theres 2 more huge moves. Now looking at it like that thats probably the best off-season in a looooong time. And I dont think you realized how bad the Astros and Cards got injured this off-season. I would say that if we dont make 1st then we will onlt be a few games out. I honestly believe this year will be better than 2003. And FOX Sports rating the MArlins or Reds same or the better is complete BS.Last edited by Cubsfan97; 02-07-2006, 02:00 PM."I don't like to sound egotistical, but every time I stepped up to the plate with a bat in my hands, I couldn't help but feel sorry for the pitcher."
-Rogers Hornsby-
"People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring."
-Rogers Hornsby-
Just a note to all the active members of BBF, I consider all of you the smartest baseball people I have ever communicated with and love everyday I am on here. Thank you all!
Comment
-
I agree
I agree with you Cubsfan 97.
I think if their starters can stay healthy for most of the year then they do have a good chance at winning the division. I know it's hard to keep everyone healthy but they don't have Garciaparra so we know he wont be hurting the Cubs anymore. I actually look for the Cubs to break 90 wins this year. My prediction is that they will go 94-68. and get a wild card spot. I think the Cardinals will just edge them out of the division by 2 games.Can you say S O R I A N O !!!
Comment
-
I think Howry and Eyre are an improvement over these two.
The Cubs did have to get a right fielder unless you wanted to throw Hairston out there or bring Burnitz back one more year. Jacque certainly wasn't the best RF available, but I'd take him over Burnitz, Reggie Sanders, Preston Wilson or Encarnacion.
I wouldn't pick the Cubs to win the division, but they look better than they were last year. Send Dusty off into the sunset and that would add 8-10 extra wins.beware of the censorship police
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cubsfan97But think like this. If some miracle happens and Wood has a career year then thats almost the equivalent of making a big off-season trade, w/o even losing someone. If Miller has a semi good year (10-6 3.70 ERA) then thats like a semie-great off season signing. If we have Prior the whole season then theres a little lets get 5 more wins trade. If Jones is like 2001 theres a big aquisition. If Pierre, Howry and Eyre are what they are then theres 3 solid players added. If Cedeno and Murton are what they were last year then theres 2 more huge moves.What a Batted Ball is Worth (in terms of a run):
Line Drive: .356
HBP: .342
Non-Intentional Walk: .315
Intentional Walk: .176
Outfield Fly: .035
Groundball: -.101
Bunts: -.103
Infield Fly: -.243
Strikeout: -.287
Comment
-
Originally posted by burger eaterI think Howry and Eyre are an improvement over these two.
The Cubs did have to get a right fielder unless you wanted to throw Hairston out there or bring Burnitz back one more year. Jacque certainly wasn't the best RF available, but I'd take him over Burnitz, Reggie Sanders, Preston Wilson or Encarnacion.
Jones' Splits vs Lefties
Career .227/.277/.339/.616
2005 .201/.247/.370/.617
2004 .245/.328/.329/.657
2003 .269/.310/.393/.703
2002 .213/.259/.331/.590
2001 .182/.224/.200/.424
2000 .230/.269/.297/.567
I wouldn't pick the Cubs to win the division, but they look better than they were last year. Send Dusty off into the sunset and that would add 8-10 extra wins.
As for Dusty costing 8-10 games, no. The difference between a good-in game manager or a poor one, is 3-5 games at most. Put LaRussa at the Cubs helm and the end result will be the same, the Cubs not making the playoffs.What a Batted Ball is Worth (in terms of a run):
Line Drive: .356
HBP: .342
Non-Intentional Walk: .315
Intentional Walk: .176
Outfield Fly: .035
Groundball: -.101
Bunts: -.103
Infield Fly: -.243
Strikeout: -.287
Comment
-
Over a 2005 Remmy and Hawkins, yes, but not over Remmy/Hawkins in their first seasons in Chicago.
That's simply not true, Bob. Do you wish it was true? It's not, but I can understand if you wish it was. Howry & Eyre both had better years last year than Hawkins or Remlinger had in their best years as Cubs. Hawkins stunk the joint up last year and did more of the same for the Giants.
Remlinger is done.
Jones can't hit lefties. Neither can Burnitz. Sanders is 38 years old and coming off an injury. Preston Wilson has knee problems. Jacque's contract is certainly movable if the Cubs want to trade him after 2006.
Better than what was expected from the players at the beginning of 2005? No, not even.
I hoped for the best, but I thought last year's team looked all-around weaker than the 2006 roster looks.
As for Dusty costing 8-10 games, no. The difference between a good-in game manager or a poor one, is 3-5 games at most. Put LaRussa at the Cubs helm and the end result will be the same, the Cubs not making the playoffs.
Corey/Neifi at the top of the order, Hawkins as closer, Dempster in the rotation, Rusch in the pen, the usual mishandling of the bullpen. All evidence that Dusty is a major liability.Last edited by burger eater; 02-07-2006, 07:59 PM.beware of the censorship police
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob SacamentoThat's a lot of IFs that we're dependent on.
Secondly, up the middle (C/2B/SS/CF), we're arguably one of the weakest teams in the majors... Barrett is average to slightly above average offensively, but quite honestly, calls a poor game behind the plate. Look at pitchers ERAs last year when Barrett was behind the plate compared to Blanco. I want to say it was something like one run per game difference! I'm sorry, but Barrett does not produce a run a game offensively to make up for that.
Cedeno is going to be good someday, but I can't put that much faith in an unproven commodity
Hairston/Perez are good utility players, but substandard everyday players.. See: Todd Hollandsworth. Walker is my choice at 2B but I don't think he'll see a pitch as a Cub this year.
Pierre is a definite upgrade over CP in CF, but as Bob has said on many occasions, he's a bit overrated. I wouldn't go as far as to call him one of the most overrated players in the game, but I think he gets a little more credit than he is due. He's going to get on base a lot more than CP, which is obviously a good thing....but there's still nobody, other than Todd Walker that I could trust in the #2 hole to move Pierre over to set up the big boys. But given the Cubs' lack of a vote of confidence in Walker, I don't have a good feeling myself.
Hey, I'd love to look back on this in October and say I was dead wrong, but there are just too many questions with this team. I give Hendry a C for his offseason moves. He has addressed some of the question marks on this team, but unfortunately, has added a few different ones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob SacamentoThat's a lot of IFs that we're dependent on."I don't like to sound egotistical, but every time I stepped up to the plate with a bat in my hands, I couldn't help but feel sorry for the pitcher."
-Rogers Hornsby-
"People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring."
-Rogers Hornsby-
Just a note to all the active members of BBF, I consider all of you the smartest baseball people I have ever communicated with and love everyday I am on here. Thank you all!
Comment
-
Originally posted by burger eaterThat's simply not true, Bob. Do you wish it was true? It's not, but I can understand if you wish it was. Howry & Eyre both had better years last year than Hawkins or Remlinger had in their best years as Cubs. Hawkins stunk the joint up last year and did more of the same for the Giants.
Remlinger is done.
Player Year Team Age G IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA
Hawkins 2003 Twins 31 74 77.1 69 20 16 4 15 75 1.86 1.09 .239
Howry 2005 Indians 32 79 73.0 49 23 20 4 16 48 2.47 0.89 .191
Player Year Team Age G IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA
Remlinger 2002 Braves 37 73 68.0 48 17 15 3 28 69 1.99 1.12 .198
Eyre 2005 Giants 33 86 68.1 48 21 20 3 26 65 2.63 1.08 .200
As for Hawkins and Remlinger first years as a Cub, fans can only hope that Eyre and Howry do as well in the first year.
Player Year Team G GS W L SV CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB K ERA WHIP BAA
Hawkins 2004 Cubs 77 0 5 4 25 0 0 82.0 72 27 24 10 14 69 2.63 1.05 .233
Remlinger 2003 Cubs 73 0 6 5 0 0 0 69.0 54 30 28 11 39 83 3.65 1.35 .211
It's the following years that were deal breakers and caused both of them to be shipped out.
Jones can't hit lefties. Neither can Burnitz. Sanders is 38 years old and coming off an injury. Preston Wilson has knee problems. Jacque's contract is certainly movable if the Cubs want to trade him after 2006.
2005 Burnitz vs Jones against Lefties
Burny .236/.268/.445/.713
Jones .201/.247/.370/.617
Career-wise
Burny .242/.320/.448/.767
Jones .227/.277/.339/.616
Better than who expected? You?... maybe. I expected Nomar to get injured, Hollandsworth to prove he wasn't a full time player and Corey to be as streaky as he's always been. I hoped for the best, but I thought last year's team looked all-around weaker than the 2006 roster looks.
It can't be proven how many games Dusty cost the Cubs last year, but 3-5 is an extremely conservative estimate. Lee was having an MVP year and Dusty stood by helplessly with his thumb in his ass while he put the 2 worst OBP guys in front of him for over 600 AB's.
Batting 1st
Players G BA R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB/SBO AVG OBP SLG OPS
CP/Perez 58 242 25 56 8 1 6 20 10 45 6/9 .231 .262 .347 .609
Hairston 78 306 43 81 22 1 4 28 29 36 8/16 .265 .344 .382 .726
Batting 2nd
Players G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB/SBO AVG OBP SLG OPS
CP/Perez 83 346 40 89 15 2 9 30 10 45 9/11 .257 .278 .390 .668
Hairston/Walker 69 275 40 77 15 2 11 30 21 24 1/2 .280 .331 .469 .800
Overall between 1st/2nd
Between Walker/Hairston 147 581 83 158 37 3 15 58 50 60 9/18 .272 .330 .420 .750
Between Patterson/Neifi 141 588 65 145 23 3 15 50 20 90 15/20 .247 .271 .372 .643
Corey/Neifi at the top of the order, Hawkins as closer, Dempster in the rotation, Rusch in the pen, the usual mishandling of the bullpen. All evidence that Dusty is a major liability.
Dusty could be the greatest "cook" in the world but if he's not given the "right ingredients" by management then the main course is going to come up subpar.Last edited by Bob Sacamento; 02-10-2006, 04:13 AM.What a Batted Ball is Worth (in terms of a run):
Line Drive: .356
HBP: .342
Non-Intentional Walk: .315
Intentional Walk: .176
Outfield Fly: .035
Groundball: -.101
Bunts: -.103
Infield Fly: -.243
Strikeout: -.287
Comment
Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment