Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Paul Konerko for Jeff Shaw

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Paul Konerko for Jeff Shaw

    I know there was a "What if the Dodgers didn't trade" thread somewhere, but I can't find it.

    Anyway, looking at some Jim Thome related stuff reminded me of Paul Konerko which reminded me of one of my least favorite trades.



    (I posted this to my blog, hope there's nothing wrong with linking to that here. Click through to be able to click through to the player pages).


    One trade that always bothered me was the Paul Konerko for Jeff Shaw trade in 1998. Trading a cost-controlled slugging first baseman for a reliever is rarely a good idea.

    How'd the trade work out when viewed through the WAR lens?

    1998: Karros 2.6, Shaw -0.2, Konerko -0.3
    1999: Karros 5.2, Shaw 0.9, Konerko 2.0
    2000: Karros 1.8, Shaw 0.3, Konerko 1.7
    2001: Karros -0.1, Shaw 0.3, Konerko 2.4
    2002: Karros 1.7, Shaw (retired), Konerko 2.2

    From 1998 to 2002 Karros and Shaw produced 12.5 combined WAR for the Dodgers while Konerko produced 8 WAR for the White Sox.

    Dodgers win the trade? right? They ended up with 4 more wins.

    Well, there's also the issue of salary.
    From 1998 to 2002 Karros and Shaw earned a combined $44.9 million.
    From 1998 to 2002 Konerko earned $6.8 million.

    If LA hadn't made the trade they would have had an extra $38 million with which to try and buy 4 more wins. I think they may have been able to achieve that.


    An interesting thing to look at is just how similar Konerko and Karros were during that period (1998-2002):
    Karros: 823 Games, 3289 PA, 128 HR, 481 RBI, .274/.334/.457 for a 108 wRC+
    Konerko: 802 Games, 3164 PA, 129 HR, 475 RBI, .279/.342/.471 for a 108 wRC+

    Hard to get more identical than that.

    However, Konerko was more of a DH than 1B man. Karros accounted for 17 defensive runs saved while Konerko was at -8. That leaves total WAR at that time at 11.2 for Karros and 7.6 for Konerko.

    Still, that's a trade I'd like to have back.

    *Karros, Konerko and Shaw data from FanGraphs.
    *Salary data from Baseball-Reference player pages

  • #2
    The one odd thing about that trade that I remember is that it occured right at the all-star break (perhaps on he lsat day of ergular season competition before the ASG). Shaw asked if he could appear in the ASG in a Reds uniform, but the commissioner rejected that plea. He had to appear in a Dodgers uniform (a team he had never played for) or be replaced on the NL
    all-stars roster. Reluctantly, Shaw wore a Dodgers uni.

    How Konerko's talent could be so badly misjudged twice in about six months and resulted in trades back in 1998-99 is beyond me. The second trade brought him to the chicago white sox where he has been the team's cornerstone for the last 15 years. He's already a 2,000 games, 2,000 hits, 400 home runs man and by 2015 he should surpass 1,500 RBI also.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by philliesfiend55 View Post
      The one odd thing about that trade that I remember is that it occured right at the all-star break (perhaps on he lsat day of ergular season competition before the ASG). Shaw asked if he could appear in the ASG in a Reds uniform, but the commissioner rejected that plea. He had to appear in a Dodgers uniform (a team he had never played for) or be replaced on the NL
      all-stars roster. Reluctantly, Shaw wore a Dodgers uni.
      I'd totally forgotten about that.

      I had also, mercifully, forgotten that after the season Shaw was allowed to demand a trade, which he parlayed into a $8 million raise.

      How Konerko's talent could be so badly misjudged twice in about six months and resulted in trades back in 1998-99 is beyond me. The second trade brought him to the chicago white sox where he has been the team's cornerstone for the last 15 years. He's already a 2,000 games, 2,000 hits, 400 home runs man and by 2015 he should surpass 1,500 RBI also.
      Konerko is actually, pretty overrated.

      He's a been a decent, consistent player, but he only has 30 WAR in 8700 PA's which is about 2.4 WAR per 700 PA's (ie...a full season). As noted above, his defense is what really brings his value down.

      Still, the trade for Shaw was not a good one.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by filihok View Post
        I'd totally forgotten about that.

        I had also, mercifully, forgotten that after the season Shaw was allowed to demand a trade, which he parlayed into a $8 million raise.


        Konerko is actually, pretty overrated.

        He's a been a decent, consistent player, but he only has 30 WAR in 8700 PA's which is about 2.4 WAR per 700 PA's (ie...a full season). As noted above, his defense is what really brings his value down.

        Still, the trade for Shaw was not a good one.
        Konerko is underrated and I think war makes him underrated. His defense isn't that bad and war is known to be less than perfect when it comes to defensive war. He's one of the toughest players i've ever seen and a natural leader because of his toughness. Very underrated.
        "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

        "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

        Comment


        • #5
          Sometimes, looking back, these bad trades happen because of certain circumstances leading up to them. We've seen high-end prospects moved for players who can make a difference for a contending team making a run. The odd thing about this trade is that when it happened, the Dodgers were in 3rd place in the West - 12.5 games out of first. They were also 8 games out of the WC with seven teams ahead of them, so it's not like they had a clear path to make the postseason.

          Due to Piazza's turning down the extension he was offered, he was moved in a package that brought back Gary Sheffield, Charles Johnson and a couple other aged outfielders. Sheffield had a few years left, and was best used in LF. Mondesi - already on the team, wasn't really a CF and was moved to RF, a position better suited for him. Karros, while not great, was just turning 30 and was solid enough for the position.

          I don't think LA really knew what Konerko would be for them. Everybody knows he came up as a catcher, but his faster route to the majors was by playing a different position. What I'm not certain alot of people do know is that the Dodgers tried him for a full year at 3B - hoping to fill a void there. He had a great season at the plate that year, but was a bit too stiff and big for 3B. They also had a slicker-fielding 3B in high-A ball who was three years younger but had a solid bat himself and was considered a true fieldere at the position. That was Adrian Beltre who was up at 19 in 1998 and - in a small sample size - outproduced Konerko at the plate.

          So, on paper, every position Konerko played was covered by somebody with at least 3 years left on their contracts and were either highly regarded kids (Konerko was BBA's #2 prospect that year, but Beltre was #3), or in the primes of their careers.

          In that, I can't fault the Dodgers for moving him. What I don't like is moving any power-hitting prospect with very good value for a relief pitcher - especially if I'm 10+ games out of my division. To me, closers are luxury items for teams that are in contention and that's the only real need they've got left.

          If I were the Dodgers GM then (wasn't Lasorda GM at the time of Konerko's trade?), I'd rather move a lesser prospect for other teams' set-up men or middle relievers - or even try some in house options so I'd know what I've got next year. If anything, I'd rather have held onto Konerko and move him if I could get a CF in return. That was a definite position they needed nor did they have in the minors at the time. They also would have avoided the need to sign a 36-year-old Devon White to a multi-year deal heading into 1999.
          "Chuckie doesn't take on 2-0. Chuckie's hackin'." - Chuck Carr two days prior to being released by the Milwaukee Brewers

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by chicagowhitesox1173 View Post
            war is known to be less than perfect when it comes to defensive war.
            In small samples, yes.

            FanGraphs' WAR uses UZR. UZR was made public in 2002. Since 2002 Konerko has played 15000 innings at 1B. He best season per UZR was 2.8 runs above average, his worst season was -13 runs below average. His total UZR since 2002 is -23 runs or -3 runs per 150 games. A bit below average.

            There's also Total Zone, which is computed completely independently. Since 2002 Konerko has a high season of 7 runs above average and a low season of -12 runs below average. In total Total Zone has Konerko at -25 runs since 2002. Almost identical to UZR.

            When two independent systems both rate a player that similarly over 11 seasons, I think it is reasonable to conclude they might be in the ballpark as to his true ability - below average in this case.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by filihok View Post
              I'd totally forgotten about that.

              I had also, mercifully, forgotten that after the season Shaw was allowed to demand a trade, which he parlayed into a $8 million raise.


              Konerko is actually, pretty overrated.

              He's a been a decent, consistent player, but he only has 30 WAR in 8700 PA's which is about 2.4 WAR per 700 PA's (ie...a full season). As noted above, his defense is what really brings his value down.

              Still, the trade for Shaw was not a good one.
              Myself and all 30 MLB mangers wiould love to have an "overrated" star like Konerko to build their team around.
              His averages over 14 years for the White Sox are 29.6 Home runs, 93.4 runs batted in, and a .283 batting average. he's practically the personification of "Constistantcy".

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by philliesfiend55 View Post
                Myself and all 30 MLB mangers wiould love to have an "overrated" star like Konerko to build their team around.
                That's pretty much the definition of 'overrated'

                His averages over 14 years for the White Sox are 29.6 Home runs, 93.4 runs batted in, and a .283 batting average. he's practically the personification of "Constistantcy".
                Sure.
                None of those numbers tell me anything about how he related to the average first baseman over that time.

                WAR does

                And WAR says he just a bit better than the average 1B

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by filihok View Post
                  That's pretty much the definition of 'overrated'


                  Sure.
                  None of those numbers tell me anything about how he related to the average first baseman over that time.

                  WAR does

                  And WAR says he just a bit better than the average 1B
                  I think he is a Little overrated but average (A 121 OPS+ is hardly great for a 1B-what is average for 1B? 110?) in another thread you attacked People who said that all those 90 OPS+ TB hitters suck and now you call a 6 time all star a bit above average?

                  A guy like konerko that Posts a 120-130 OPS+ every year (in the last 10 years he mostly did) while hitting 30+ bombs is the guy that a lot of times like at 1B.
                  Last edited by dominik; 02-05-2013, 01:39 PM.
                  I now have my own non commercial blog about training for batspeed and power using my training experience in baseball and track and field.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by dominik View Post
                    in another thread you attacked
                    Sigh...show me this 'attack' that I levied upon the innocent posters here on BBF



                    A guy like konerko that Posts a 120-130 OPS+ every year (in the last 10 years he mostly did) while hitting 30+ bombs is the guy that a lot of times like at 1B.
                    Compare Konerko's offensive performance to the average offensive performance of a first baseman.

                    I'll get you started.
                    Last year Konerko hit .371/.486
                    The average 1Bman hit .336/.442

                    Konerko's OBP was about 10% above average
                    His SLG was about 10% above average

                    Last year the league average SS hit .306/.368.
                    10% better than .306 is .337
                    10% better than .368 is .405

                    Andrelton Simmons hit .335/.416. Not considering defense, does Simmons seem like an average, good, or great player for his position?


                    *2012 MLB Splits

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      At the time, Konerko wasn't going to be chosen over Eric Karros. Now, to list Konerko's numbers is fine, but that was the issue in trading HIM.

                      But the trade involved a couple of other things. One, Lasorda was indeed interim GM, and this was after having been on the sidelines between his heart attack and retirement, when the Dodgers made him vice president, and Fox wanting a housecleaning. At the time, the rumbling was that Lasorda had been knifing Fred Claire and Bill Russell at every opportunity because he wanted back in the action. It was in this period that Bobby Valentine became Mets manager and suggested that he might like Lasorda to be his bench coach, and the Dodgers said Tommy would always have a home in the organization but they wouldn't stand in his way, and the talk went away; I've always believed Lasorda and his pal Valentine planted this as part of an effort to get Lasorda more authority with LA.

                      So, Lasorda got to be GM (and, apparently, he and Claire haven't spoken since, and I know Russell wouldn't speak to him for a long time; whether he does now, I don't know). He wanted to prove he could make a trade and made this deal. AFTER making the deal, it came out that Shaw had a clause in his contract that allowed him to leave if he had been traded, and Lasorda hadn't known it. I was hysterical with laughter at the time. I'd spent 20 years marveling at how many mistakes Lasorda made as a manager, and now he had the chance to do it as a GM!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by dominik View Post
                        I think he is a Little overrated but average (A 121 OPS+ is hardly great for a 1B-what is average for 1B? 110?) in another thread you attacked People who said that all those 90 OPS+ TB hitters suck and now you call a 6 time all star a bit above average?

                        A guy like konerko that Posts a 120-130 OPS+ every year (in the last 10 years he mostly did) while hitting 30+ bombs is the guy that a lot of times like at 1B.
                        Of the 46 first basemen with over 2000 PA since Konerko started playing, his 121 OPS+ is 23rd.

                        For what it's worth, he's 40th in fielding runs with -49. Looking at the advanced stats, I don't see anything that jumps off the page. But I would bet by reputation he's an "average fielder," while all the evidence shows he is well below average.

                        i don't know his reputation as a base runner. I would bet he doesn't have one. He's -65 base running runs above average. That's for three reasons: Over his career he's stolen 9 bases. He's grounded into 263 double plays. His "extra base taken" average is 26%. That's lower than Mo Vaughan's.

                        Because he's a sterling fellow, no one goes around looking for his weak spots. But he's leaking value everywhere that's not obvious. That's what an overrated player does.

                        He's a good hitter, but only an average hitter for a first baseman. He's not a good fielder, and he's a dreadful baserunner.

                        None of this means he's a bad person, or he's going around trying to fool us into thinking he's better than he is. It's just that he has a lot of holes in his game, and the gapers are the ones most easily overlooked.

                        Edit: This has nothing at all to do with the trade. Konerko is a pet case of mine, a player who seems to be underrated because he's steady, unpublicized, and a good man in the clubhouse, but is considerably overrated because his flaws are off the radar.
                        Last edited by Jackaroo Dave; 02-05-2013, 11:05 PM.
                        Indeed the first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already; so that no blight can so surely arrest all intellectual growth as the blight of cocksureness.--CS Peirce

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The Reds tried to talk Shaw out of retirement so they could bring him back. He lived in Washington Court House, Ohio, at the time, about a hour or so North of Cincinnati. Some media folks considered it a given, considering the bullpen need and he was "available".

                          That was a disappointing time to be a Reds fan.
                          Dave Bill Tom George Mark Bob Ernie Soupy Dick Alex Sparky
                          Joe Gary MCA Emanuel Sonny Dave Earl Stan
                          Jonathan Neil Roger Anthony Ray Thomas Art Don
                          Gates Philip John Warrior Rik Casey Tony Horace
                          Robin Bill Ernie JEDI

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by filihok View Post
                            That's pretty much the definition of 'overrated'


                            Sure.
                            None of those numbers tell me anything about how he related to the average first baseman over that time.

                            WAR does

                            And WAR says he just a bit better than the average 1B
                            I'll start believing you when on a typical game telecast of (enter your hometown team here) instead of posting home runs, RBI, and batting average of the player coming up to bat, teams routinely post WARs and Sabermetric stats. Good hitting stats are just that - good hitting stats, regardless of the position played by the batter.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by philliesfiend55 View Post
                              I'll start believing you when on a typical game telecast of (enter your hometown team here) instead of posting home runs, RBI, and batting average of the player coming up to bat, teams routinely post WARs and Sabermetric stats.
                              You're free to tie your ignorance to the ignorance of others.
                              You're also free to tie your knowledge to the knowledge of others.

                              Your choice


                              5.png
                              *http://www.fangraphs.com/not/index.p...rmetric-bcast/


                              Good hitting stats are just that - good hitting stats, regardless of the position played by the batter.
                              You don't even believe that.
                              Last edited by filihok; 02-06-2013, 09:15 AM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X