Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

The Mets Ownership / Management Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Strawman View Post
    I've been a Mets fan since 1969. I've never boycotted the team. I'm simply buying 95% fewer tickets from the Wilpons now, mainly because my kids no longer want to go since the Reyes debacle - compounded by the Dickey debacle - compounded by the bizarre Alderson regime. It's a total mess.

    I'm not front running. Heck I'm not running. I'll die a Mets fan. But I call it as I see it and I'm far, far from naive. My experience tells me this: there is no plan.

    Indeed, if they sign Bourn, it's pure proof there really is no plan, and as a reactive a signing as *anything* that happened during the (more successful) Minaya era.
    You have your opinion which you have every right to express but again I will lean towards the guys who have made decisions like this for years and have been very successful in the past and are well respected in their field by others who know what they are doing. Most "lifelong Met fans" will begin to pack the house once they begin to win, its alright. I am sure I will also have to pay more for my same seats once the Mets win and my perks will go down, I guess, right or wrong, thats the way things work. My son still loves to go to games. He watched Reyes play for Miami last year, I even bought him a Reyes shirt in Florida last year while we were at spring training. Now he likes Tejada at short and enjoys the way he conducts himself professionally and likes the way he works pitchers and plays a very steady defense. We can go to a Mets game and root for Tejada to do well. We do not need to hate the Mets and hold a grudge because they made a decision not to pay a guy over 100 mil who has had leg issues. People are different, I guess.

    Comment


    • The Mets are in rebuilding mode, there's nothing wrong with that. They're waiting to get Santana and Bay's contracts off the books and that money is expected to be spent on new talent. They should be lining up to be competitive soon, but when they have the foundation in place they need to start spending even above the new money that came off the books. The Wilpons are making a lot of profit through SNY with a below-market TV rights contract that's sheltered from MLB revenue sharing. They need to spend that money, because even with the recent price cuts people still pay a lot of money to see the Mets play and they should be getting adequate value for their money. Sports owners in general have no respect for their fanbases, which is pretty tragic. The exception that comes to mind is George Steinbrenner (his kids have zero respect it's 100% about maximizing profits) and Mark Cuban. If only a guy like Cuban owned the Mets, they would be at the top of the division every year AND they would be profitable
      Last edited by GordonGecko; 02-05-2013, 07:58 AM.

      Comment


      • This is a 2011 non-story that tells most what they already know about Fredo and the city willing to give them anything they want.

        Mike Illitch via his wife Marian is about one inch lower than Fredo on the human garbage scale. He got his taxpayer funded baseball stadium, neglected Tiger Stadium while getting paid maintain it and milked every penny he could get out of it, then had bulldozers waiting to tear into the grandstand within minutes of a court decision to defeat a group trying to make it a museum because he did not want competition to his taxpayer funded ballpark in a place where vacant buildings stand for generations. Now he wants another development where he's paid via the taxpayers for an arena.

        Almost seems Marian Illitch grabbed for this deal from NY in 2011:
        http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article...ts-voted-down#
        Last edited by WEB; 02-05-2013, 03:21 PM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
          I never said you jumped off the bandwagon when the winning stopped and the payroll dried up. I stated that most who have chosen to take the high moral ground and "boycott" the team because of the evil Wilpons will be very forgiving once the team begins to win. That is a frontrunner, plain and simple and they ARE the majority. I am a baseball fan who roots for the Mets. I always thought Met fans were different. We are loyal, maybe to a fault. If I had the courage to be a 10-12 year old Met fan in NYC during the late 70s Yankees run I damn well can survive a 75 win season watching what may become a dominant pitching staff develop. If others can only enjoy the game of baseball if there team wins thats fine. Do not get me wrong, I love to win, but I can enjoy watching young talent develop. I also do not have the time to be fixated on something I despise. If I ever did make a decision to step away from baseball, or the Mets, I would not spend so much time killing them. I would rather spend time on something I enjoy. BTW, you are going to have a field day on this casino story, enjoy!
          More than erroneous here.

          I am boycotting going to Met games but by no means am I a front runner.

          Front running in my opinion is ignoring a team because they are losing. That reason alone is not nearly why I am boycotting this horrible Wilpon owned mess. I need to see a team TRY to win. TRY to put a professional team on the field. TRY to compete. Right now we are not getting any kind of effort at all. We are being slapped in face and told to come back for more.

          RJ if you get slapped in the face by a "partner" (and dont kid yourself - the team/fan relationship should be a partnership) and go back and ask for more...then so be it. Its your choice. I opt to expect an effort on both sides...mine and theirs.

          Like Straw - I have been a Met fan for 40+ years and have gone through some horrendous periods blindly rooting and hoping with very little in return. I find it disgusting to see ownership treat the fans in the manner they have since the stolen money stopped rolling in. Disgusting.

          What I find more disgusting are fellow fans that dont get it. Fans that root for a team because it says METS across their shirt regardless of anything else. I find it disgusting that after 40+ years of rooting for a team through all kinds of crap...and believe me its been mostly crap...that you get called a front runner. It takes a huge amount of nerve for someone to call fans of a team for that many years a front runner.

          You go ahead and love your Wilpon owned Mets while your getting your pocket picked while watching a AA team. Your call.

          Comment


          • A quick definition of "frontrunner" on google basically says someone who only shows interest in a team when they win. By that definition, you or any of the frequent flyers on this site are not "frontrunners" because you are still showing interst even though they are losing. I do think you have a flare for the dramatic when you say this team is not trying? Really?, not at all? Tell that to players who will wear the uniform next year. I root for the players. I do not root for the owners, but I also do not root against them. I believe thats not in a team I like best interests and have no time for the negativity. You also state a fan/team relationship is 2 ways, which it is. You feel the team is not living up to their end of the bargain? Well what exactly is there end of the bargain? Are you looking for a guarantee that your team will win? Thats not going to happen. Do you expect every move will pay instant dividends? thats not realistic. Do you think you deserve more because you live in a certain part of the country and your team should try harder than the other 29 who also want to win? There's another name for that. Do you feel your boycotting this team, which I take as financially(not buying tickets) may actually be slowing down the process of rebuilding this team?

            I have pre bought Met tickets via a partial or season plan for most of the last 30 years. I can honestly say the Mets are more fan friendly now then they have ever been. Please read other threads for examples of perks, dedicated sales reps who actually help you find a location that works for you and believe it or not a price point for tickets that I feel is fair which is supported by me being able to recoup my investment via the secondary market for games I cannot use.

            Now be honest with yourself and ask this question? If the Mets somehow develop a good team under Wilpon Ownership, will you watch more, which increases ad revenue or maybe even purchase tickets, which goes directly into the evil hands that you and others have berated thousand of times in the last few years? Or maybe even ask yourself the question, Have I supported this team financially in the past while they put a winner on the field while fully knowing whose grimmy hands my money was going to? That answer may be more damning? Maybe we cannot call it frontrunning but can we at least agree to call it hypocritical?

            And I do get that me and my family have enjoyed going to Citifield over the last few years despite the lack of championships. I also hope that maybe a good lifes lesson will be taught to my kids. Don't give up on something when its down and sticking with something during bad times makes the enjoyment of the good times even better. Now I think thats why we should be proud to be a Mets fan.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
              A quick definition of "frontrunner" on google basically says someone who only shows interest in a team when they win. By that definition, you or any of the frequent flyers on this site are not "frontrunners" because you are still showing interst even though they are losing. I do think you have a flare for the dramatic when you say this team is not trying? Really?, not at all? Tell that to players who will wear the uniform next year. I root for the players. I do not root for the owners, but I also do not root against them. I believe thats not in a team I like best interests and have no time for the negativity. You also state a fan/team relationship is 2 ways, which it is. You feel the team is not living up to their end of the bargain? Well what exactly is there end of the bargain? Are you looking for a guarantee that your team will win? Thats not going to happen. Do you expect every move will pay instant dividends? thats not realistic. Do you think you deserve more because you live in a certain part of the country and your team should try harder than the other 29 who also want to win? There's another name for that. Do you feel your boycotting this team, which I take as financially(not buying tickets) may actually be slowing down the process of rebuilding this team?

              I have pre bought Met tickets via a partial or season plan for most of the last 30 years. I can honestly say the Mets are more fan friendly now then they have ever been. Please read other threads for examples of perks, dedicated sales reps who actually help you find a location that works for you and believe it or not a price point for tickets that I feel is fair which is supported by me being able to recoup my investment via the secondary market for games I cannot use.

              Now be honest with yourself and ask this question? If the Mets somehow develop a good team under Wilpon Ownership, will you watch more, which increases ad revenue or maybe even purchase tickets, which goes directly into the evil hands that you and others have berated thousand of times in the last few years? Or maybe even ask yourself the question, Have I supported this team financially in the past while they put a winner on the field while fully knowing whose grimmy hands my money was going to? That answer may be more damning? Maybe we cannot call it frontrunning but can we at least agree to call it hypocritical?

              And I do get that me and my family have enjoyed going to Citifield over the last few years despite the lack of championships. I also hope that maybe a good lifes lesson will be taught to my kids. Don't give up on something when its down and sticking with something during bad times makes the enjoyment of the good times even better. Now I think thats why we should be proud to be a Mets fan.
              Actually my kids delivered some pointed advice - and a lesson - for me:

              "Don't be a sucker, Dad!"
              Cleon Jones catches a deep fly ball in F. Scott Fitzgerald's Valley of the Ashes, and a second-grader smiles in front of the black and white television.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
                Now be honest with yourself and ask this question? If the Mets somehow develop a good team under Wilpon Ownership, will you watch more, which increases ad revenue or maybe even purchase tickets, which goes directly into the evil hands that you and others have berated thousand of times in the last few years? Or maybe even ask yourself the question, Have I supported this team financially in the past while they put a winner on the field while fully knowing whose grimmy hands my money was going to? That answer may be more damning? Maybe we cannot call it frontrunning but can we at least agree to call it hypocritical?
                It's absolutely hypocritical, and for many of them the answer will be damming so they will not go near that question.

                The day will come when this team has success again, and that's when they will return to see Fredo and Jeff-R-Us team in their Brooklyn Dodger stadium, many will suddenly defend the newly re-branded tough hard decisions they complain about today which will be spun into what needed to be done to finally produce a winner the so called " right way. "

                History always has a sad way of being selectively rewritten when it finally produces results.
                Last edited by WEB; 02-06-2013, 12:30 PM.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
                  Now be honest with yourself and ask this question? If the Mets somehow develop a good team under Wilpon Ownership, will you watch more, which increases ad revenue or maybe even purchase tickets, which goes directly into the evil hands that you and others have berated thousand of times in the last few years? Or maybe even ask yourself the question, Have I supported this team financially in the past while they put a winner on the field while fully knowing whose grimmy hands my money was going to? That answer may be more damning? Maybe we cannot call it frontrunning but can we at least agree to call it hypocritical?
                  Originally posted by WEB View Post
                  It's absolutely hypocritical, and for many of them the answer will be damming so they will not go near that question.

                  The day will come when this team has success again, and that's when they will return to see Fredo and Jeff-R-Us team in their Brooklyn Dodger stadium, many will suddenly defend the newly re-branded tough hard decisions they complain about today which will be spun into what needed to be done to finally produce a winner the so called " right way. "

                  History always has a sad way of being selectively rewritten when it finally produces results.
                  Few points here. I havent seen Citi Field so if you want to say that my cable money is going to the Wilpons in some way fine. Call that hypocritical. I havent put a dime in their hands by going to the park since the Madoff thing hit the fan. When they did have a winning team the Wilpon thing was not at the forefront so I didnt knowingly support the Wilscums.

                  Now answer a question yourself. Are they really trying? Is the organization really trying? If you think ownership is giving any kind of effort you are just justifying how and why you spend your money. Are the players trying? Or course they are. What does that mean? They have AA & AAA players trying. I can go see the Ducks play and see that 15 minutes from my house. By trying I mean that ownership is putting a Major League team on the field. They are not.


                  WEB -- your beautiful dude. You can spew your crap all you want, but I will never defend anything these Wilscums do. Will I go to a game if I see an organizational/fan partnership where they attempt to put a real team on the field. Yes I probably would. If thats damning then let me be damned......I guess. First and foremost I want a real team on the field.

                  This is all speculation at this point because they are far from having a real team, and history states that there is no way they have a good team over a period of time. Its like Haley's comet. They are good then they fade because building a winning team from top to bottom is something foreign to the Wilscums.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Paulypal View Post
                    Organizational/fan partnership
                    That made my day, and no, I'm not making fun of you.

                    Bloomberg, Mario Cuomo chest bumping with Fredo outside court or some past press conference or development pr schtick or when Fredo tells Bloomberg to send the cops around Willets Point for some nice organizational fan partnership with the eminent domain notices is the only partnership they know.

                    In 2009 Met fans around here sounded like Fredo demanding the generational businesses must go for Fredo's organizational fan partnership.

                    Hey we robbed thousands of people, please take some free land as a reward to go with your taxpayer funded mallpark.

                    After all what's a mallpark without real mall to go with it.

                    But when things finally do turn on the field-GO TEAM GO, winning cures all.

                    They got the public, the neighborhood and the fans by the throat. There's your organizational fan partnership win or lose where it be 2006, 2008, 2009, 2013.

                    Hint, that's the same everywhere. Fredo's only worse in his traits of how he wrecked the brand permanently which has nothing to do with payroll or on field results and his off field issues which are enormous requiring his immediate removal with Jeff-R-Us.

                    For the thirteen teams spending more than the Mets and most of the teams spending less the words organizational fan partnership are the equivalent of hearing the words stick em up as you pay what they tell to to pay for parking, concessions, tickets or the fun stories by dstoffa about Fredo's security chasing down fans for seat jumping and the infamous stories of the convicted felon's security in the Bronx.
                    Last edited by WEB; 02-06-2013, 03:49 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by WEB View Post
                      That made my day, and no, I'm not making fun of you.

                      Bloomberg, Mario Cuomo chest bumping with Fredo outside court or some past press conference or development pr schtick or when Fredo tells Bloomberg to send the cops around Willets Point for some nice organizational fan partnership with the eminent domain notices is the only partnership they know.

                      In 2009 Met fans around here sounded like Fredo demanding the generational businesses must go for Fredo's organizational fan partnership.

                      Hey we robbed thousands of people, please take some free land as a reward to go with your taxpayer funded mallpark.

                      After all what's a mallpark without real mall to go with it.

                      But when things finally do turn on the field-GO TEAM GO, winning cures all.

                      They got the public, the neighborhood and the fans by the throat. There's your organizational fan partnership win or lose where it be 2006, 2008, 2009, 2013.

                      Hint, that's the same everywhere. Fredo's only worse in his traits of how he wrecked the brand permanently which has nothing to do with payroll or on field results and his off field issues which are enormous requiring his immediate removal with Jeff-R-Us.

                      For the thirteen teams spending more than the Mets and most of the teams spending less the words organizational fan partnership are the equivalent of hearing the words stick em up as you pay what they tell to to pay for parking, concessions, tickets or the fun stories by dstoffa about Fredo's security chasing down fans for seat jumping and the infamous stories of the convicted felon's security in the Bronx.
                      Glad I somehow made your day. I will see what I can do tomorrow.

                      Comment


                      • Long time lurker, lifetime Mets fan. Having been a Mets fan since 1962, I find this whole discussion amusing and a little sad. The Mets have ALWAYS been run this way, to greater or lesser degrees. In '62, they left their best players on the bench most of the time, making a business decision that they were going to lose anyway, so they might as well play the "familiar" (read: "old") faces of former Giants and Dodgers to boost attendance. Meanwhile, they just kept stocking the farm system. A lot of highly regarded talent came and went through the 60s--most of them falling far short of successful in the pros--Steve Chilcott, Billy Cotton, Les Rohr, John Glass--until, eventually, some of the kids stuck--McGraw, Harrelson, Swoboda, Ryan, Gentry. They got lucky with Seaver. Soon, there was a core major league team and a farm system full of "the next..." They weren't of course, but the overstocked farm permitted trades that gave the Mets the '69 championship. Some, you'd have liked and some you'd have hated, I'm sure. When Whitey Herzog ran the farm system and Gil was manager, that was the one stretch in their existence the Mets were run smart. But the championship team they'd built--even when they were run smart--only won once. '73 was something of an encore, but that was a fluke; they put together a nice run when it counted, but they weren't a very good team, really, and their complete demise was already well underway. From 74 through 81, roughly, they were a complete joke, each year seemingly more pathetic than the last. You honestly think THIS outfield is worse than the likes of Dwyer, Mangual, Mike Vail and Leon Brown? Really? (and, might I add, Leon Brown was one of my favorite all time Mets, but even so...)

                        From 81 or 2 on, they, again, stocked the farm system and waited until the core was in place. Then they traded off "future stars" for some key pieces, signed a free agent or two and the next thing you know, ol' Jed's a millionaire. But, again, they only won once. I remember when supposed Mets fans demanded Davey's head on a platter because "all he ever does is finish second". This time, their downfall turned out to be trying to build a team around Gregg Jefferies. And, so, back to the wilderness we went.

                        When they rose again in 2000, it was after another long period of stocking the farm and putting the pieces together until they fit well enough to get us back to the Series. And then came Omar. Say what you will, Omar was trying his level best to put a championship team on the field. He spent a lot of money and I have no doubt he had total latitude to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, Omar's level best wasn't all that great and he totally let the farm system go to hell.

                        Here's the thing. As a Mets fan, my love and support for this team has only waivered once and you'd likely be surprised to know that it was the '86 team I hated. I could relate to the '69 team, the '73 team, the 2000 team, and all the years that didn't go so well. That '86 team was a bunch of jerks. I didn't like them. I couldn't root for them. Putting that aside for the moment...

                        I do not concern myself with the ownership. I fully respect Sandy Alderson, I believe he DOES have a plan (that, largely, consists of building the farm system back up and husbanding resources in the interim) and I fully believe he has full autonomy to persue his plan. Omar spent a lot of money and did more damage than good. Spending a lot of money doesn't make you smart. And it doesn't make you a winner, either, unless you've got deeper pockets than Boss Steinbrenner (and, even at that, the Yankees had their sucky years). Pitching and defense make you a winner. A farm system stocked to the gills makes you a winner. I can understand the team's signing Wright for ridiculous money (while otherwise pleading poverty) given the team's history at third base and needing one legitimate "face of the franchise". On the other hand, I hated the Dickey deal with a passion; I don't think you ever get value trading a reigning Cy Young winner. Dickey was cheap enogh to keep and much better than the Mets (and a lot of fans) will ever realize; what he could've given us tutoring young pitchers would have been enormous. If you get 5 or 6 young pitchers for him, then, maybe, you do the deal. But not for this package. That said, its done. Time to move on.

                        I don't question anyone's right to boycott the Mets, nor do I question that someone doing so legirimately believes that "starving the beast" is the best or only avenue to change the team's direction. I disagree, but I'm not going to say that belief makes one a fair weather fan. But, if your view is that (like the Yankees) the Mets should be competitive pretty much every year then you should probably look for another team. Historically, fans of the Red Sox and Cubs have suffered far more than Met fans and, gripe as they might, they love their teams just as much when they lose as when they win (which, in the Cubs case, ain't often).

                        I love my Mets because they are my Mets--whoever they are. Win, lose or draw, that doesn't change. And I would just as soon watch a bunch of kids, most of whom will never amount to much, finishing last than a bunch of kids and Justin Upton or a bunch of kids and (free agent here) finishing next to last. And say what you will about Citi Field, Shea had to go. It had become a toilet. Litterally. I say that with love, but its true.

                        Last thought. Madoff aside, it's hard for me to get all riled up about Wilpon & Co. If you honestly think they're the worst the Mets have ever had, you must be too young to remember M. Donald Grant. By comparison, Fred's a piker at destroying a franchise. Right now, the Mets are undefeated and tied for first. Me? I'm going to enjoy that while I can. You all do whatever it is you feel you have to do.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by esplanade View Post
                          Long time lurker, lifetime Mets fan. Having been a Mets fan since 1962, I find this whole discussion amusing and a little sad. The Mets have ALWAYS been run this way, to greater or lesser degrees. In '62, they left their best players on the bench most of the time, making a business decision that they were going to lose anyway, so they might as well play the "familiar" (read: "old") faces of former Giants and Dodgers to boost attendance. Meanwhile, they just kept stocking the farm system. A lot of highly regarded talent came and went through the 60s--most of them falling far short of successful in the pros--Steve Chilcott, Billy Cotton, Les Rohr, John Glass--until, eventually, some of the kids stuck--McGraw, Harrelson, Swoboda, Ryan, Gentry. They got lucky with Seaver. Soon, there was a core major league team and a farm system full of "the next..." They weren't of course, but the overstocked farm permitted trades that gave the Mets the '69 championship. Some, you'd have liked and some you'd have hated, I'm sure. When Whitey Herzog ran the farm system and Gil was manager, that was the one stretch in their existence the Mets were run smart. But the championship team they'd built--even when they were run smart--only won once. '73 was something of an encore, but that was a fluke; they put together a nice run when it counted, but they weren't a very good team, really, and their complete demise was already well underway. From 74 through 81, roughly, they were a complete joke, each year seemingly more pathetic than the last. You honestly think THIS outfield is worse than the likes of Dwyer, Mangual, Mike Vail and Leon Brown? Really? (and, might I add, Leon Brown was one of my favorite all time Mets, but even so...)

                          From 81 or 2 on, they, again, stocked the farm system and waited until the core was in place. Then they traded off "future stars" for some key pieces, signed a free agent or two and the next thing you know, ol' Jed's a millionaire. But, again, they only won once. I remember when supposed Mets fans demanded Davey's head on a platter because "all he ever does is finish second". This time, their downfall turned out to be trying to build a team around Gregg Jefferies. And, so, back to the wilderness we went.

                          When they rose again in 2000, it was after another long period of stocking the farm and putting the pieces together until they fit well enough to get us back to the Series. And then came Omar. Say what you will, Omar was trying his level best to put a championship team on the field. He spent a lot of money and I have no doubt he had total latitude to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, Omar's level best wasn't all that great and he totally let the farm system go to hell.

                          Here's the thing. As a Mets fan, my love and support for this team has only waivered once and you'd likely be surprised to know that it was the '86 team I hated. I could relate to the '69 team, the '73 team, the 2000 team, and all the years that didn't go so well. That '86 team was a bunch of jerks. I didn't like them. I couldn't root for them. Putting that aside for the moment...

                          I do not concern myself with the ownership. I fully respect Sandy Alderson, I believe he DOES have a plan (that, largely, consists of building the farm system back up and husbanding resources in the interim) and I fully believe he has full autonomy to persue his plan. Omar spent a lot of money and did more damage than good. Spending a lot of money doesn't make you smart. And it doesn't make you a winner, either, unless you've got deeper pockets than Boss Steinbrenner (and, even at that, the Yankees had their sucky years). Pitching and defense make you a winner. A farm system stocked to the gills makes you a winner. I can understand the team's signing Wright for ridiculous money (while otherwise pleading poverty) given the team's history at third base and needing one legitimate "face of the franchise". On the other hand, I hated the Dickey deal with a passion; I don't think you ever get value trading a reigning Cy Young winner. Dickey was cheap enogh to keep and much better than the Mets (and a lot of fans) will ever realize; what he could've given us tutoring young pitchers would have been enormous. If you get 5 or 6 young pitchers for him, then, maybe, you do the deal. But not for this package. That said, its done. Time to move on.

                          I don't question anyone's right to boycott the Mets, nor do I question that someone doing so legirimately believes that "starving the beast" is the best or only avenue to change the team's direction. I disagree, but I'm not going to say that belief makes one a fair weather fan. But, if your view is that (like the Yankees) the Mets should be competitive pretty much every year then you should probably look for another team. Historically, fans of the Red Sox and Cubs have suffered far more than Met fans and, gripe as they might, they love their teams just as much when they lose as when they win (which, in the Cubs case, ain't often).

                          I love my Mets because they are my Mets--whoever they are. Win, lose or draw, that doesn't change. And I would just as soon watch a bunch of kids, most of whom will never amount to much, finishing last than a bunch of kids and Justin Upton or a bunch of kids and (free agent here) finishing next to last. And say what you will about Citi Field, Shea had to go. It had become a toilet. Litterally. I say that with love, but its true.

                          Last thought. Madoff aside, it's hard for me to get all riled up about Wilpon & Co. If you honestly think they're the worst the Mets have ever had, you must be too young to remember M. Donald Grant. By comparison, Fred's a piker at destroying a franchise. Right now, the Mets are undefeated and tied for first. Me? I'm going to enjoy that while I can. You all do whatever it is you feel you have to do.

                          The Payson era coincided with the years between institution of the amateur draft and free agency. During that brief window being in a big market didn't confer an economic advantage easily translated into better players. Powerhouse teams came from places like Baltimore, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and Oakland. Once free agency arrived big market teams could throw their weight around again. So there's just no excuse for the endless saga of failure that is the Wilpon era.

                          I loved the 1986 team. I like watching the Mets win. The notion that crummy teams, bad management and being a perpetual underdog is somehow part of the Mets' DNA is something I can't agree with. It reminds me of Dave Howard telling me being a Mets fan builds character. It's justifying a swindle.

                          M. Donald Grant was never really a baseball man and ultimately a dinosaur who the game had bypassed. He was swept away in due time. Fred, Saul and Jeff are parasites who keep getting fatter and fatter and refuse to leave the host. Many times a host will predecease its parasites. I'm afraid that's the kind of tenacity the Wilpons have. They've proven ten-fold more long lived and ten-fold more destructive than Grant.


                          "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by esplanade View Post
                            Long time lurker, lifetime Mets fan. Having been a Mets fan since 1962, I find this whole discussion amusing and a little sad. The Mets have ALWAYS been run this way, to greater or lesser degrees. In '62, they left their best players on the bench most of the time, making a business decision that they were going to lose anyway, so they might as well play the "familiar" (read: "old") faces of former Giants and Dodgers to boost attendance. Meanwhile, they just kept stocking the farm system. A lot of highly regarded talent came and went through the 60s--most of them falling far short of successful in the pros--Steve Chilcott, Billy Cotton, Les Rohr, John Glass--until, eventually, some of the kids stuck--McGraw, Harrelson, Swoboda, Ryan, Gentry. They got lucky with Seaver. Soon, there was a core major league team and a farm system full of "the next..." They weren't of course, but the overstocked farm permitted trades that gave the Mets the '69 championship. Some, you'd have liked and some you'd have hated, I'm sure. When Whitey Herzog ran the farm system and Gil was manager, that was the one stretch in their existence the Mets were run smart. But the championship team they'd built--even when they were run smart--only won once. '73 was something of an encore, but that was a fluke; they put together a nice run when it counted, but they weren't a very good team, really, and their complete demise was already well underway. From 74 through 81, roughly, they were a complete joke, each year seemingly more pathetic than the last. You honestly think THIS outfield is worse than the likes of Dwyer, Mangual, Mike Vail and Leon Brown? Really? (and, might I add, Leon Brown was one of my favorite all time Mets, but even so...)

                            From 81 or 2 on, they, again, stocked the farm system and waited until the core was in place. Then they traded off "future stars" for some key pieces, signed a free agent or two and the next thing you know, ol' Jed's a millionaire. But, again, they only won once. I remember when supposed Mets fans demanded Davey's head on a platter because "all he ever does is finish second". This time, their downfall turned out to be trying to build a team around Gregg Jefferies. And, so, back to the wilderness we went.

                            When they rose again in 2000, it was after another long period of stocking the farm and putting the pieces together until they fit well enough to get us back to the Series. And then came Omar. Say what you will, Omar was trying his level best to put a championship team on the field. He spent a lot of money and I have no doubt he had total latitude to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, Omar's level best wasn't all that great and he totally let the farm system go to hell.

                            Here's the thing. As a Mets fan, my love and support for this team has only waivered once and you'd likely be surprised to know that it was the '86 team I hated. I could relate to the '69 team, the '73 team, the 2000 team, and all the years that didn't go so well. That '86 team was a bunch of jerks. I didn't like them. I couldn't root for them. Putting that aside for the moment...

                            I do not concern myself with the ownership. I fully respect Sandy Alderson, I believe he DOES have a plan (that, largely, consists of building the farm system back up and husbanding resources in the interim) and I fully believe he has full autonomy to persue his plan. Omar spent a lot of money and did more damage than good. Spending a lot of money doesn't make you smart. And it doesn't make you a winner, either, unless you've got deeper pockets than Boss Steinbrenner (and, even at that, the Yankees had their sucky years). Pitching and defense make you a winner. A farm system stocked to the gills makes you a winner. I can understand the team's signing Wright for ridiculous money (while otherwise pleading poverty) given the team's history at third base and needing one legitimate "face of the franchise". On the other hand, I hated the Dickey deal with a passion; I don't think you ever get value trading a reigning Cy Young winner. Dickey was cheap enogh to keep and much better than the Mets (and a lot of fans) will ever realize; what he could've given us tutoring young pitchers would have been enormous. If you get 5 or 6 young pitchers for him, then, maybe, you do the deal. But not for this package. That said, its done. Time to move on.

                            I don't question anyone's right to boycott the Mets, nor do I question that someone doing so legirimately believes that "starving the beast" is the best or only avenue to change the team's direction. I disagree, but I'm not going to say that belief makes one a fair weather fan. But, if your view is that (like the Yankees) the Mets should be competitive pretty much every year then you should probably look for another team. Historically, fans of the Red Sox and Cubs have suffered far more than Met fans and, gripe as they might, they love their teams just as much when they lose as when they win (which, in the Cubs case, ain't often).

                            I love my Mets because they are my Mets--whoever they are. Win, lose or draw, that doesn't change. And I would just as soon watch a bunch of kids, most of whom will never amount to much, finishing last than a bunch of kids and Justin Upton or a bunch of kids and (free agent here) finishing next to last. And say what you will about Citi Field, Shea had to go. It had become a toilet. Litterally. I say that with love, but its true.

                            Last thought. Madoff aside, it's hard for me to get all riled up about Wilpon & Co. If you honestly think they're the worst the Mets have ever had, you must be too young to remember M. Donald Grant. By comparison, Fred's a piker at destroying a franchise. Right now, the Mets are undefeated and tied for first. Me? I'm going to enjoy that while I can. You all do whatever it is you feel you have to do.
                            Wow! Thanks for a fair and accurate review of Mets history. I can see by your 8 posts you must spend your free time actually doing enjoyable things. Like maybe watching baseball games. Enjoy the 2013 season. Win or lose, its the only one we will have.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by esplanade View Post
                              Long time lurker, lifetime Mets fan. Having been a Mets fan since 1962, I find this whole discussion amusing and a little sad. The Mets have ALWAYS been run this way, to greater or lesser degrees. In '62, they left their best players on the bench most of the time, making a business decision that they were going to lose anyway, so they might as well play the "familiar" (read: "old") faces of former Giants and Dodgers to boost attendance. Meanwhile, they just kept stocking the farm system. A lot of highly regarded talent came and went through the 60s--most of them falling far short of successful in the pros--Steve Chilcott, Billy Cotton, Les Rohr, John Glass--until, eventually, some of the kids stuck--McGraw, Harrelson, Swoboda, Ryan, Gentry. They got lucky with Seaver. Soon, there was a core major league team and a farm system full of "the next..." They weren't of course, but the overstocked farm permitted trades that gave the Mets the '69 championship. Some, you'd have liked and some you'd have hated, I'm sure. When Whitey Herzog ran the farm system and Gil was manager, that was the one stretch in their existence the Mets were run smart. But the championship team they'd built--even when they were run smart--only won once. '73 was something of an encore, but that was a fluke; they put together a nice run when it counted, but they weren't a very good team, really, and their complete demise was already well underway. From 74 through 81, roughly, they were a complete joke, each year seemingly more pathetic than the last. You honestly think THIS outfield is worse than the likes of Dwyer, Mangual, Mike Vail and Leon Brown? Really? (and, might I add, Leon Brown was one of my favorite all time Mets, but even so...)

                              From 81 or 2 on, they, again, stocked the farm system and waited until the core was in place. Then they traded off "future stars" for some key pieces, signed a free agent or two and the next thing you know, ol' Jed's a millionaire. But, again, they only won once. I remember when supposed Mets fans demanded Davey's head on a platter because "all he ever does is finish second". This time, their downfall turned out to be trying to build a team around Gregg Jefferies. And, so, back to the wilderness we went.

                              When they rose again in 2000, it was after another long period of stocking the farm and putting the pieces together until they fit well enough to get us back to the Series. And then came Omar. Say what you will, Omar was trying his level best to put a championship team on the field. He spent a lot of money and I have no doubt he had total latitude to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, Omar's level best wasn't all that great and he totally let the farm system go to hell.

                              Here's the thing. As a Mets fan, my love and support for this team has only waivered once and you'd likely be surprised to know that it was the '86 team I hated. I could relate to the '69 team, the '73 team, the 2000 team, and all the years that didn't go so well. That '86 team was a bunch of jerks. I didn't like them. I couldn't root for them. Putting that aside for the moment...

                              I do not concern myself with the ownership. I fully respect Sandy Alderson, I believe he DOES have a plan (that, largely, consists of building the farm system back up and husbanding resources in the interim) and I fully believe he has full autonomy to persue his plan. Omar spent a lot of money and did more damage than good. Spending a lot of money doesn't make you smart. And it doesn't make you a winner, either, unless you've got deeper pockets than Boss Steinbrenner (and, even at that, the Yankees had their sucky years). Pitching and defense make you a winner. A farm system stocked to the gills makes you a winner. I can understand the team's signing Wright for ridiculous money (while otherwise pleading poverty) given the team's history at third base and needing one legitimate "face of the franchise". On the other hand, I hated the Dickey deal with a passion; I don't think you ever get value trading a reigning Cy Young winner. Dickey was cheap enogh to keep and much better than the Mets (and a lot of fans) will ever realize; what he could've given us tutoring young pitchers would have been enormous. If you get 5 or 6 young pitchers for him, then, maybe, you do the deal. But not for this package. That said, its done. Time to move on.

                              I don't question anyone's right to boycott the Mets, nor do I question that someone doing so legirimately believes that "starving the beast" is the best or only avenue to change the team's direction. I disagree, but I'm not going to say that belief makes one a fair weather fan. But, if your view is that (like the Yankees) the Mets should be competitive pretty much every year then you should probably look for another team. Historically, fans of the Red Sox and Cubs have suffered far more than Met fans and, gripe as they might, they love their teams just as much when they lose as when they win (which, in the Cubs case, ain't often).

                              I love my Mets because they are my Mets--whoever they are. Win, lose or draw, that doesn't change. And I would just as soon watch a bunch of kids, most of whom will never amount to much, finishing last than a bunch of kids and Justin Upton or a bunch of kids and (free agent here) finishing next to last. And say what you will about Citi Field, Shea had to go. It had become a toilet. Litterally. I say that with love, but its true.

                              Last thought. Madoff aside, it's hard for me to get all riled up about Wilpon & Co. If you honestly think they're the worst the Mets have ever had, you must be too young to remember M. Donald Grant. By comparison, Fred's a piker at destroying a franchise. Right now, the Mets are undefeated and tied for first. Me? I'm going to enjoy that while I can. You all do whatever it is you feel you have to do.
                              Your entitled to your opinion and I respect it.

                              Believe it or not I also the love the Mets win lose or draw. What I can not and will not accept is lack of effort by the organization. Right now that is what we are and have been going through. There is no effort by ownership to put a winner on the field.

                              Like you I didnt concern myself with ownership....until 2009 when the stuff hit the fan, and his Madoff dealings had a huge and obvious impact on the team. Again...not acceptable to me. Then I realized what kind of creep Wilpon was. As I have said in another post - I can easily ignore Wilpon. I will ignore him when I feel there is an organizational effort to put a winner on the field. I will never give him credit for turning it around or suddenly see the light of the Wilpon Way. At best I will ignore that this creep is the owner.

                              Right now the OF is Baxter, Kirk, Duda. That may be the worst OF in the history of baseball. It makes me think Mazzilli, Henderson, and Youngblood were the heart of Murderers Row.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by esplanade View Post
                                Long time lurker, lifetime Mets fan. Having been a Mets fan since 1962, I find this whole discussion amusing and a little sad. The Mets have ALWAYS been run this way, to greater or lesser degrees. In '62, they left their best players on the bench most of the time, making a business decision that they were going to lose anyway, so they might as well play the "familiar" (read: "old") faces of former Giants and Dodgers to boost attendance. Meanwhile, they just kept stocking the farm system. A lot of highly regarded talent came and went through the 60s--most of them falling far short of successful in the pros--Steve Chilcott, Billy Cotton, Les Rohr, John Glass--until, eventually, some of the kids stuck--McGraw, Harrelson, Swoboda, Ryan, Gentry. They got lucky with Seaver. Soon, there was a core major league team and a farm system full of "the next..." They weren't of course, but the overstocked farm permitted trades that gave the Mets the '69 championship. Some, you'd have liked and some you'd have hated, I'm sure. When Whitey Herzog ran the farm system and Gil was manager, that was the one stretch in their existence the Mets were run smart. But the championship team they'd built--even when they were run smart--only won once. '73 was something of an encore, but that was a fluke; they put together a nice run when it counted, but they weren't a very good team, really, and their complete demise was already well underway. From 74 through 81, roughly, they were a complete joke, each year seemingly more pathetic than the last. You honestly think THIS outfield is worse than the likes of Dwyer, Mangual, Mike Vail and Leon Brown? Really? (and, might I add, Leon Brown was one of my favorite all time Mets, but even so...)

                                From 81 or 2 on, they, again, stocked the farm system and waited until the core was in place. Then they traded off "future stars" for some key pieces, signed a free agent or two and the next thing you know, ol' Jed's a millionaire. But, again, they only won once. I remember when supposed Mets fans demanded Davey's head on a platter because "all he ever does is finish second". This time, their downfall turned out to be trying to build a team around Gregg Jefferies. And, so, back to the wilderness we went.

                                When they rose again in 2000, it was after another long period of stocking the farm and putting the pieces together until they fit well enough to get us back to the Series. And then came Omar. Say what you will, Omar was trying his level best to put a championship team on the field. He spent a lot of money and I have no doubt he had total latitude to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, Omar's level best wasn't all that great and he totally let the farm system go to hell.

                                Here's the thing. As a Mets fan, my love and support for this team has only waivered once and you'd likely be surprised to know that it was the '86 team I hated. I could relate to the '69 team, the '73 team, the 2000 team, and all the years that didn't go so well. That '86 team was a bunch of jerks. I didn't like them. I couldn't root for them. Putting that aside for the moment...

                                I do not concern myself with the ownership. I fully respect Sandy Alderson, I believe he DOES have a plan (that, largely, consists of building the farm system back up and husbanding resources in the interim) and I fully believe he has full autonomy to persue his plan. Omar spent a lot of money and did more damage than good. Spending a lot of money doesn't make you smart. And it doesn't make you a winner, either, unless you've got deeper pockets than Boss Steinbrenner (and, even at that, the Yankees had their sucky years). Pitching and defense make you a winner. A farm system stocked to the gills makes you a winner. I can understand the team's signing Wright for ridiculous money (while otherwise pleading poverty) given the team's history at third base and needing one legitimate "face of the franchise". On the other hand, I hated the Dickey deal with a passion; I don't think you ever get value trading a reigning Cy Young winner. Dickey was cheap enogh to keep and much better than the Mets (and a lot of fans) will ever realize; what he could've given us tutoring young pitchers would have been enormous. If you get 5 or 6 young pitchers for him, then, maybe, you do the deal. But not for this package. That said, its done. Time to move on.

                                I don't question anyone's right to boycott the Mets, nor do I question that someone doing so legirimately believes that "starving the beast" is the best or only avenue to change the team's direction. I disagree, but I'm not going to say that belief makes one a fair weather fan. But, if your view is that (like the Yankees) the Mets should be competitive pretty much every year then you should probably look for another team. Historically, fans of the Red Sox and Cubs have suffered far more than Met fans and, gripe as they might, they love their teams just as much when they lose as when they win (which, in the Cubs case, ain't often).

                                I love my Mets because they are my Mets--whoever they are. Win, lose or draw, that doesn't change. And I would just as soon watch a bunch of kids, most of whom will never amount to much, finishing last than a bunch of kids and Justin Upton or a bunch of kids and (free agent here) finishing next to last. And say what you will about Citi Field, Shea had to go. It had become a toilet. Litterally. I say that with love, but its true.

                                Last thought. Madoff aside, it's hard for me to get all riled up about Wilpon & Co. If you honestly think they're the worst the Mets have ever had, you must be too young to remember M. Donald Grant. By comparison, Fred's a piker at destroying a franchise. Right now, the Mets are undefeated and tied for first. Me? I'm going to enjoy that while I can. You all do whatever it is you feel you have to do.
                                First off, great post and thanks for sharing that - very enjoyable. I too will always follow the Mets, win or lose. But we differ on quite a few interpretations of Mets history.

                                The one I'd like to take on here is the myth that all Omar Minaya ever did was throw money at free agents - and that his level best wasn't good enough. No, he didn't put a World Series team on the field, but he did come close and even his big money record is mixed, not hideous. Several key aspects of Omar's work get white-washed by the Alderson fans:

                                - Jeff Wilpon was every bit the meddler then as he is now, maybe even more so. I have this directly from several people who witnessed it. Omar and Sandy both toiled under that cloud, no question, but Alderson actually has it better because he was ordered in here by Bud Selig with a directive to clean up and pare down the Mets. So he has more autonomy than Minaya ever did.

                                - Minaya didn't just throw money at free agents. There were a couple of young, up and coming, farm-grown talents he moved quickly to retain. Their names were Wright and Reyes. Minaya wisely built around them.

                                - He moved quickly to sign Pedro and Beltran in his first year - both excellent signings.

                                - His early acquisitions included Billy Wagner, Carlos Delgado, LoDuca, and he did a great job (approximately 8,000 times better than Alderson) in bringing in key veteran spare parts on inexpensive deals or trades, guys like Endy, Valentin, Franco and Nady and bullpen arms. Oh and some dude named RA Dickey. No way in heck Omar Minaya fields an OF like the Mets currently have. The man had energy and drive.

                                - He didn't destroy the farm system. The Mets, under the Wilpons, have always stayed under the slot for draft picks, and they've let plenty of picks walk over money and years. And yet Omar Minaya drafted or signed Ike Davis, Jon Niese, Dillon Gee, Matt Harvey, Daniel Murphy, Ruben Tejada and others.

                                I would hardly call that letting "the farm system go to hell." I'd call it pretty successful working, given his Wilpon limitation.

                                Yeah Omar made some very bad calls - Jason Bay being the worst, Santana second worst (and don't get me started on Ollie Perez). Yes, he melted down under the glare in New York, and under the thumb of the Wilpons. But the notion that Sandy Alderson is somehow a much better baseball man than Omar Minaya is ludicrous.

                                Minaya did a lot more for the Mets than "spend a lot of money." His time here, while flawed, deserves to be remembered accurately and fairly.
                                Last edited by Strawman; 02-07-2013, 07:06 AM.
                                Cleon Jones catches a deep fly ball in F. Scott Fitzgerald's Valley of the Ashes, and a second-grader smiles in front of the black and white television.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X