Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

2016-17 Mets Off-Season Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Interesting to note as I have just read the Mets were not going to conduct contract extension talks with the starting pitching..Makes you wonder??

    Pauly brings up a good point when he says "It's the score after the third out is made" that counts. Everything else is conjecture..
    North of the Big Apple but missing Central Fla

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Shea Knight View Post
      I'm conflicted as to how I feel coming into this season given that this team's just had not one but TWO improbable runs to make the playoffs...2015 obviously infinitely better than 2016, but the latter year DID feel like an accomplishment just to get there with the unbelievable spate of injuries we had. I mean, no team feels "good" to "just make the playoffs" after losing the World Series/Super Bowl/Other Championship the year prior, but getting there with everyone going down and being a Familia meltdown away from continuing an extra-innings 0-0 nail-biter with one of the best postseason pitchers ever on the other side...not at all what we wanted, but in context, far better than we might've expected.

      So between that and the 2015 run (and the fact they play a lot of the good NL teams close--Cubs, Dodgers, Giants though we lost--over the past two seasons we've been "competitive" against those teams, at least) on the one hand I'm tempted to say this team now has a little "seasoning" (not a ton, but a light dusting ) and ready to "trust" them a little more when the going gets tough, as it inevitably will.

      On the OTHER HAND...They. Are. The. Mets. So they will stumble somewhere and something will go wrong with the Fab Four (I'll call it Five if and when Wheeler 1. Actually starts again and 2. Is actually fab, and before Pauly says it 3. That's ALL assuming Harvey, deGrom, and Matz return as Paul, George, and Ringo...otherwise we just have to "Imagine" Syndergaard as our solo ace again ) and Wright will feel a "twinge" in his back at some point and they'll hit offensive dry spells and on and on.

      The question is whether they can/we have faith they can either avoid "as big" of a spell as they've had over the past two seasons at times...or else if they have some experience and mental fortitude to help them get out of jams once they (almost inevitably) get into them.
      Simple put -- that is why the season is played.

      Right now there are good arguments on both sides (with nobody being right/wrong....yet) that they can win the division or flop out.

      If the pitching stays healthy and they get offense from 3-4 sources - they can be as good as anyone.

      If they get banged up again, and they have the same offensive woes - I can see a non miracle flop season.


      Someone can say (and they will) that you can say that about any team cant you? Well true, but this team is already starting offensively challenged, and they are coming off of a multitude of injuries. So they have some hurdles to jump over out of the gate where as some other top level teams do not.

      Basically how we feel and what we think of the team is a non issue because of two factor 1) they are good enough to win IF IF IF 2) They are bad enough to suck IF IF IF

      We start to fill in the IF's in 6 weeks.

      Comment


      • Jon Niese was just signed by the Yankees to a Minor League contract.

        If he's healthy he should do better there than he did here. He gets a lot of ground balls and they have a good fielding infield. His hard hit % and HR/FB are a bit below average overall. His BABIP allowed as a Met was high, but the Mets have never made defense a priority. He's been in decline the last couple years, though.

        I still wouldn't be shocked if he performs surprisingly well for them.


        "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

        Comment


        • WFAN- Niese competing for reliever role.

          Coleman- Walker extension to be announced soon. Hope that means his back is good.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by LI METS FAN View Post
            WFAN- Niese competing for reliever role.

            Coleman- Walker extension to be announced soon. Hope that means his back is good.
            Niese - good riddance

            Walker - They never even mention his back even to say he is 100%. You would think that with the extension talk he has a clean bill of health,,,,,,,,,,,,,you would think.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Paulypal View Post
              Niese - good riddance

              Walker - They never even mention his back even to say he is 100%. You would think that with the extension talk he has a clean bill of health,,,,,,,,,,,,,you would think.
              Niese was a good pitcher 3 or 4 years ago. He could become a successful lefty reliever maybe but he isn't someone Met fans should lose sleep over because he got away.

              I am surprised by the Mets wanting to commit long term to Walker. He is a good player but a lot of young pitching will be looking for big bucks in the next three years and they should be able to get production from 2nd base from a somewhat affordable player (Flores)?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
                Niese was a good pitcher 3 or 4 years ago. He could become a successful lefty reliever maybe but he isn't someone Met fans should lose sleep over because he got away.

                I am surprised by the Mets wanting to commit long term to Walker. He is a good player but a lot of young pitching will be looking for big bucks in the next three years and they should be able to get production from 2nd base from a somewhat affordable player (Flores)?
                Walker is only signed through this season. Extention talks went nowhere. How is that a long term commitment?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by jjpm74 View Post
                  Walker is only signed through this season. Extention talks went nowhere. How is that a long term commitment?
                  I think one report today had a LTD imminent (Ed Coleman) and one that said deal was dead (Mike Puma). I guess we will see. I do know they are considering a 3 year extension for about 40 mil. Not sure if the 3 years would be 2018-2020 or the 17 mil for this year would be ripped up and the contract would expire in 2019.
                  I like Walker, he is a natural 2b men but a bad back and being in his 30s would make me think twice WITHOUT seeing him play yet this year to prove the injury is a thing of the past.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by rjsallstars View Post
                    I think one report today had a LTD imminent (Ed Coleman) and one that said deal was dead (Mike Puma). I guess we will see. I do know they are considering a 3 year extension for about 40 mil. Not sure if the 3 years would be 2018-2020 or the 17 mil for this year would be ripped up and the contract would expire in 2019.
                    I like Walker, he is a natural 2b men but a bad back and being in his 30s would make me think twice WITHOUT seeing him play yet this year to prove the injury is a thing of the past.
                    It was a case of spending money to save money - a Wilpon paradox.

                    https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/...it-a-snag.html

                    10:21am: Mets GM Sandy Alderson has recently met with Neil Walker’s representatives to work out a contract extension, but talks have recently “hit a snag,” Newsday’s Marc Carig writes. The issue, it seems, is the second baseman’s already-in-place $17.2MM 2017, which he locked in when he accepted the Mets’ qualifying offer last November. It appears the Mets wanted Walker to restructure his 2017 salary as a condition of the extension, in order to free up funds for this year’s club.

                    Recent reports have suggested an extension for Walker could be in the three-year, $40MM range. If such a deal were to include 2017, that would essentially amount to an extra two years and $22.8MM for Walker.
                    That’s a significant commitment from the Mets’ perspective, but the price also seems reasonable given that Walker’s $17.2MM is already on the books. Walker had season-ending back surgery in September, but as Craig points out, the Mets’ willingness to extend him, and to give the qualifying offer in the first place, reflect confidence that Walker’s health won’t be a major hindrance going forward.

                    Walker hit a strong .282/.347/.476 in his first season with the Mets after arriving from Pittsburgh in a trade in the 2015-16 offseason. His defensive numbers also took a turn for the better in New York after years of average to below-average showings with the Pirates. If Walker were to continue to perform well in the coming year, he would enter the 2017-18 offseason as one of the most valuable free-agent infielders available. 2017 will be Walker’s age-31 season, however, and both his age and health record will surely be considerations as the Mets ponder extending him.

                    12:10pm: The Mets believe their extension talks with Walker are “probably dead,” Mike Puma of the New York Post tweets.


                    Lol.


                    "The Fightin' Met With Two Heads" - Mike Tyson/Ray Knight!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Mongoose View Post
                      It was a case of spending money to save money - a Wilpon paradox.

                      https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/...it-a-snag.html

                      10:21am: Mets GM Sandy Alderson has recently met with Neil Walker’s representatives to work out a contract extension, but talks have recently “hit a snag,” Newsday’s Marc Carig writes. The issue, it seems, is the second baseman’s already-in-place $17.2MM 2017, which he locked in when he accepted the Mets’ qualifying offer last November. It appears the Mets wanted Walker to restructure his 2017 salary as a condition of the extension, in order to free up funds for this year’s club.

                      Recent reports have suggested an extension for Walker could be in the three-year, $40MM range. If such a deal were to include 2017, that would essentially amount to an extra two years and $22.8MM for Walker.
                      That’s a significant commitment from the Mets’ perspective, but the price also seems reasonable given that Walker’s $17.2MM is already on the books. Walker had season-ending back surgery in September, but as Craig points out, the Mets’ willingness to extend him, and to give the qualifying offer in the first place, reflect confidence that Walker’s health won’t be a major hindrance going forward.

                      Walker hit a strong .282/.347/.476 in his first season with the Mets after arriving from Pittsburgh in a trade in the 2015-16 offseason. His defensive numbers also took a turn for the better in New York after years of average to below-average showings with the Pirates. If Walker were to continue to perform well in the coming year, he would enter the 2017-18 offseason as one of the most valuable free-agent infielders available. 2017 will be Walker’s age-31 season, however, and both his age and health record will surely be considerations as the Mets ponder extending him.

                      12:10pm: The Mets believe their extension talks with Walker are “probably dead,” Mike Puma of the New York Post tweets.


                      Lol.
                      That makes sense. I would still rather see him play 1st. I also think they could expect to have 2 league minimum salaried infielders starting next year. (Rosario and Smith). As usual, worrying about Freddy and Jeffy's wallet is entertaining but is something I wish I didn't need to care about when trying to figure out the teams plan to put the best players on the field.

                      Comment


                      • Gotta love the use of the term "Probably Dead".. Either you are negotiating or you're not..You're right about the minimum players next year..This is a interesting point about the Mets as they are apparently not wishing to negotiate extensions with their pitchers.
                        Guess Cap'n Jeff needs a new Mercedes.
                        North of the Big Apple but missing Central Fla

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Mongoose View Post
                          It was a case of spending money to save money - a Wilpon paradox.

                          https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/...it-a-snag.html

                          10:21am: Mets GM Sandy Alderson has recently met with Neil Walker’s representatives to work out a contract extension, but talks have recently “hit a snag,” Newsday’s Marc Carig writes. The issue, it seems, is the second baseman’s already-in-place $17.2MM 2017, which he locked in when he accepted the Mets’ qualifying offer last November. It appears the Mets wanted Walker to restructure his 2017 salary as a condition of the extension, in order to free up funds for this year’s club.

                          Recent reports have suggested an extension for Walker could be in the three-year, $40MM range. If such a deal were to include 2017, that would essentially amount to an extra two years and $22.8MM for Walker.
                          That’s a significant commitment from the Mets’ perspective, but the price also seems reasonable given that Walker’s $17.2MM is already on the books. Walker had season-ending back surgery in September, but as Craig points out, the Mets’ willingness to extend him, and to give the qualifying offer in the first place, reflect confidence that Walker’s health won’t be a major hindrance going forward.

                          Walker hit a strong .282/.347/.476 in his first season with the Mets after arriving from Pittsburgh in a trade in the 2015-16 offseason. His defensive numbers also took a turn for the better in New York after years of average to below-average showings with the Pirates. If Walker were to continue to perform well in the coming year, he would enter the 2017-18 offseason as one of the most valuable free-agent infielders available. 2017 will be Walker’s age-31 season, however, and both his age and health record will surely be considerations as the Mets ponder extending him.

                          12:10pm: The Mets believe their extension talks with Walker are “probably dead,” Mike Puma of the New York Post tweets.


                          Lol.
                          If I had to guess the Mets wanted to extend Walker with the caveat of tearing up the $17.2MM for 2017. They probably wanted to give him something like 12/13/15 for example. Saving $5M this year.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by brooklynboy View Post
                            Gotta love the use of the term "Probably Dead".. Either you are negotiating or you're not..You're right about the minimum players next year..This is a interesting point about the Mets as they are apparently not wishing to negotiate extensions with their pitchers.
                            Guess Cap'n Jeff needs a new Mercedes.
                            As much as think the Mets are a horribly run organization I wouldn't be working on extensions with any of the pitchers at this point. If they remain healthy through 2017 then start negotiating.

                            I still believe if Matt Harvey stays healthy, and is effective he will be traded during the off season. The Mets are not going to sign all of these pitchers.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by brooklynboy View Post
                              Gotta love the use of the term "Probably Dead".. Either you are negotiating or you're not..You're right about the minimum players next year..This is a interesting point about the Mets as they are apparently not wishing to negotiate extensions with their pitchers.
                              Guess Cap'n Jeff needs a new Mercedes.
                              Would you extend Syndergaard,Harvey, Matz, Wheeler or deGrom today ?

                              After 4 seasons Kershaw signed a 2yr $19mil extension. After 6 seasons he signed the huge contract.

                              Noah, Matz and Wheeler all have 2 seasons of work, with Wheeler more with injuries.
                              deGrom has 3 seasons which is still less than Kershaw.

                              Harvey has 4 seasons and 5 with injuries. He's the most likely extension candidate and they'd be crazy to extend him without evidence, no?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by LI METS FAN View Post
                                Would you extend Syndergaard,Harvey, Matz, Wheeler or deGrom today ?

                                After 4 seasons Kershaw signed a 2yr $19mil extension. After 6 seasons he signed the huge contract.

                                Noah, Matz and Wheeler all have 2 seasons of work, with Wheeler more with injuries.
                                deGrom has 3 seasons which is still less than Kershaw.

                                Harvey has 4 seasons and 5 with injuries. He's the most likely extension candidate and they'd be crazy to extend him without evidence, no?
                                I agree with you here 100%

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X