Although I've only read excerpts from his new book, Mike Schmidt seems to defend the steroid-tainted sluggers like Bonds, McGwire, Sosa, etc. In TV interviews he also supports them and their possible enshrinement in Cooperstown.
I don't get it. Schmidt was a stand-up guy and seemed to represent the best values of baseball... so why is he defending these guys when the evidence against them is so overwhelming???
I don't get it. Schmidt was a stand-up guy and seemed to represent the best values of baseball... so why is he defending these guys when the evidence against them is so overwhelming???
Comment