i have not ever claimed that the circumstances surrounding bonds are pure speculation and have no merit. what i have said repeatedly is that i do not know whether bonds used banned substances or not.
why do you continue to direct a condescending tone towards me? write to bonds directly at his web site and tell him how you feel. you continually include either name-calling or demeaning language solely because of my position regarding persons who have not been found to have used. why is this?
you said that i "refuse to use common sense in determining which way to lean", ignoring that i wrote that i have my suspicions. clearly, nothing short of me stating that bonds illegally used banned substances will please you.
'fess up now, 714 in 8399: do you actually believe that the reason bonds has not admitted to substance abuse is "because of people like [me] out there"?
thanx, though, for clearing up the #25 jersey thing. you went from "the fact he wears #25 (yes, there's something to that)" to "Theres nothing untrue about all of that, except for the #25 thing perhaps". your inclusion of "perhaps" belied the position that your comments were made tongue-in-cheek.
why do you continue to direct a condescending tone towards me? write to bonds directly at his web site and tell him how you feel. you continually include either name-calling or demeaning language solely because of my position regarding persons who have not been found to have used. why is this?
you said that i "refuse to use common sense in determining which way to lean", ignoring that i wrote that i have my suspicions. clearly, nothing short of me stating that bonds illegally used banned substances will please you.
'fess up now, 714 in 8399: do you actually believe that the reason bonds has not admitted to substance abuse is "because of people like [me] out there"?
thanx, though, for clearing up the #25 jersey thing. you went from "the fact he wears #25 (yes, there's something to that)" to "Theres nothing untrue about all of that, except for the #25 thing perhaps". your inclusion of "perhaps" belied the position that your comments were made tongue-in-cheek.
Comment