Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

is Matt Kemp the best Dodger including the Brooklyn Dodgers?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Blackout View Post
    .449/.513/.942

    kemp is having the best dodger month ever
    Do you know that?

    Comment


    • #17
      well compared to the ones i've found, yes.

      Comment


      • #18
        Two separate franchises....will Steven Strassberg be the greatest Montreal Expo/Washington National pitcher ever? When you desert a location, you forfeit the history of that city at least in my opinion.

        Although I'll tell you. Vin Scully is the greatest Brooklyn Dodgers broadcaster of all time and is also the great Los Angeles Dodger broadcaster of all time.

        The Brooklyn Dodgers, by their own volition, ceased to exist at the end of the 1957 season. All the Brooklyn records are frozen as of that time.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by MATHA531 View Post
          Two separate franchises....will Steven Strassberg be the greatest Montreal Expo/Washington National pitcher ever? When you desert a location, you forfeit the history of that city at least in my opinion.


          The Brooklyn Dodgers, by their own volition, ceased to exist at the end of the 1957 season. All the Brooklyn records are frozen as of that time.
          Obviously not true.

          Comment


          • #20
            another huge home run today!

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by BigRon View Post
              Obviously not true.
              Please explain to me whi it is obviously untrue. You have the Brooklyn Dodgers and then yo have the Los Angeles Dodgers.

              How is that different from the ew York Titans and the Tennessee Titans in the NFL?

              Oh BTW, who owns the legacy of Walter Johnson? Is it the Minnesota Twinkies, the Texas Rangers or the Washington Nationals?

              Gary Carter? Washington Nationals?

              There should be one rule about this and the one that makes the most sense is if yu leave a city,m you forfeit the history. It belongs to the city of origin. At least that's what I think is the way that makes the most sense. The Los Angeles team ot today, remember, is no longer owned by the O'Malley family so it has nothing to do with Brooklyn (other than, of course, Vin Scully). Like I say, not so obvious.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by MATHA531 View Post

                Oh BTW, who owns the legacy of Walter Johnson? Is it the Minnesota Twinkies, the Texas Rangers or the Washington Nationals?

                .
                The Cleveland Indians have a better case for Walter Johnson's legacy than any of these teams.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by EdTarbusz View Post
                  The Cleveland Indians have a better case for Walter Johnson's legacy than any of these teams.
                  Yeah I agree, Nothing against Minnesotta but I dont think they care too much for the old Washington Senators. I'm sure they have something to remember the old Senators though. I'm kinda curious on that now. I always kinda thought the Giants and Athletics never did alot for thier old citys teams but Minnesotta would have them beat i'm sure.

                  Again nothing against the Twins. It's a different city and name so of course most fans wouldnt even know who the old Washington players were . I can kinda see Baltimore giving Goerge Sisler and some other old St. Louis Brown players respect but I cant see Minnesotta doing too much for Walter Johnson. I'm probally wrong though. I would think Atlanta would be the best for the old cities they played in. I've never been to any of these stadiums so I wouldnt know though.
                  "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

                  "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by MATHA531 View Post
                    Please explain to me whi it is obviously untrue. You have the Brooklyn Dodgers and then yo have the Los Angeles Dodgers.

                    How is that different from the ew York Titans and the Tennessee Titans in the NFL?

                    Oh BTW, who owns the legacy of Walter Johnson? Is it the Minnesota Twinkies, the Texas Rangers or the Washington Nationals?

                    Gary Carter? Washington Nationals?

                    There should be one rule about this and the one that makes the most sense is if yu leave a city,m you forfeit the history. It belongs to the city of origin. At least that's what I think is the way that makes the most sense. The Los Angeles team ot today, remember, is no longer owned by the O'Malley family so it has nothing to do with Brooklyn (other than, of course, Vin Scully). Like I say, not so obvious.
                    I dont think any team should forfeit there old citys legacys. I think they should do more to remember em. I can see where most fans dont care about some team who played in 1934 but theres still alot that do. If I owned a baseball team I would put a museam in the ballpark where fans could go after a game and learn about the history of the team. I dont know if any teams really do this except by putting retired numbers on a flag or wall but the GreenBay Packers have one in thier stadium and I hate the Packers but i'll admit it was pretty cool visiting thier museam.
                    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

                    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      .....but sometimes it's the players too who have something to do with it. The late Johnny Unitas avoided any semblance of respect for Irsay and the Indianapolis Colts in the years before his death; he cast his lot with the Ravens. Jim Brown, I understand, can be a very angry person. Does he attend Ravens games as one of the faces of the franchise? Or is he at Cleveland Browns games? Is it the city? Is it the organization? Is it the corporate name? In many cases, franchise shifts occur when new owners take over. Does the entire history of the baseball in Philadelphia reside today with the Phillies? Who claims the legacy of Jimmy Fox? Cornelius McGilicuddy (Connie Mack)? Does the legacy of Hank Aaron reside with the Atlanta Braves (well at least Aaron played in Atlanta) or do the Milwaukee Brewers have some claim to his legacy? It goes on and on.

                      Look at the situation with the Mets. They took a lot of flack for, as an example, the Jackie Robinson rotunda a tribute to Ebbets Field (let me add here that manyh people forget about the pressure that was brought on the Mets while Citi Field was being constructed to name the whole park for Robinson). Citi Field, bts, has no resemblance whtsoever inside to Ebbets Field. Does a good part of the legacy of National Legue baseball in New York reside with the Mets? (The valid criticism of the Mets on this is the much greater emphasis placed on the Brooklyn Dodgers than the New York Giants)/

                      Whether you agree with my view point on this or not, at least let's agree that the issue is very murky and it would be preferable to be consistant one way or the other. To that end, I still believe the city is more important that the name of the organization but I respecdt anybody who disagrees. Just respect my views on this.;

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        homerun kemp

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I find it odd that a team like the Dodgers with such a long and rich history doesn't really have a "face of the franchise" type of player like a Willie Mays, Ty Cobb, Stan Musial, or even a Mike Schmidt. They've had great players of course but none quite at the level of "all-time" great. I suppose Mike Piazza could have been that player if he didn't leave the Dodgers half way through his career.
                          Last edited by Honus Wagner Rules; 05-02-2012, 04:11 PM.
                          Strikeouts are boring! Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.-Crash Davis

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Honus Wagner Rules View Post
                            I find it odd that a team like the Dodgers with such a long and rich history doesn't really have a "face of the franchise" type of player like a Willie Mays, Ty Cobb, Stan Musial, or even a Mike Schmidt. They's had great players of course but none quite at the level of "all-time" great. I suppose Mike Piazza could have been that player if he didn't leave the Dodgers half way through his career.
                            I agree, but I think it has a lot to do with them having a history laced with so many greats, especially in their final decade in Brooklyn. That Robinson-years-unity alone from '47 to '57 could be considered the "face(s) of the franchise."

                            However, even when considering only those who played for Los Angeles, I'd have to count guys like Koufax, Garvey, and Piazza before even considering Kemp just yet. Perhaps in a few more years.
                            "And their chances of getting back into this ballgame are growing dimmer by the batter."


                            Put it in the books.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Kemp has a few more years to establish himself. If he can keep his nose, and body clean, he could.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I guess the Dodgers will have to be content with having had the most important player to ever play the game and every April 15 every player in the game honors him and the team by wearing his number 42.
                                After 1957, it seemed like we would never laugh again. Of course, we did. Its just that we were never young again.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X