In this wonderful city I call home, we've had two examples of different philosophies of General managing. On one hand, you've got Bob Gainey with the Canadiens, who made a bad move by getting Radek Bonk in a trade, and now that Mr. Gainey is coaching, he would play Bonk 30 minutes a game if he could despite the fact he's been arguably the worst player of the team this season. And on the other hand, we had Omar Minaya with the Expos who wasn't afraid to quit on his mistakes. He got Cliff Folyd in a trade, it didn't work, he traded him away about three weeks later. He did the same kind of thing with Bruce Chen, tough on a smaller scale.
So the question I want to raise is this one: What is the best philosophy for a GM regarding his own trades? Sticking with a guy you delt for, even tough he's not producing, cause you saw something in him in the first place and you hope he can deliver, or do you prefer to have a GM who quickly turns around and gets rid of players he got in trades, thus admitting it was a bad decision on his part.
So the question I want to raise is this one: What is the best philosophy for a GM regarding his own trades? Sticking with a guy you delt for, even tough he's not producing, cause you saw something in him in the first place and you hope he can deliver, or do you prefer to have a GM who quickly turns around and gets rid of players he got in trades, thus admitting it was a bad decision on his part.
Comment