Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.


Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever |
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Local Group wants to bring the Expos back to Montreal

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Local Group wants to bring the Expos back to Montreal

    On July 23rd 2011 Roger Brullote (Analyst of the Expos RDS) mention that there is a group today which have deep pockets (rumours say huge Media corp. E.g. Bell or Videotron some say the Molson Family is behind this also) who are interested on bringing back the Expos back to Montreal, according to him this has been going on for about one year, but this group got into the banwaggon after the report that came out in June which mention that Montreal is a viable MLB city. (

    Now according to Roger,this group is analyzing the cost to bring back the Expos, which includes the cost of a MLB team and the cost eventually of a new Ballpark, so far i found the link but in french and the actual radio conversation in one on Montreal biggest sports radio ( but i also attached a local forum where people are talking about it after this report came out.

    I would like to know what everyone thinks of this news.

    Montreal needs a major north america sports to bring the city back in the map, reports say that Montreal lost 30% of american tourist after 2004, and guess what left Montreal on that year..... yes our beloved Expos.
    Last edited by superman1914; 07-26-2011, 08:29 AM.

  • #2
    Not sure how long it will be available, but here is a clip of an English interview with Rodger: (select "Rodger Brulotte joins Melnick in the Afternoon")

    My completely unsubstantiated guess on a prospective owner would be Quebecor Media, parent of the soon-to-launch TVA Sports. Interesting to hear the speculation on the Hippodrome site for a new ballpark as I had discussed this possibility last year on this web site. However, I won't be holding my breath unless an official announcement is made and more details on a business plan are released.


    • #3
      Here's some more about the subject (sent to me by SABR Montreal).
      « But what's puzzlin' you is the nature of my game... »


      • #4
        Question, where were they when the Expos pulled up the stakes? I don't believe that will anytime soon.


        • #5
          I would buy season tickets in a heartbeat!

          The question is, where would they build a new stadium?


          • #6
            There is alot of speculation at this point, some say the Hyppodrome in Montreal, other say the griffintown, the point is there is some places who could potentially built a stadium but all the is premature at this point.

            Lets hope one day we could ear again... Lets go Expos!!!!!!

            but in a downtown open park stadium


            • #7
              I dont know if you know, alot of thinks changed in Montreal since 2004, the dollars is a huge difference, we have 2 french tv Sports station, 2 english, we didnt even have one in 2004..

              Also there is a huge Media fight between coorperation such has Videotron and Bell media and Telus and Rogers, they all want a piece of the pie and dont want the next guy to have it.

              We didnt have this in 2004, if you look at videotron they will have in 2 months a new sport dedicated tv Channel,Bell they have RDS and TSN.
              If you only live in Montreal you see that alot as change in a small time.


              • #8
                They are ten years too late and probably non-existent to boot. They would have a brutal time finding a team to relocate.
                Buck O'Neil: The Monarch of Baseball


                • #9
                  Why relocate? The league could legitimately be looking to expand soon, considering that they're already talking realignment. The American League is short 2 teams after all.
                  Last edited by Imgran; 07-29-2011, 11:17 AM.


                  • #10
                    One real quick solution to a Stadium problem would be to restore the old Jarry Park back from tennis to its previous baseball configuration. Move the pool (if its even still there, I have no idea) and you could double deck some of the park or at least add higher tiers of seats. I bet you could have a capacity close to that of Fenway or Wrigley for a fraction of the cost. I have always felt that if the original club had just stayed in Jarry and made the ballpark the best it could be, the club would still be in Montreal. The original park cost only 3 million 1969 Canadian dollars.

                    EDIT: 100.00 dollars Canadian in 1968, when expenditure would have begun to renovate Jarry Park for MLB play is 648.39 in todays Canadian dollars. So what was done then would very roughly cost apx 18.5 million Canadian dollars today. At TRIPLE that price it would be well worth doing and a bargain. Luxury suites could be added by continuing the press box structure around. I have always thought that what the city of Montreal did with the original Jarry Park was one of the most cost efficient and cleverest solutions to a ballpark problem that was ever put into place. I would hope they wouldnt fall prey to needing a new super expensive concrete and steel behemoth ala the Big Owe only for baseball only.
                    Last edited by Calif_Eagle; 07-30-2011, 12:54 PM.


                    • #11
                      Here's another article on the situation:


                      Should be interesting. One things for sure, an AL team would make this a much better situation, what with the natural rivalry with Toronto. A new stadium is a must though.
                      Last edited by Anubis2051; 08-01-2011, 08:11 PM.


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Calif_Eagle View Post
                        One real quick solution to a Stadium problem would be to restore the old Jarry Park back from tennis to its previous baseball configuration.
                        As you can see from this overhead view, the baseball stadium was demolished, with the exception of a portion behind home plate, to build the tennis stadium, and so it would have to be torn down (along with the neighbouring building and tennis courts) to build a baseball stadium at the same spot. The renovations were done on the cheap back in 1969 because Jarry was not intended to be a long-term home for the Expos; as I understand it, additional grandstand sections were added, without provision for supporting an upper deck or luxury suites. A larger stadium would cost more (and these days, modern ballpark amenities help out with attracting fans to 81 home games). That being said, Jarry might be a good site for a new ballpark, separate from the tennis stadium (I don't think the city, Quebec Tennis Federation, or Tennis Canada would want to lose the tennis facilities), but the loss of green space would probably make it a non-starter, and there would be traffic issues to resolve. I think the Peel basin and Hippodrome sites are better candidates.


                        • #13
                          Yes to Peel Bassin or anywhere south of Notre Dame street, which will revitalize that area, and is still walking distance from the downtown core.
                          NO to HIPPODROME SIT. It would be a monumental mistake


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MC EXPOS View Post
                            Yes to Peel Bassin or anywhere south of Notre Dame street, which will revitalize that area, and is still walking distance from the downtown core.
                            It's about two kilometres away from the corner of Peel and René Lévesque, which is a bit far for most people looking for a casual walk to the downtown core. Of course, a shuttle would help.


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by tinseltown View Post
                              It's about two kilometres away from the corner of Peel and René Lévesque, which is a bit far for most people looking for a casual walk to the downtown core. Of course, a shuttle would help.
                              But only 3 blocks from where proposed Labatt was supposed to be


                              Ad Widget