Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Polo Grounds HELP

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Polo Grounds HELP

    Hey all you Polo Grounds experts. I got this interesting email today...

    I visited your website for the first time and enjoyed
    your information and photos re the Polo Grounds.

    Please note that one of your photos is very much in
    error. I refer to the one that shows a blue interior.
    At no time, includung the two Met years, (1962-63),
    was the interior blue. It was always green.

    Sadly, this photo appears on several websites.
    However, there is no verbal, written , or visual proof
    that the interior was blue at any time. The blue photo
    is the result of either time taking its tole on the
    original photo or negative, or a color distortion that
    ocurred during the development process. The fact is
    that "The Big Green Bathtub" remained green until the
    very end.

    I hope you will consider removing the blue photo from
    your website, for the sake of accuracy. Thank you for
    your condideration.
    Frank Cardone
    Any truth to this? I always thought that the interior was painted blue (or blueish) in the Mets/Jets years.

    Thanks in advance

  • #2
    To the best of my recollection the Polo Grounds was indeed painted blue during the two years the Mets played there.
    RCL

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by rcl986@aol.com
      To the best of my recollection the Polo Grounds was indeed painted blue during the two years the Mets played there.

      That is correct.

      When I saw my first Mets game in the PG, the first thing that struck me is that the green interior was replaced by Mets blue.

      It remained that color for the 2 years when the Mets played there (1962-3).

      Comment


      • #4
        Polo Grounds

        Originally posted by EbtsFldGuy
        That is correct.

        When I saw my first Mets game in the PG, the first thing that struck me is that the green interior was replaced by Mets blue.

        It remained that color for the 2 years when the Mets played there (1962-3).
        Look at photos of the polo grounds from 1962 and 1963 and the color looks like green to me. and there are color photos out there from the PG from 1962 and 1963.this is a question that has been talked about on my polo grounds yahoo group.
        LONG LIVE THE POLO GROUNDS 1891-1964
        http://groups.yahoo.com/group/POLOGROUNDS1962

        Comment


        • #5
          I'd suggest that anyone wishing to see the color of the Polo Grounds during the 1962 & 1963 seasons go to the following:-

          http://www.ballparksofbaseball.com/past/polo900.jpg

          I think the picture speaks for itself!
          RCL

          Comment


          • #6
            Polo Grounds

            Originally posted by rcl986@aol.com
            I'd suggest that anyone wishing to see the color of the Polo Grounds during the 1962 & 1963 seasons go to the following:-

            http://www.ballparksofbaseball.com/past/polo900.jpg

            I think the picture speaks for itself!
            I have player photos taken at the polo grounds in 1962 and 1963 and the PG looks very green to me in those photos. also checkout the simular thread here in the ballparks forum.
            LONG LIVE THE POLO GROUNDS 1891-1964
            http://groups.yahoo.com/group/POLOGROUNDS1962

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by POLO GROUNDS 1957
              I have player photos taken at the polo grounds in 1962 and 1963 and the PG looks very green to me in those photos. also checkout the simular thread here in the ballparks forum.
              I started going to the Polo Grounds in 1953. I attended the last New York Giants game played there in 1957. Somewhere I have 50' of 8mm film to commemorate that event. I also attended many Mets games played there in '62 & '63. When first entering a "renovated" Polo Grounds in 1962 I was taken aback by the new color and the addition of signs to the walls. I was completely struck by the contrast of what I remembered and what I now saw before me.The Mets (or the city) had spent between $250,000 and $350,000 to spruce up the old girl and that included a paint job in dark Royal Blue. Pictures, especially old pictures are just that, pictures. They tend to fade and discolor. Memories can also fade and discolor, but this one hasn't. I was there and can assure you that the Mets short two year tenure was spent at a Polo Grounds painted blue
              Last edited by rcl986@aol.com; 01-15-2007, 06:18 AM.
              RCL

              Comment


              • #8
                Polo Grounds

                Originally posted by rcl986@aol.com
                I started going to the Polo Grounds in 1953. I attended the last New York Giants game played there in 1957. Somewhere I have 50' of 8mm film to commemorate that event. I also attended many Mets games played there in '62 & '63. When first entering a "renovated" Polo Grounds in 1962 I was taken aback by the new color and the addition of signs to the walls. I was completely struck by the contrast of what I remembered and what I now saw before me.The Mets (or the city) had spent between $250,000 and $350,000 to spruce up the old girl and that included a paint job in dark Royal Blue. Pictures, especially old pictures are just that, pictures. They tend to fade and discolor. Memories can also fade and discolor, but this one hasn't. I was there and can assure you that the Mets short two year tenure was spent at a Polo Grounds painted blue
                OKAY THEN THIS MEANS THAT ALL OF THE COLOR PHOTOS AND people who have said that they were there and it was green are wrong. as i have said there are color photos out there that show the polo grounds green in 1962 and 1963.checkout this thread in the ballparks forum and there are color photos posted showing the polo grounds green in 1962 and 1963.
                LONG LIVE THE POLO GROUNDS 1891-1964
                http://groups.yahoo.com/group/POLOGROUNDS1962

                Comment


                • #9
                  I take it from your reply that you were never at the Polo Grounds. Well, I could be wrong so I've written to an acquaintence of mine, Vic Ziegel. Vic you may know is a columnist for the New York Daily News. He covered all three New York baseball teams as well as the Mets when they came into being. I've put the question to him and I will be happy to abide by his reply. I will certainly post it in any case and will admit I'm wrong should that be the outcome. Incidentaly, why the attitude? We're talking about something that has the relevance of yesterdays half eaten pizza! No need to SHOUT, I may be over 60 but I'm not deaf. Not even internet deaf. Relax.
                  Last edited by rcl986@aol.com; 01-15-2007, 01:13 PM.
                  RCL

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rcl986@aol.com
                    I'd suggest that anyone wishing to see the color of the Polo Grounds during the 1962 & 1963 seasons go to the following:-

                    http://www.ballparksofbaseball.com/past/polo900.jpg

                    I think the picture speaks for itself!
                    Then how would you explain this?



                    After studying more photos, including this one and Mets and Titans trading cards of the era, I've concluded that this photo is an acurate representation. I believe that the Polo Grounds was indeed repainted in the early 60s, but that the "ballpark green" wasn't replaced by blue, but rather this color, which is a more blueish green, but still more green than blue.

                    I thin we've determined that that photo you posted wasn't the true color.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      PG1957

                      UNDENIABLE !!

                      https://www.flickr.com/photos/655167...57667342516936

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The link doesn't work.
                        X
                        Archie Bunker: All I can tell you, Edith, is I'm surprised at you! Dragging me off to a moving picture like that! It was absolutely disgusting!
                        Edith Bunker: Well, I'm sorry, Archie, how was I to know? I thought it was a religious picture, "Cardinal Knowledge!"

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X