As we know, the Polo Grounds giveth and the Polo Grounds taketh away with regards to home runs over the years, but I've been more than dumbfounded with the general attitude amongst uneducated fans (at least uneducated with regards to the PG) that Thomson's historic homer in 1951 was an easy out in most other ballparks.
So I decided to take it upon myself to try to estimate where Thomson's shot would have landed in some of today's ballparks.
I started with this photo, to try to determine how close to the foul pole Thomson's homer actually was when in cleared the wall, which was 16 feet high at that point of the PG, I believe.
Pafko at the Wall.jpg
If the wall was 16 feet high, looking at the photo, it appears that Pafko is approximately 20 feet or so from the foul line, taking into account the odd angle that the outfield wall moves away from the foul pole at this point in the park. The ball flew above the 315 sign (give or take a bit) and just to the left of the support post for section 34. It landed in the lower deck due to the homer's very low trajectory.
So, the ball cleared a 16 foot fence, at a point approximately 16 or 17 feet from the foul pole.
I'm calling it a 330 foot, line drive homer. I think this is pretty close.
So then.......
Just for fun.....where would this still legendary Shot Heard Round The World have landed in one of today's ballparks? Google Earth is an extraordinary progrma that provides highly detailed satellite images of anyplace on earth (which is just fun) but also provides a measuring tool, allowing the user to very accurately measure from point A to point b anywhere on the planet.
Such as drawing a 330 foot line from home plate out towards a point 16 or so feet away from the foul line at modern ballparks.
Enjoy..... keep in mind that this might not be the most scientific analysis ever done of the SHRTW, but it's not too far off imo, if at all, and certainly good enough for a lively discussion on this board.
Yankee Stadium.... might have been a home run there....
SHRTW Yankee.jpg
A line drive rattling around down in the corner at New Busch Stadium.....
SHRTW Busch III.jpg
I'm having trouble with some of my images that I captured, but you get the idea. Anyone interested in this... should I keep going/trying?
Cheers,
Bryan
So I decided to take it upon myself to try to estimate where Thomson's shot would have landed in some of today's ballparks.
I started with this photo, to try to determine how close to the foul pole Thomson's homer actually was when in cleared the wall, which was 16 feet high at that point of the PG, I believe.
Pafko at the Wall.jpg
If the wall was 16 feet high, looking at the photo, it appears that Pafko is approximately 20 feet or so from the foul line, taking into account the odd angle that the outfield wall moves away from the foul pole at this point in the park. The ball flew above the 315 sign (give or take a bit) and just to the left of the support post for section 34. It landed in the lower deck due to the homer's very low trajectory.
So, the ball cleared a 16 foot fence, at a point approximately 16 or 17 feet from the foul pole.
I'm calling it a 330 foot, line drive homer. I think this is pretty close.
So then.......
Just for fun.....where would this still legendary Shot Heard Round The World have landed in one of today's ballparks? Google Earth is an extraordinary progrma that provides highly detailed satellite images of anyplace on earth (which is just fun) but also provides a measuring tool, allowing the user to very accurately measure from point A to point b anywhere on the planet.
Such as drawing a 330 foot line from home plate out towards a point 16 or so feet away from the foul line at modern ballparks.
Enjoy..... keep in mind that this might not be the most scientific analysis ever done of the SHRTW, but it's not too far off imo, if at all, and certainly good enough for a lively discussion on this board.
Yankee Stadium.... might have been a home run there....
SHRTW Yankee.jpg
A line drive rattling around down in the corner at New Busch Stadium.....
SHRTW Busch III.jpg
I'm having trouble with some of my images that I captured, but you get the idea. Anyone interested in this... should I keep going/trying?
Cheers,
Bryan
Comment