Announcement

Collapse

Updated Baseball Fever Policy

Baseball Fever Policy

I. Purpose of this announcement:

This announcement describes the policies pertaining to the operation of Baseball Fever.

Baseball Fever is a moderated baseball message board which encourages and facilitates research and information exchange among fans of our national pastime. The intent of the Baseball Fever Policy is to ensure that Baseball Fever remains an extremely high quality, extremely low "noise" environment.

Baseball Fever is administrated by three principal administrators:
webmaster - Baseball Fever Owner
The Commissioner - Baseball Fever Administrator
Macker - Baseball Fever Administrator

And a group of forum specific super moderators. The role of the moderator is to keep Baseball Fever smoothly and to screen posts for compliance with our policy. The moderators are ALL volunteer positions, so please be patient and understanding of any delays you might experience in correspondence.

II. Comments about our policy:

Any suggestions on this policy may be made directly to the webmaster.

III. Acknowledgments:

This document was based on a similar policy used by SABR.

IV. Requirements for participation on Baseball Fever:

Participation on Baseball Fever is available to all baseball fans with a valid email address, as verified by the forum's automated system, which then in turn creates a single validated account. Multiple accounts by a single user are prohibited.

By registering, you agree to adhere to the policies outlined in this document and to conduct yourself accordingly. Abuse of the forum, by repeated failure to abide by these policies, will result in your access being blocked to the forum entirely.

V. Baseball Fever Netiquette:

Participants at Baseball Fever are required to adhere to these principles, which are outlined in this section.
a. All posts to Baseball Fever should be written in clear, concise English, with proper grammar and accurate spelling. The use of abbreviations should be kept to a minimum; when abbreviation is necessary, they should be either well-known (such as etc.), or explained on their first use in your post.

b. Conciseness is a key attribute of a good post.

c. Quote only the portion of a post to which you are responding.

d. Standard capitalization and punctuation make a large difference in the readability of a post. TYPING IN ALL CAPITALS is considered to be "shouting"; it is a good practice to limit use of all capitals to words which you wish to emphasize.

e. It is our policy NOT to transmit any defamatory or illegal materials.

f. Personal attacks of any type against Baseball Fever readers will not be tolerated. In these instances the post will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the personal attack via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue personal attacks will be banned from the site.

g. It is important to remember that many contextual clues available in face-to-face discussion, such as tone of voice and facial expression, are lost in the electronic forum. As a poster, try to be alert for phrasing that might be misinterpreted by your audience to be offensive; as a reader, remember to give the benefit of the doubt and not to take umbrage too easily. There are many instances in which a particular choice of words or phrasing can come across as being a personal attack where none was intended.

h. The netiquette described above (a-g) often uses the term "posts", but applies equally to Private Messages.

VI. Baseball Fever User Signature Policy

A signature is a piece of text that some members may care to have inserted at the end of ALL of their posts, a little like the closing of a letter. You can set and / or change your signature by editing your profile in the UserCP. Since it is visible on ALL your posts, the following policy must be adhered to:

Signature Composition
Font size limit: No larger than size 2 (This policy is a size 2)
Style: Bold and italics are permissible
Character limit: No more than 500 total characters
Lines: No more than 4 lines
Colors: Most colors are permissible, but those which are hard to discern against the gray background (yellow, white, pale gray) should be avoided
Images/Graphics: Allowed, but nothing larger than 20k and Content rules must be followed

Signature Content
No advertising is permitted
Nothing political or religious
Nothing obscene, vulgar, defamatory or derogatory
Links to personal blogs/websites are permissible - with the webmaster's written consent
A Link to your Baseball Fever Blog does not require written consent and is recommended
Quotes must be attributed. Non-baseball quotes are permissible as long as they are not religious or political

Please adhere to these rules when you create your signature. Failure to do so will result in a request to comply by a moderator. If you do not comply within a reasonable amount of time, the signature will be removed and / or edited by an Administrator. Baseball Fever reserves the right to edit and / or remove any or all of your signature line at any time without contacting the account holder.

VII. Appropriate and inappropriate topics for Baseball Fever:

Most concisely, the test for whether a post is appropriate for Baseball Fever is: "Does this message discuss our national pastime in an interesting manner?" This post can be direct or indirect: posing a question, asking for assistance, providing raw data or citations, or discussing and constructively critiquing existing posts. In general, a broad interpretation of "baseball related" is used.

Baseball Fever is not a promotional environment. Advertising of products, web sites, etc., whether for profit or not-for-profit, is not permitted. At the webmaster's discretion, brief one-time announcements for products or services of legitimate baseball interest and usefulness may be allowed. If advertising is posted to the site it will be copied by a moderator and/or administrator, deleted from the site, then sent to the member who made the post via a Private Message (PM) along with a single warning. Members who choose to not listen and continue advertising will be banned from the site. If the advertising is spam-related, pornography-based, or a "visit-my-site" type post / private message, no warning at all will be provided, and the member will be banned immediately without a warning.

It is considered appropriate to post a URL to a page which specifically and directly answers a question posted on the list (for example, it would be permissible to post a link to a page containing home-road splits, even on a site which has advertising or other commercial content; however, it would not be appropriate to post the URL of the main page of the site). The site reserves the right to limit the frequency of such announcements by any individual or group.

In keeping with our test for a proper topic, posting to Baseball Fever should be treated as if you truly do care. This includes posting information that is, to the best of your knowledge, complete and accurate at the time you post. Any errors or ambiguities you catch later should be acknowledged and corrected in the thread, since Baseball Fever is sometimes considered to be a valuable reference for research information.

VIII. Role of the moderator:

When a post is submitted to Baseball Fever, it is forwarded by the server automatically and seen immediately. The moderator may:
a. Leave the thread exactly like it was submitted. This is the case 95% of the time.

b. Immediately delete the thread as inappropriate for Baseball Fever. Examples include advertising, personal attacks, or spam. This is the case 1% of the time.

c. Move the thread. If a member makes a post about the Marlins in the Yankees forum it will be moved to the appropriate forum. This is the case 3% of the time.

d. Edit the message due to an inappropriate item. This is the case 1% of the time. There have been new users who will make a wonderful post, then add to their signature line (where your name / handle appears) a tagline that is a pure advertisement. This tagline will be removed, a note will be left in the message so he/she is aware of the edit, and personal contact will be made to the poster telling them what has been edited and what actions need to be taken to prevent further edits.

The moderators perform no checks on posts to verify factual or logical accuracy. While he/she may point out gross errors in factual data in replies to the thread, the moderator does not act as an "accuracy" editor. Also moderation is not a vehicle for censorship of individuals and/or opinions, and the moderator's decisions should not be taken personally.

IX. Legal aspects of participation in Baseball Fever:

By submitting a post to Baseball Fever, you grant Baseball Fever permission to distribute your message to the forum. Other rights pertaining to the post remain with the ORIGINAL author, and you may not redistribute or retransmit any posts by any others, in whole or in part, without the express consent of the original author.

The messages appearing on Baseball Fever contain the opinions and views of their respective authors and are not necessarily those of Baseball Fever, or of the Baseball Almanac family of sites.

Sincerely,

Sean Holtz, Webmaster of Baseball Almanac & Baseball Fever
www.baseball-almanac.com | www.baseball-fever.com
"Baseball Almanac: Sharing Baseball. Sharing History."
See more
See less

Pete Gray: Single-Handedly Destroyed The Browns Franchise?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pete Gray: Single-Handedly Destroyed The Browns Franchise?

    I wrote and illustrated a little story about Pete Gray and the '45 Browns. My angle is that it is an interesting question to ponder whether the whole fortune of the Browns could have been different had Pete Gray not played for the Browns in 1945.

    The story is here: www.infinitecardset.blogspot.com
    See My Baseball Card Project: www.infinitecardset.blogspot.com

    See My Vintage Sports Posters: www.cieradkowskidesign.blogspot.com

  • #2
    I remember that movie as a kid, it came on during a weeknight and I think it was a 2 part movie. Cant say I remember too much more about it tho. I thought it was cool that a guy played with one arm but I never gave him much thought until I read that article. Very interesting piece.
    "(Shoeless Joe Jackson's fall from grace is one of the real tragedies of baseball. I always thought he was more sinned against than sinning." -- Connie Mack

    "I have the ultimate respect for Whitesox fans. They were as miserable as the Cubs and Redsox fans ever were but always had the good decency to keep it to themselves. And when they finally won the World Series, they celebrated without annoying every other fan in the country."--Jim Caple, ESPN (Jan. 12, 2011)

    Comment


    • #3
      Ellis Clary was quoted in this article. That quote came from my story. For those interested in more, here's my article on Gray and the '45 Browns (a missing chapter from my book on the '44 Browns):

      http://seamheads.com/2009/06/27/gray...or-the-browns/

      Comment


      • #4
        David - your book on the '44 Browns is a really great read. I haven't seen the seamheads article before - too bad it didn't make it in the book in its entirety. Are you planning on writing anything else on the Browns?
        See My Baseball Card Project: www.infinitecardset.blogspot.com

        See My Vintage Sports Posters: www.cieradkowskidesign.blogspot.com

        Comment


        • #5
          Its an open question as to whether or not Mike Kreevich (or anyone else) would have outplayed Pete Gray in the field, and at bat, if he had been playing rather than Gray. Thats not something we can ever know for certain, although surely we can all guess it most probably would have been the case. My question would be, has anyone ever reviewed the boxscores and/or any available play-by-play and newspaper articles from the games that Gray DID play in, as to how many of them Gray might reasonably be said to have "lost" by virtue of his play? Especially noteworthy would be any games Gray played in against pennant winner Detroit and runner-up Washington.

          If memory serves, Bill James once talked about Pete Gray in one of his books, quoted Babe Martin as saying Gray was the reason the Browns didnt repeat, and wound up showing in his article that Martin played worse than Gray did, and might have been the REAL reason the Browns didnt win again. Memory also suggests that James may have been being a little tongue-in-cheek toward Martin in that article.

          Its a shame the Browns didnt win again because the quality of play by the winning Tigers and losing Cubs in the 1945 World Series was so bad it got the nickname the "Worlds Worst Series" or something in that vein. The Browns may well have grabbed their only World Series title had they won the pennant that year.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Calif_Eagle View Post
            Its an open question as to whether or not Mike Kreevich (or anyone else) would have outplayed Pete Gray in the field, and at bat, if he had been playing rather than Gray. Thats not something we can ever know for certain, although surely we can all guess it most probably would have been the case. My question would be, has anyone ever reviewed the boxscores and/or any available play-by-play and newspaper articles from the games that Gray DID play in, as to how many of them Gray might reasonably be said to have "lost" by virtue of his play? Especially noteworthy would be any games Gray played in against pennant winner Detroit and runner-up Washington.
            According to Mark Christman, the main problem was Gray's inability to get ground ball base hits to center back quickly enough to hold the batter at first. Christman said this cost the Browns "8 or 10 games".

            Gray appeared in only 77 games in 1945, so it shouldn't be too hard for a fan with access to the St Louis papers for that year to work out a rough answer to how many games Gray may have cost the team. Anybody? Plus there's a biography, One-Armed Wonder, by Wm. Kashatus. This might have game by game breakdowns of his play, I don't know.

            The Browns did badly against Detroit that season, going 6-15. They were one game under with Cleveland (10-11) and they split with the Nats at 11-11. They were well above .500 with the other four teams.

            Possibly the worst thing that happened to the Browns that year was a six-game losing streak (their longest of the season) from September 6 through the 9th. After that they were 11-5 but it was too late.

            Finally, note that the 1945 Tigers were not that bad a team: they had Rudy York, Roy Cullenbine, Doc Cramer, Hal Newhouser, Dizzy Trout, plus of course Hank Greenberg was back for the second half of the season.
            Last edited by westsidegrounds; 06-23-2011, 12:37 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Good points westsidegrounds. Maybe someday I will have the time to look into the boxscores for Gray's games. One thing that can not be overlooked is the way his presence really disrupted the team spirit. Sewell tried really hard to get rid of the guys with losing attitudes and bring in all fresh players who were not stimatized by the "loser Browns" attitude. Heller's book is really good on covering all of this in the first few chapters. I think the extra press plus the distraction Gray's presence brought went a long way to undermine the team's spirit and make it look like to the fans that the Browns regular players were so lousy, look, they had to bring in a one-armed guy to bolster the team! The Browns and Sewell fought very hard to get respect through 1944 and this was a huge step back for the organization.
              See My Baseball Card Project: www.infinitecardset.blogspot.com

              See My Vintage Sports Posters: www.cieradkowskidesign.blogspot.com

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by jerseygary View Post
                Good points westsidegrounds. Maybe someday I will have the time to look into the boxscores for Gray's games. One thing that can not be overlooked is the way his presence really disrupted the team spirit. Sewell tried really hard to get rid of the guys with losing attitudes and bring in all fresh players who were not stimatized by the "loser Browns" attitude. Heller's book is really good on covering all of this in the first few chapters. I think the extra press plus the distraction Gray's presence brought went a long way to undermine the team's spirit and make it look like to the fans that the Browns regular players were so lousy, look, they had to bring in a one-armed guy to bolster the team! The Browns and Sewell fought very hard to get respect through 1944 and this was a huge step back for the organization.

                With all due respect for Gray's tenacity, I have to agree that having him out there was a serious blow to the Browns' image.

                After the 1944 Series the Browns were sold to Richard Muckerman, who was quite a wealthy man - he spent $500k to buy Sportsman's Park, another $750k to refurbish it, another $750k on San Antonio real estate to provide a place for the Browns farm team there, etc - so it was not the case that he needed to take desperate measures to sell tickets. I wonder if Gray played a lot of road games? Maybe at the home teams' request? Because the Browns despite being defending AL champs may not have been a great attraction on the road except for Gray's curiosity value?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dave_heller View Post
                  Ellis Clary was quoted in this article. That quote came from my story. For those interested in more, here's my article on Gray and the '45 Browns (a missing chapter from my book on the '44 Browns):

                  http://seamheads.com/2009/06/27/gray...or-the-browns/
                  Great stuff, thanks!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A little more on how Gray was employed, thanks to baseball-reference.com:

                    He actually started more home games than away games - 32H/22A.

                    He had 174 PA in the first half of the season and 79 in the second.

                    Most PAs were against the Yankees (63); fewest were against the Tigers & White Sox (21 each).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I am afraid you may be wrong on both counts (emphasis on the *may*). Have you ever heard of the phrase "house poor."? It's just as likely that a lavish-spending owner will be more dependent on ticket sales than a spendthrift owner. You just don't know. I'd suspect that fresh from buying the team AND doing all that spending ... well, no one in St. Louis is that wealthy generally-speaking and especially in the Depression era/war years.

                      You can never separate Pete Gray from the speculation of "publicity stunt". You can never separate the thought of "publicity stunt" when it comes to any team struggling under adverse financial and competitive conditions. That is the darned-thing about the whole affair. Everybody deserved better. The Browns, Pete Gray, the fans .... I am sure Muckerman was hoping that Gray would come in like gangbusters and put the doubters to rest.

                      Originally posted by westsidegrounds View Post
                      With all due respect for Gray's tenacity, I have to agree that having him out there was a serious blow to the Browns' image.

                      After the 1944 Series the Browns were sold to Richard Muckerman, who was quite a wealthy man - he spent $500k to buy Sportsman's Park, another $750k to refurbish it, another $750k on San Antonio real estate to provide a place for the Browns farm team there, etc - so it was not the case that he needed to take desperate measures to sell tickets. I wonder if Gray played a lot of road games? Maybe at the home teams' request? Because the Browns despite being defending AL champs may not have been a great attraction on the road except for Gray's curiosity value?
                      Last edited by Brownieand45sfan; 10-25-2011, 05:45 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Brownieand45sfan View Post
                        I am afraid you may be wrong on both counts (emphasis on the *may*). Have you ever heard of the phrase "house poor."? It's just as likely that a lavish-spending owner will be more dependent on ticket sales than a spendthrift owner. You just don't know. I'd suspect that fresh from buying the team AND doing all that spending ... well, no one in St. Louis is that wealthy genearlly speaking and especially in the Depression era/war years.

                        You can never separate Pete Gray from the speculation of "publicity stunt": That is the darned-thing about the whole affair. Everybody deserved better. The Browns, Pete Gray, the fans .... I am sure Muckerman was hoping that Gray would come in like gangbusters and put the doubters to rest.
                        I definitely agree with that!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I completely agree with you 100%,the 1945 Series was terrible,and the two teams in it were lucky that it was still wartime,and there weren't any better teams out there. I feel that Martin DID play worse than Gray,and he may very well be the real reason why they didn't win in 1945.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X