Couldn't the AL have saved itself a hassle in 1960 by just awarding a Minnesota expansion team to Calvin Griffith instead of allowing him to move the Senators to Minnesota? That would have made more sense and been more easily accomplished than uprooting the Senators, IMO. In essence, just find a new owner for the Senators in Washington as long as his name wasn't Bob Short.
I'm sure that this was proposed to Griffith, but what would have been the reasons for him to turn down an expansion team? Tradition? Griffith, I don't believe, was going to call his team the Minnesota Senators. Did Griffith know that he had a strong nucleus developing that would go to the WS in 1965? I doubt it. Did he fear that an expansion team, with the inevitable losing that accompanies such teams, would turn off the Minnesota market? Perhaps.
Nonetheless, I find it hard to believe that Washington would not have supported a team with Killebrew, Kaat, Oliva, Carew, etc. Nothing against the Nationals, but if Griffith would have accepted just an expansion team, the Senators could still be in existence today in their first year in their new ballpark.
I'm sure that this was proposed to Griffith, but what would have been the reasons for him to turn down an expansion team? Tradition? Griffith, I don't believe, was going to call his team the Minnesota Senators. Did Griffith know that he had a strong nucleus developing that would go to the WS in 1965? I doubt it. Did he fear that an expansion team, with the inevitable losing that accompanies such teams, would turn off the Minnesota market? Perhaps.
Nonetheless, I find it hard to believe that Washington would not have supported a team with Killebrew, Kaat, Oliva, Carew, etc. Nothing against the Nationals, but if Griffith would have accepted just an expansion team, the Senators could still be in existence today in their first year in their new ballpark.
Comment